TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- USA - West Coast / Las Vegas
-- Guy I need help....
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
ps
you people are too easy
Thats it, R!CH. You officially offended me. The next time I see you im going to confront you and ask for an apology
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zerotonin79 only idiots pay for music |
lol scene kids crack me up 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by bucke not so, but ok. wow, this is turning into another one of those threads isn't it? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zerotonin79 ps you people are too easy |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by bigsnail i pay for my tunes and i dont even dj anywhere besides my living room. dancerecords.com has mp3's for .89 i believe. |
| quote: |
Originally posted by zerotonin79 |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Direct Thats it, R!CH. You officially offended me. The next time I see you im going to confront you and ask for an apology |
hahahaha yeah I know.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Direct I proudly support file sharing. I didnt spend a penny on my 650+GB of music. Theres a lot of places to download mp3's for free. I use Soulseek v157. Theres a few torrent sites like club-trance, mysweetmp3 and a shitload of other sites im sure. I fucking hate it when dj's act like they pay for their mp3's. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by bucke you're dumb, so i'm not even gonna argue with you. |
Just a reminder...Tommyfromla threads rule!!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Direct hahahaha yeah I know. |
Am I the only one that knows about FLAC?
FLAC > Wave > 320
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nerologic Am I the only one that knows about FLAC? FLAC > Wave > 320 |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nerologic Am I the only one that knows about FLAC? FLAC > Wave > 320 |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nerologic Am I the only one that knows about FLAC? FLAC > Wave > 320 |
FLAC reduces file size by about 30% compared to wav but the whole point of FLAC is that it decodes into a bit-for-bit identical copy of the original wav. so FLAC isn't really better unless you can't afford storage. yes, I'll take it over wav if it's available, and definitely over mp3, but no it's not so much better to be worth spending any time searching for.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by able.h remember karma,.. one day u'll become the next tiesto or armin or whatever, and ur fans would be free-downloading music off the Internet... the question is: do YOU care? |
fuck yeah!!!!!!!! i just realized i got $5 back from beatport for buying tracks with paypal last month. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by bucke fuck yeah!!!!!!!! i just realized i got $5 back from beatport for buying tracks with paypal last month. |
Is it true that beatport.com charges you more for WAV over MP3?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by jonas I would care more that I have become Tiesto and find the sharpest object to jab into my skull |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by able.h Is it true that beatport.com charges you more for WAV over MP3? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by skizzell Aye. Likely reasons probably include larger bandwidth costs due to a greater file-size. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.