TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Attn ALL PRODUCERS
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by ibz on Dec-26-2007 15:26:

sounds like a cool idea.


Posted by Meat187 on Dec-26-2007 16:02:

I want this to be included:
http://whistlecore.ytmnd.com/

quote:
http://www.philosophaster.com/music...upidstupid1.mp3


Oh dear god.
Can somebody please do a mashup of Heater and Whistlecore? That would be the tune of the century.


Posted by Shade on Dec-26-2007 16:10:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
http://www.philosophaster.com/music...upidstupid1.mp3


Winner.


Posted by Darkarbiter on Dec-26-2007 23:30:

quote:
Originally posted by callme
ok im going to try and be positive, because i am very curious. Do you intend for this to be dance music?? At that speed people can't keep up...(now im no fan of dnb and to each their own but you cant fucking dance to it either) At that speed , its definately not a listening piece either. Please explain where you are going with this as i am genuinely curious.

http://www.djsonix.com/music/DJ_Sonix_-_It's_A_Jungle_Out_There-www_djsonix_com.mp3 sonix jungle mix
Listen for 20 minutes(or more)... come back and comment
I must admit I thought... "wtf is going on here... there is no way that is that fast!" but then I really got into it. Yes you can't dance to it... but you can certainly listen to it. Liquid funk is really easy listening to... I don't see your point?

Also watch some youtube vids...(some) DnB is designed to get you hooked (or does accidentally[by hooked I mean the speed you tap your feet]) at half its true BPM. You can dance at 85-90BPM can't you?

However 190BPM? Sounds a tad fast to me... the fastest DnB is only 180bpm really isn't it?

And most of the people who say "wtf is @ 180 bpm.. oh DnB that must suck then" well... I don't think they have actually heard much.

For the record I like everything from ambient to dnb

Would people please stfu about speedcore really... thats just trolling


Posted by stevo_0 on Dec-26-2007 23:31:

er dnb is roughly around the 180-181 bpm mark.. their is alot of music that runs that speed.

from wiki "The genre is characterised by fast tempo broken beat drums (generally between 160�180 beats per minute)".. close enough :P

most house music luvers cant stand trance because it is too fast, and most trance music luvers cant stand dnb cause its too fast. thats what i have found talking to people in REAL LIFE.. (Very different to online internet forums, where even only a small percentage actually post on the boards).

Id be interested in the cds, though would be questioning the quality of the songs etc. And i am aware alot of people wouldnt be able to handle 180 bpm range of music.


Posted by Ian on Dec-26-2007 23:33:

Loftgroover 220bpm ftw


Posted by d-miurge on Dec-26-2007 23:33:

I remember dancing all night long sober & without pills on awesome hardcore (I mean, well mastered and not that agressive). I was so stiff then!


Posted by callme:gsmile: on Dec-26-2007 23:43:

i just cant get into something that fast, it turns me off, i guess i'm just getting older. lol @ harcore

serious question, do you think the speed of the track makes something more enjoyable? Or just the speed you take to enjoy it.

most house lovers don't like trance because you can't really dance to non stop breakdowns. They don't want to stop dancing and put their hands in the air like zombies. They usually jusat want to keep dancing. (not the pogo hop either lol)


Posted by Gauss on Dec-26-2007 23:59:

Drum'n'bass usually has 173 BPM, but it can be anywhere between 160 and 180.

quote:
Originally posted by callme
(now im no fan of dnb and to each their own but you cant fucking dance to it either)

Oh really? Interesting...
And just a few days ago I was discussing with my friend how d'n'b is by far the best music for dancing.
Also, my other friend (female, even) asked me to burn some d'n'b for NYE because it makes people go crazy and dance like hell.

So please.

quote:
Originally posted by callme
most house lovers don't like trance because you can't really dance to non stop breakdowns. They don't want to stop dancing and put their hands in the air like zombies. They usually jusat want to keep dancing. (not the pogo hop either lol)

I also hate breakdowns... And I hated them even back in the times I listened to trance.
They simply ruin dancing. They're okay when you're listening to trance at home, but at the club they simply kill everything.


Posted by nchs09 on Dec-27-2007 01:54:

i went with a friend to a "heroes of techno" 5 year anniversary party at P60 in amsterlveen. first person to play was oscar mulero... nice techno... then dave clarke came on and he brought it haaaaaaard....

i was like "dude this is awsome but kinda hard...."


then some other dj comes in... bart skils or jouk deville and omg... that shit was SOOOOOOOOOOOO intense i was just standing in the back of the club sipping a drink... i could not dance to that shit hahah.


Posted by Darkarbiter on Dec-27-2007 23:50:

quote:
Originally posted by callme
most house lovers don't like trance because you can't really dance to non stop breakdowns. They don't want to stop dancing and put their hands in the air like zombies. They usually jusat want to keep dancing. (not the pogo hop either lol)

Agreed... cliche'h 2 minute breakdowns on 3 minute trance suck!


Posted by Chris Crossland on Dec-28-2007 01:26:

How do we know your not going to steal the songs and send em to labels to make a couple of nickles and dimes? Hmm?


Posted by lowski on Dec-28-2007 02:28:

hey sounds like a cool idea. all the best with it!!!


Posted by kitphillips on Dec-28-2007 03:00:

Hey the guy seems quite nice, even if his idea is a bit off the wall...No need to tear him to pieces IMO...
I also feel that your tempos are a bit limited.... I think maybe you should have ranges like 110-125 then 125-140 and 140-170. 180 is very high, but I know for a fact that some music can be at 180 and sound quite slow while other music at 120 can sound fast, its all a matter of how busy the track is. It probably isn't worth arguing about.
With your current ranges its awkward, because 120 is good for ambient, but 140 is quite fast for trance, I usually like 130-135 for most of my stuff. Also, if your just going to keep the compilation at the same bpm people will get BORED! Its important to change the speed throughout.
I think we should be more supportive of people who are actually trying to support up and coming producers. Theres another thread here where everyone's moaning about the state of the industry, but when someone has an idea to change things, you all slaughter him - I call hypocrisy. Of course, thats assuming you don't just want our tracks to make a few bucks right Bill?
Again, all just my opinion, but good luck


Posted by Simcut on Dec-28-2007 13:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Digitalbil
Epic failure?? Nahh... I bet I will find some bomb music out there that no one has heard and help get some new producers heard...

Stay Positive... 180 BPM?? Yes I produce all kinds of music and I did not want to not include any certain styles of music...

Digital Bill


Sigh, you said bomb music.

die.


Posted by kopi_luwak on Dec-28-2007 17:20:

quote:
Originally posted by callme
you are fucking crazy if you think anyone will listen to 180 bpm tracks. Just pitch up Samim Heater as fast as you can and get Alvin and the Chipmunks to do vocals.




Kopi =o.


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.