
TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- what would u say if i said
Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
Posted by Zild on Jan-03-2008 17:33:
IQ tends to regress to the norm. But I do know families where everyone is a scientist/doctor/engineer/lawyer.
Posted by Frenchie on Jan-03-2008 17:33:
| quote: |
Originally posted by denys envy
willy i know so many smart parents with dumbass kids. as i'm sure you do too.
so no idea where you're coming from with that statement. |
+1
SO true.
Sometimes you just pop out defects.
Posted by chimera66 on Jan-03-2008 17:34:
the world is pretty overpopulated and sometimes i wonder if the earth tries to purge itself a bit. dont' you notice there are alwasy huge natural disasters in way overpopulated areas. i say we restrict some countries on having kids because they have reached their quota
Posted by denys envy on Jan-03-2008 17:36:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Frenchie
+1
SO true.
Sometimes you just pop out defects. |
now if there was a way to genetically detect the IQ in the first trimester of a pregnancy that would be pretty effective.
of course the whole abortion issue would dominate the government/public circle.
...well whatever, i just hope my kids and grandkids live in comfort... after that fuck 'em - I won't know the little bastards.
Posted by Frenchie on Jan-03-2008 17:41:
Oh boy...the world awaits.
Posted by Vivid Boy on Jan-03-2008 17:50:
| quote: |
Originally posted by tubularbills
Hitler's goal was not to reduce overpopulation. it was to start "teh perfect race". bit of a difference.
i'm all for mandatory neutering of people after like 2 kids pop out, tho.
oh, and IQ tests should be mandatory before you can procreate. man, that would solve soooooooo many problems. |
maybe so but all im getting too is this with the hitler thing, its a very old saying which i stand by: belive nothing of what you hear and only half of what you see. (ps your school text books id say falls into that believe nothing of what you hear part)
remember history is recorded action, what the fuck does it know about motive, it is supposed to record fact and action,everything else is just speculative on the author or whoever recorded it.
we dont take the bible at face value i dont see why we should take anything else as well. The frame of mind we should come from is "I wasnt there so anything is possible"
Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-03-2008 17:52:
Re: what would u say if i said
| quote: |
Originally posted by Vivid Boy
this world is way overpopulated and half of the worlds population just needs too vamos on the fuck outta here in order to have a stable world?
was hitler taking the right steps? |
I would say I totally agree....if you start off with all the starving aids kids in africa I think that should solve a good portion of the population problem.
Posted by denys envy on Jan-03-2008 17:53:
eric the anarchist 
Posted by Spike on Jan-03-2008 17:53:
| quote: |
Originally posted by tubularbills
Hitler's goal was not to reduce overpopulation. it was to start "teh perfect race". bit of a difference.
i'm all for mandatory neutering of people after like 2 kids pop out, tho.
oh, and IQ tests should be mandatory before you can procreate. man, that would solve soooooooo many problems. |
fuck yeah. there are some people that just should NEEEEEEEEVER have children let alone raise them
Posted by tubularbills on Jan-03-2008 18:09:
| quote: |
Originally posted by denys envy
eric the anarchist |
so i just read his bible comment, and then i read this. and at first, i thought you said, "antichrist" 
perhaps IQ was the wrong thing to say...maybe...just educated? i don't mean like PhD educated....just...knowing allllllllllllllllll the aspects of having a kid...proper diet, exercise (lol, exercise and proper diet, lol), knowing how to discipline them, interacting with them, etc...so you'd have to have some kind of parenting class to pass.
and i'm sure there are plenty of single mothers/fathers that could do it on their own too. i'm not saying that it has to be the typical mother/father/2.4 kid household.
i just wish people made good decisions about extending thier family.
Posted by chimera66 on Jan-03-2008 18:24:
Re: Re: what would u say if i said
| quote: |
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
I would say I totally agree....if you start off with all the starving aids kids in africa I think that should solve a good portion of the population problem. |
how about all the people with aids in china and russia? they have some of the fastest rates of contracting aids from what i've heard plus africa is underpopulated in relation to its size.
Posted by Dr. DAS on Jan-03-2008 18:29:
Non-issue, we're all going to die in 2012, anyways.
Posted by nchs09 on Jan-03-2008 18:43:
| quote: |
Originally posted by eROs.au
I would ask you what makes you think the world is overpopulated |
The current inability to maintain a sustainable future?
Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-03-2008 19:03:
Re: Re: Re: what would u say if i said
| quote: |
Originally posted by chimera66
how about all the people with aids in china and russia? they have some of the fastest rates of contracting aids from what i've heard plus africa is underpopulated in relation to its size. |
How about this....anyone who is a drain on society, anyone over the age of 65, anyone with a life threatening disease, anyone without a job, and anyone who's last name has more the 18 letters of the alphabet in it should be killed.
Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-03-2008 19:08:
The human population is not too high for the earth to support; therfore, population isn't the problem. Unfortunatley, the distribution of the human population is inconsistant with the distribution of resources necessary to reasonably sustain the human population, thus, I submit the problem is not the raw numbers of people but the poor distribution of people relative to resources.
Posted by wizniz on Jan-03-2008 19:09:

Posted by Dr. DAS on Jan-03-2008 19:11:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
The human population is not too high for the earth to support; therfore, population isn't the problem. Unfortunatley, the distribution of the human population is inconsistant with the distribution of resources necessary to reasonably sustain the human population, thus, I submit the problem is not the raw numbers of people but the poor distribution of people relative to resources. |
Then it's settled, all new immigrants to Canada will be required to spend three years in a specially-built compound in Nunavut.
Posted by chimera66 on Jan-03-2008 19:14:
Re: Re: Re: Re: what would u say if i said
| quote: |
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
How about this....anyone who is a drain on society, anyone over the age of 65, anyone with a life threatening disease, anyone without a job, and anyone who's last name has more the 18 letters of the alphabet in it should be killed. |
i might be ok with that
Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-03-2008 19:16:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
The human population is not too high for the earth to support; therfore, population isn't the problem. Unfortunatley, the distribution of the human population is inconsistant with the distribution of resources necessary to reasonably sustain the human population, thus, I submit the problem is not the raw numbers of people but the poor distribution of people relative to resources. |
What was you solution to the Natives in Canada.
Posted by Vivid Boy on Jan-03-2008 19:44:
| quote: |
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
What was you solution to the Natives in Canada. |
kill hte majority and give the rest drugs booze and gambling to occupy their minds from holding a comeback revolution
Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-03-2008 20:02:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Vivid Boy
kill hte majority and give the rest drugs booze and gambling to occupy their minds from holding a comeback revolution |
I think his solution was something liek building a wall around all the reserves and then filling them with water.
Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-03-2008 20:04:
| quote: |
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
What was you solution to the Natives in Canada. |
Give them total self government over their lands (with the exception of federal or provincial infrastructure) and a one time funding allotment to go with it. Since Native bands are horrible at managing money and even worse at maintaining gainful employment it is un fait du complie that most of the bands will go bankrupt within a generation or two. Once they have gone bankrupt they will have little choice but to sell their land (the only viable source of capital they have)... then the government can buy it back from them, kick them the fuck off and no one can cry foul or accuse them of stealing it from the dirty red skined lazy fuckin' yahoos. TAKE THAT JOHNNY TWO FEATHERS!
Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-03-2008 20:08:
| quote: |
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
I think his solution was something liek building a wall around all the reserves and then filling them with water. |
No, that was my solution to the Quebec issue... but it seems that has sorted itself out. Strange how once all the businesses got scared of the seperatists and ran screaming from the province bringing all their money with them that whole soverignty association shit quieted right down. Looks like Les Quebecois are finally realizing they're too fuckin' backward to make it on their own afterall. Yet another group of bums suckling the tit of those of us that actually contribute to the country.
Posted by steven-neil on Jan-03-2008 20:08:
| quote: |
Originally posted by eRRaTiK
who's sheila-neil?
>> ERROR: failure to compute |
She's my wife ATM...
Posted by UWM on Jan-03-2008 20:09:

Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.