TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Could This Article Be Right About The Death Of Trance?
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by Darkarbiter on Jan-04-2008 12:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Whirloop
Perhaps even Goatrance...

I would defenitly hope so... defenitly prefer goa trance over psy.

Hopefully suntrip records will pave the way.


Posted by piku303 on Jan-04-2008 17:07:

i think that if anything is going to sustain trance, its going to be goa/psy. that genre/genres have always been, to me, the least concerned with commercial sucess. theres a HUGE dedicated following and lots of underground stuff as well. also one thing i really like about goa/psy is that for the most part the kicks and bass timbres are exactly the same. the standard tight kick and the sh-101 bassline take away the effort of having to make the "perfect" kick and bass sound. then the producer can focus on the actual song and not get obsessed with the production aspect and whether or not his kick and bass are sounding like such and such DJ's latest production. thats not to say that theres not a certain art to using the typical psy kick and bass, just that it provides a very solid groundwork for making good music over top those two elements. aside from the kick and bass goa/psy is typically least concerned of all trance genres about achieving a specific sound and allows for a lot of experimentation by the artist. im not the end all authority when it come to EDM so if your going to get a boner by flaming me for stuff i said and get a rush out of [trying] belittling somebody, then f off. otherwise lets keep this discussion going.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Jan-04-2008 17:18:

Seems to be on the money to me.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-04-2008 17:23:

Some good new trance:

http://www.discogs.com/release/1153066


Posted by Clovis on Jan-04-2008 17:35:

quote:
Originally posted by paulandrews
I actually know a guy who calls 'Lauschgoldengel' prog-trance just to make sure he hasn't left the trance bubble while listening to this.



I know that guy to, his name is Az


Posted by Clovis on Jan-04-2008 17:39:

Also, I laugh at people who keep saying trance is gonna die every year.


It isn't. Plain and simple. Theres enough kids and enough new markets for it to keep going for another 5-10 years even with the lowest possible quality standards imaginable. Yeah it will get worse and worse, tired ideas will continue to be recycled, but so long as Armin, PVD, Tiesto etc keep marketing themselves as SUPER MEGA DJs and play in 5-10-15 thousand capacity stadium events to thousands of clueless kids, trance will always have an audience, always sell enough CDs and always get the most votes in DJ Mag.

The rest of us who like good music can go see excellent DJs at small intimate venues and have the time of our lives...I don't see trance getting in the way...


Posted by Sergee on Jan-04-2008 18:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Lightspeed
IMO only Uplifting Trance is "dead". I always wonder why people say the whole genre is when theres TONS of tracks that are plenty good being released all the time.


quoted for truth


Posted by sljiva on Jan-04-2008 18:17:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Some good new trance:

http://www.discogs.com/release/1153066


Here's some more:
System 7 - Phoenix

Just look at the co-producers: Jam El Mar, Slackbaba, Son Kite, Eat Static. Although I must admit I was a little disappointed with Jam El Mar's tracks..


Posted by julien2 on Jan-04-2008 18:19:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
this is part of the problem - everyone's always looking for a big, obvious name, a load of hype

what is "new, fresh"? new and fresh is listening to different kinds of music...



my advice would be to deliberately listen to tracks/producers/labels you've never heard before


precisely, looking for a savior will not help you guys


Posted by julien2 on Jan-04-2008 18:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Tom Scott
Guess what, I don't give a fuck. If you don't like it don't listen to it but fgs don't waste your time writing stuff like this because people (such as me) who happen to like Trance aren't going to give a shit. Just because you jump on the 'trance slating' bandwagon like most other people doesn't mean that I respect you enough to change my musical tatses. To people who like Trance still (believe it or not Mr Romero, but they do exist), this article - like the rest of them - won't make any difference to anything; whilst the people who have moved on from Trance for the reasons Mr Romero stated in his article (anticipating some slating at this I want you to know that I have nothing against these people); will simply nod thier heads and agree. Great achievement Dennis Romero.

It is not the fans, the DJs, the venues, the culture or the music itself which is killing Trance music, it is people who overanalyse everything in a record instead of simply listening to it. Its people who write articles like this slagging off everything under the sun which is related to the Genre. Im not denying that Trance can be 'cheesy' and 'commercial', neither am I denying the problem (that most definately exists) of formulaic and sometimes tacky music coming out of the Trance genre (however this does happen in the whole Spectrum of music) - what I am doing is pointing out what I think is doing the most damage to trance. Not people like Tiesto or Armin Van Buuren, but people like Dennis Romero.


Stereotypical trance cracker response. Bravo


Posted by Jono404 on Jan-04-2008 18:24:

The arcticle claims trance is trendy... what is this 1998? All the big ibiza clubs are doing electro/minimal/tech whatever now. Also I haven't seen a commercial trance track in the charts (uk charts this is) since about 2003, it's all big room electro house and house, same thing all over the ministry annuals and clubbers guide cds etc. I don't really see how people can be labelling trance as super commercial when you look at any digital download site chart and it will be devoid of trance.


Posted by julien2 on Jan-04-2008 18:26:

You're talking about Europe. The article talks about USA. USA is shit for EDM. So a lot of trance gets playedq


Posted by XaNaX on Jan-04-2008 18:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Tom Scott
what I am doing is pointing out what I think is doing the most damage to trance. Not people like Tiesto or Armin Van Buuren, but people like Dennis Romero.


well Tiesto and Armin are certainly not doing anything to help it. because of them most people think trance is the watered down commercial electronic pop music they play


Posted by julien2 on Jan-04-2008 18:31:

White Lies - PVD anyone ?


laule


Posted by [mart] on Jan-04-2008 18:39:

Hasn't trance died already? Several years ago, in fact.


Posted by Branah on Jan-04-2008 18:46:

quote:
Originally posted by Jono404
The arcticle claims trance is trendy... what is this 1998? All the big ibiza clubs are doing electro/minimal/tech whatever now. Also I haven't seen a commercial trance track in the charts (uk charts this is) since about 2003, it's all big room electro house and house, same thing all over the ministry annuals and clubbers guide cds etc. I don't really see how people can be labelling trance as super commercial when you look at any digital download site chart and it will be devoid of trance.


spot on.


Posted by thoughtlessjex on Jan-05-2008 05:27:

Trance is dead. Long live Trance.

I wish people would stop saying trance is dead. The fact is that it really still is commercially viable and anyone who thinks otherwise is seriously deluded. Dead doesn't mean the genre is devoid of creativity, it just means the genre has a distinct dearth of artists contributing to the creative well, and a dearth of committed consumers. Trance has both, even if the most commercially viable stuff really is devoid of creative drive.

Directionless and cheesy? Yes. Dead? No.

But whatever, people have been tooting this horn for a while, and just because it sounds dumb doesn't mean people won't keep tooting it in the future.


Posted by Zharen on Jan-05-2008 06:11:

As much as I'll agree with the author on certain parts of the article, the fact that Kanye West is even mentioned in this article stifles my ability to take him/her seriously.

Either way, I still enjoy trance and find myself finding a good new release here and there, but progressive and deep house have become the new staple of my music diet.


Posted by Beatflux on Jan-05-2008 07:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Ishkur
This is the greatest advice in the whole god damn universe. Always keep a tab of what's hot on the charts, and then don't get that music.


This sort of "don't get what's popular" attitude is just as shallow as the "I only listen to the popular stuff" attitude.


Posted by idoru on Jan-05-2008 09:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
Also, I laugh at people who keep saying trance is gonna die every year.


It isn't. Plain and simple. Theres enough kids and enough new markets for it to keep going for another 5-10 years even with the lowest possible quality standards imaginable. Yeah it will get worse and worse, tired ideas will continue to be recycled, but so long as Armin, PVD, Tiesto etc keep marketing themselves as SUPER MEGA DJs and play in 5-10-15 thousand capacity stadium events to thousands of clueless kids, trance will always have an audience, always sell enough CDs and always get the most votes in DJ Mag.

The rest of us who like good music can go see excellent DJs at small intimate venues and have the time of our lives...I don't see trance getting in the way...


This thread should really have ended here.


Posted by nefardec on Jan-05-2008 10:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Beatflux
This sort of "don't get what's popular" attitude is just as shallow as the "I only listen to the popular stuff" attitude.



that's not at all what I said.

I still keep up with what everyone else is playing, but I make a point of exposing myself to completely new things as much as I can.


In any case, playing tracks that everyone knows is going to make you a pretty boring dj. I suppose since I try not to be a boring DJ, I have this tendency to always dig deeper for my music. If I was just a nostalgic club kid I'd probably be different.


Posted by RebeL9 on Jan-05-2008 11:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Tom Scott
because im fed up of all these 'trance is dead' articles so i wrote out my own post. the difference between mine and the other guys is that mine is original and not just jumping on, like i said, the trance slating bandwagon


original? Laughable.


Posted by cmay119 on Jan-05-2008 16:06:

quote:
Originally posted by idoru
This thread should really have ended here.


Was just about to say the same thing. Quoting the "I don't see Trance getting in the way" is the best response I've ever read in these back and forth 'Trance is dead' debates.


Posted by Tea-mo on Jan-05-2008 17:25:

Could This Article Be Right About The Death Of Trance?

Without even reading the article - No.


Posted by clubamerica on Jan-06-2008 08:34:

Trance is dead


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.