TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- David Lynch on the iphone
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by Minhaj on Jan-09-2008 23:52:

quote:
Originally posted by punjabi
My iPhone is fucking awesome. He loses.

he made mulholland dive and inland empire
and your a sand nigg3r who probably never accomplished anything
you lose.


Posted by Minhaj on Jan-09-2008 23:54:

quote:
Originally posted by forever amber
Who is David Lynch?



Posted by kamil on Jan-10-2008 00:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Meat187
Apart from artistic integrity and your obvious dislike towards David Lynch, you can't seriously be claiming that watching a movie (insert your favorite movie here) on an iphone comes close to watching it on the big screen, or on a good system at home. That's like listening to music (insert your favorite track here) on some crappy laptop speakers instead of a decent sound system. So much is lost.
And a track lasts less than 10 mins, a film over 2 hours. Like Lynch says, you're cheated.


some people should be ignored. nobody should watch anything other than hollywood crap on a 2 inch screen.


Posted by me&myself on Jan-10-2008 01:12:

quote:
Originally posted by forever amber
Who is David Lynch?

genius


(don't ask silly question, u have internet -> google ->


Posted by Meat187 on Jan-10-2008 07:16:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
You could't have missed my point more completely.

Go ahead and reread my last post, noodle it for a bit, then get back to me.


I have a feeling it's rather you who missed the point here.
I just presented a more general viewpoint: No matter if you watch an artistic film or some crap like Transformers just for entertainment during a flight, much will be lost on a tiny screen.

Nobody says you can't be entertained by 5 pixel tall people talking through shitty speakers for 2 hours. You can. It just sucks.

quote:
Originally posted by kamil
some people should be ignored. nobody should watch anything other than hollywood crap on a 2 inch screen.


No matter how shit a film ist, it can be made worse by bad sound and a small picture. And by the smelly dude that keeps talking in the seat behind you on the train.


Posted by Lira on Jan-10-2008 07:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Meat187
By the way, nobody has said anything about the point he's trying to make.

I completely agree with him. You can't properly experience a film without some decent sound and picture quality. I even think watching movies on your notebook sucks.

I disagree. I watched "Grave of the Fireflies" on my girlfriend's notebook, and I don't think I was less moved than I would've been if I had watched it anywhere else.


Posted by mezzir on Jan-10-2008 08:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
I disagree. I watched "Grave of the Fireflies" on my girlfriend's notebook, and I don't think I was less moved than I would've been if I had watched it anywhere else.

Also, Before Sunrise and Before Sunset. Both fucking fantastic movies, but they're essentially just filmed conversation, not unlike Coffee and Cigarettes.


Posted by infinity HiGH on Jan-10-2008 10:23:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
You could't have missed my point more completely.

Go ahead and reread my last post, noodle it for a bit, then get back to me.


Yea, the whole point is you being entertained

Personally I'd rather read a book.

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
I disagree. I watched "Grave of the Fireflies" on my girlfriend's notebook, and I don't think I was less moved than I would've been if I had watched it anywhere else.


It might not affect your emotions as much as appealing to other senses if you were to watch a movie on a big screen with surround sound. Not to get too techy but it also makes a difference whether you're watching in true 5.1 or not.

iPhones, cell phones and Media players are the worst in my opinion. How the hell can anybody watch something on a 4 inch screen? Now that is wrong.


Posted by SuspicionVandit on Jan-10-2008 10:48:

quote:
Originally posted by me&myself
genius


unconfirmed


Posted by Ted Promo on Jan-10-2008 10:56:

quote:
Originally posted by Meat187
And by the smelly dude that keeps talking in the seat behind you on the train.



...or by the morbidly obese couple who love to talk and spill popcorn as their cell phones ring abnormally loudly but they are too fat to reach for them in the theatre...


Posted by Meat187 on Jan-10-2008 11:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Ted Promo
...or by the morbidly obese couple who love to talk and spill popcorn as their cell phones ring abnormally loudly but they are too fat to reach for them in the theatre...


Unfortunately true. Those people are annoying as fuck.


Posted by RJT on Jan-10-2008 15:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Meat187
I have a feeling it's rather you who missed the point here.
I just presented a more general viewpoint: No matter if you watch an artistic film or some crap like Transformers just for entertainment during a flight, much will be lost on a tiny screen.

Nobody says you can't be entertained by 5 pixel tall people talking through shitty speakers for 2 hours. You can. It just sucks.


What point did I miss? That someone else thinks it's shit and/or sucks to watch something on a notebook or PMP screen?

I didn't miss that point - I just don't care about it, much like I don't care about whatever you (or anyone else) thinks is "lost" when watching a film on a notebook or PMP screen. You seem to think I'm advocating a position where watching anything on these devices is better or just as good as experiencing them any other way - so if you could point me to exactly where I said that, I'd really appreciate it so that I can be certain what I'm saying is crystal clear for those of you incapable of reading and comprehending.

So in summary, I haven't missed anything - I just don't care about your (or David Lynch's) opinion on the matter.


Posted by Meat187 on Jan-10-2008 15:58:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
What point did I miss?



The same thing you missed again when you wrote:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
You seem to think I'm advocating a position where watching anything on these devices is better or just as good as experiencing them any other way - so if you could point me to exactly where I said that, I'd really appreciate it so that I can be certain what I'm saying is crystal clear for those of you incapable of reading and comprehending.


You accuse me of not comprehending what you say, while your doing exactly that yourself. What I "seem to think" is not what I do think, and I never said such a thing anywhere. All I did was utter my opinion on this subject.

It's good for you that you don't care for other people's opinions. Please just note two things:
1) Somebody disagreeing with you doesn't mean he misunderstood your arguments or is attacking you personally.
2) I'm right, you're wrong.


Posted by glass on Jan-10-2008 15:58:

It really depends "what" your watching, It's cool to watch a tv show on an ipod, but it really isn't worth it to watch a full length movie. South Park and other show's were there isn't a whole lot of stuff going on the screen are great for ipods.


Posted by RJT on Jan-10-2008 16:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Meat187
The same thing you missed again when you wrote:



You accuse me of not comprehending what you say, while your doing exactly that yourself. What I "seem to think" is not what I do think, and I never said such a thing anywhere. All I did was utter my opinion on this subject.

It's good for you that you don't care for other people's opinions. Please just note two things:
1) Somebody disagreeing with you doesn't mean he misunderstood your arguments or is attacking you personally.
2) I'm right, you're wrong.


Let me just show you one thing quick here:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Great for David Lynch - but if I feel like bringing a laptop, iPod, or any other portable media player on a plane to watch a movie the point is for me to be entertained, not to respect some pretentious twats idea of how "his" film should be watched.


To which your reply was:

quote:
Originally posted by Meat187
Apart from artistic integrity and your obvious dislike towards David Lynch, you can't seriously be claiming that watching a movie (insert your favorite movie here) on an iphone comes close to watching it on the big screen, or on a good system at home. That's like listening to music (insert your favorite track here) on some crappy laptop speakers instead of a decent sound system. So much is lost.
And a track lasts less than 10 mins, a film over 2 hours. Like Lynch says, you're cheated.


Now what is it in your reply that has anything at all to do with the statement I made about wanting a portable entertainment device? Did I say "Watching a movie on an iphone is the same as watching it anywhere else."? Absolutely not.

So regardless of whether or not you were just "offering an opinion", the opinion itself had absolutely nothing to do with the discussion at hand.

Nice try though, someday you'll be able to come up with something relevant.


Posted by Meat187 on Jan-10-2008 16:24:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT

Now what is it in your reply that has anything at all to do with the statement I made about wanting a portable entertainment device?


I pointed out why I think these devices are not suitable for that purpose.

quote:
Originally posted by RJT

Did I say "Watching a movie on an iphone is the same as watching it anywhere else."? Absolutely not.


quote:
Originally posted by Meat187

What I "seem to think" is not what I do think, and I never said such a thing anywhere. All I did was utter my opinion on this subject.


Now excuse me please. I have a more intelligent discussion going on with a loaf of bread right now.


Posted by RJT on Jan-10-2008 16:26:

Oh, sick burn - you got me there.



Again, reading, comprehension, etc. - and regardless, you and David go on having a nice day.

I hear the weather is always perfect in such closed minds.


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.