TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Torq or Serato?
Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »


Posted by DjWoody on Feb-07-2008 19:44:

quote:
Originally posted by sterilis
anyone know why serato bpms all my tracks over 140 as say a track at 140 as 70 or a track at 142 as 71?

is there a way to manually correct them?

cheers


When building your overviews, select a range that's the closest to your tracks. For instance, if all your tracks are EDM, I would select my range to be 88-175. Than all your tracks will be BPM'd correctly. You can BPM tracks individually or in batches. I BPM my hip hop tracks at a much smaller range 68-135, and my rock tracks at a higher range 98-195.

You can always rebuild the overviews to erase the old bpm's and get the new ones. That way you don't have to do the math.


Posted by archaudio on Feb-14-2008 02:02:

I use Virtual DJ and i have no problems at all. I love the program.


Posted by orTof�nChiLd on Feb-18-2008 03:49:

traktor scratch and numark virtual vinyl are best ones

traktor leads in quality while numark owns in latency (zero latency feature)


Posted by djkoolaide on Feb-18-2008 05:57:

quote:
Originally posted by orTof�nChiLd
traktor scratch and numark virtual vinyl are best ones

traktor leads in quality while numark owns in latency (zero latency feature)


fail.


Posted by Jeremy H on Feb-18-2008 14:22:

zero latency is _impossible_.


Posted by archaudio on Feb-18-2008 21:10:

Anybody else besides myself use Virtual DJ?


Posted by miamitranceman on Feb-18-2008 21:17:

quote:
Originally posted by archaudio
Anybody else besides myself use Virtual DJ?


I used to use it a few years ago with a mouse and keyboard before I bought my cdjs and mixer. I taught myself a ot on it in terms of the basics of mixing (beatmatching, phrasing, eqing) and it was a pretty simple transition to hardware.

I've since added Torq to the equation.


Posted by L.A. on Feb-18-2008 21:52:

Torq

I use Torq, it works great and it is very simple to use, never had a problem with it, and although I'm not a pro, I know professional DJs from my country who also use Torq.
Since I never used Serato, I'm not in position of giving you an opinion about which is better.


Posted by archaudio on Feb-19-2008 00:52:

quote:
Originally posted by miamitranceman
I used to use it a few years ago with a mouse and keyboard before I bought my cdjs and mixer. I taught myself a ot on it in terms of the basics of mixing (beatmatching, phrasing, eqing) and it was a pretty simple transition to hardware.

I've since added Torq to the equation.


Awesome. I know that the VDJ program does a lot and i wouldn't mind having 2CDJS and a Mixer but i don't have the money to make the transition yet. I do have a Behringer BCD 2000. It's a mp3 controler that i have mapped to VDJ. At first it crashed when i was setting it up, however after i got it configured it is great. I don't have to touch the mouse or keyboard at all. I noticed that my mixeing is a lot better too since i got it.


Posted by orTof�nChiLd on Feb-19-2008 01:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy H
zero latency is _impossible_.


yeah i didn't believe it myself. The signal has to go through analog to digital and back analog, which is what a DAC does, in less than a milisecond. impressive if you ask me.

www.djdeals.com

check out the features on the numark vinyl system


Posted by miamitranceman on Feb-19-2008 06:12:

quote:
Originally posted by archaudio
Awesome. I know that the VDJ program does a lot and i wouldn't mind having 2CDJS and a Mixer but i don't have the money to make the transition yet. I do have a Behringer BCD 2000. It's a mp3 controler that i have mapped to VDJ. At first it crashed when i was setting it up, however after i got it configured it is great. I don't have to touch the mouse or keyboard at all. I noticed that my mixeing is a lot better too since i got it.



Sweet. Enjoy what you have in the meantime!


Posted by CouchFire on Feb-20-2008 07:04:

quote:
Originally posted by miamitranceman
Haha, you have this list saved don't you?...I think I've seen it before...


For the record Sasha uses Ableton Live....
Fat Boy Slim recently switched to Serato

not sure about the others....

but Mix Master Mike, and Jazzy Jeff use Traktor Scratch
I use Traktor 3.3.1

Serato is very reliable and totaly stable....
but if you tweak your system properly Traktor is the bees knees


Posted by David Househead on Feb-20-2008 17:39:

Jazzy Jeff is a Serato user...
http://scratchlive.net/djs/?dj=jazzy+jeff&details


Posted by CouchFire on Feb-20-2008 18:36:

My bad
I was thinking of Grand Master Flash....
didn't bother to do the research

http://www.native-instruments.com/i...a28adb199746ba5


Posted by Shad0wmaster on Feb-22-2008 19:53:

I own Torq, and have never used Serato, so I can't really pass judgment.

But I did do extensive research on this subject before buying Torq, and the bottom line seems to be that if price is most important to you, get Torq, and if you'd rather have the de-facto standard, go with Serato.

It's like choosing between a Technics 1200 or one of the many competitors.


Posted by miamitranceman on Feb-22-2008 22:42:

Some info on the next version of Torq from the lead designer himself. Check out the tempo anchors.


http://www.sonicstate.com/news/shownews.cfm?newsid=6084


Posted by tortoise on Apr-12-2008 15:08:

by buddy is going to get into djing. hes going to buy some 1200s and he wants to use Traktor Scratch or Serato. can any one offer any help?


Posted by Shad0wmaster on Apr-12-2008 15:14:

If he's going to drop that kind of money, he should get Serato. I've heard quite a lot of complaints about Traktor Scratch being a rather unstable resource hog, but I can't confirm that for myself. What's for sure is that everyone who uses Serato swears by it...


Posted by stan229 on Apr-12-2008 15:23:

alot of the big anmes are going to traktor scratch like hawtin, dubfire, and some more


Posted by T-Soma on Apr-12-2008 17:15:

I have used Serato in clubs, and very frequently live on the radio.
It has never had anything bad happen besides one time at a small party but that was essentially caused by me doing something stupid (Serato did actually keep playing the track and eventually unfreeze itself though).
But I am looking at selling it soon because I am interested in getting a korg zero4 and along with traktor scratch.


Posted by aLviNx80 on Apr-12-2008 18:52:

I've had torq for over a year and never had any problems with it.


Posted by miamitranceman on Apr-12-2008 20:10:

Just gigged today for 4 hours outside on the beach, sand blowin around and all and no probs with Torq.


Posted by Matt Es on Apr-13-2008 03:54:

i own torq and ive gigged with serato,
serato is extremely stable, does the job...love it

been hearing trash about torq, but the only real issue ive had was a low buzzing sound.. other than that its great, tested teh shit out of it.

i figure some people dont like torq's interface and how cluttered it is, , i have no problem with it.
Serato has less going on and its industry standard.

i think the descision is upto the user... and what it is going to be used for.

if i dont make sense its because i had a long day and im exhausted.


Posted by bucke on Apr-14-2008 00:16:

quote:
Originally posted by DjWoody
Serato FTW!!!!

Here's a small list of DJs that use Serato, or have used it until they decided to remix live. I still haven't seen a professional DJ use Torq, or seen a club with a Torq install.

Paul Van Dyk
Sasha
Deep Dish
DJ Am
MSTRKFT
Tommy Lee
Benny Benassi
Pete Tong
Max Graham
Satoshi Tommie


\

um....thats because serato came out before torq and they started using serato before torq came out. do you see the correlation here?


Posted by bucke on Apr-14-2008 00:18:

really the only con torq has compared with serato is the build quality. but it has sooooo much more in terms of features. if you plan on smashing your interface around then get serato it might last longer.


Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.