TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- It's Super Tuesday
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles That may have been due to McCain supporters voting for Huckabee. It was a strategic move to keep Romney from winning the state. |
Drudge has some early numbers up:
http://www.drudgereport.com/
Take them with a whole shaker of salt. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ashish_gupta why not then just vote for mccain? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ashish_gupta why not then just vote for mccain? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles Drudge has some early numbers up: http://www.drudgereport.com/ Take them with a whole shaker of salt. |
CNN seems to have Clinton as the winner in most states:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pr...ts/scorecard/#D
Again, most of the numbers are really preliminary.
It looks like Huckabee will win at least two or three states. May be really close between McCain and Romney...
| quote: |
| On the Democratic side, early indications suggest it could be a long night, according to CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider. Those who made up their mind in the last three days appear to be torn between Obama and Clinton. According to the exit polls, Obama and Clinton are essentially splitting those voters, with 47 percent going for Obama and 46 percent for Clinton. |
If you're an Obama supporter, you've gotta be loving the preliminary exit polls - they have him winning a whole bunch of states (New Jersey!!) that nobody gave him a shot at.
However, they do have him losing California by 3.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/177150.php
The way the Dem primaries work is proportional delegation though - so even a "loss" in a state will garner a candidate representation at the convention in August. So an Obama 2% loss in California may cost him 12 delegates, but a 50% win in Georgia could net him 40 more than HRC making Georgia the more important result.
For the GOP, most states are winner-take-all, which makes some of those races much more important in the context of the final nomination - especially California, where it is a toss-up between Romney and McCain.
But in any case, it looks like it could be a good night for Obama - this morning's opinion poll aggregates had Hillary winning 12 contests to Obama's 9... but exit polls show 11 in the Obama category potentially.
| quote: |
| PSA: Super Duper Tuesday voting machines could be at risk Attention voters: if you're casting your ballot for a special someone on this Super Duper Tuesday, you might want to hear what the folks over at Common Cause have to say. The nonpartisan, nonprofit voting machine watchdog wants you to know that six out of the 24 states involved in the presidential primaries today are using voting machines that are at "high risk" for malfunction or tampering. In all, 17 states have some risk factor -- based on the advocacy group's rating system -- though the machines in Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, and Tennessee are the most likely to give the votes to Darth Vader, Dr. Evil, or Lord Voldemort. You have been warned. Source: Engadget |
| quote: |
| Six states at �high� risk for voting machine mishaps on Super Tuesday Six of the 15 states that hold presidential primaries on Super Tuesday are at �high� risk for having election results affected by electronic voting machine malfunction or tampering, according to a new report by Common Cause and the Verified Voting Foundation. Twenty-four states hold presidential primaries or caucuses on Feb. 5, but only 15 of them will use voting machines to select candidates. In all, a troubling 17 states that will hold their presidential primaries over the next several months, including two that have already held them, are at high risk for voting machine mishaps that could change election results, the report shows. The states were given that ranking for using electronic voting machines that do not produce an independent, voter-verifiable paper record that could be used in the case of a recount or audit. In addition, the report found 17 states to be at �medium� risk for having election results affected by voting machine failure. This classification was given to states that use voting systems that deploy paper ballots or produce a voter-verifiable paper record of each voter�s vote, but do not require audits. The report found six states to be at �low� risk for a voting meltdown because those states use voting systems that deploy paper ballots or produce voter verifiable paper records, as well as require audits. �It is senseless that after two presidential elections marked by voting machine failures that some states still use voting systems that do not produce a paper record that can be re-counted if there is a problem,� said Bob Edgar, president of Common Cause. �Congress and the states must fix this problem by November. We can�t afford another national election in which voters don�t have full confidence in our election results.� "The predominant voting systems we use, which tally electronically, have been shown repeatedly to have significant security and reliability weaknesses,� said Pamela Smith, president of the Verified Voting Foundation. �But where voters are able to check that their vote was recorded accurately on paper, that paper forms a tool we can use to reduce the threat. Post election audits using the paper ballots are the most important check and balance on the electronic tally." The ratings for the 15 states holding presidential primaries on voting machines on Super Tuesday are below. Forty states, including the District of Columbia, are reviewed inside the report. The remaining states were not reviewed since they hold caucuses and do not use electronic voting machines. Source: Common Cause |
Here's the big page for results on CNN, updated regularly:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pr...dates/#20080205
Exit polls have Clinton winning Tennessee, Arkansas, and Oklahoma, and Obama winning Georgia and Illinois (of course).
Everybody:
What are your thoughts on the idea that McCain might win the Republican primary, then choose Huckabee as a running mate to woo the evangelicals? Plausible?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles Everybody: What are your thoughts on the idea that McCain might win the Republican primary, then choose Huckabee as a running mate to woo the evangelicals? Plausible? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Clovis Just keep Romney away. Far far away. |
CNN has Clinton winning New York (of course).
My impression so far is that Clinton and McCain will come out the winners today. And if that happens...
...I'm not guaranteeing anything, but say hello to another four years of a hawkish Republican presidency. 
Christ, Hillary vs McCain? God... I'm not even sure if I'd bother voting in the main election. Both are inept candidates. I think McCain scares me more since he seems like more of a politically loose cannon.
Obama has Delaware, according to CNN.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT I am not sure any user has ever confirmed their idiocy more thoroughly in one post than you have here. Bravo Miss Ania, bravo.  |
lol
Obama is having a good night. As is mother nature. Where's Will when you need him? Thirty tornadoes on the ground - that's excitement!
Wow, looks like Huckabee has at least five states. McCain seems to be picking up most of them, though.
It looks to me like Romney might be finished after tonight. He's getting beat by Huckabee, and McCain is far ahead of both of them.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles Wow, looks like Huckabee has at least five states. McCain seems to be picking up most of them, though. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles It looks to me like Romney might be finished after tonight. He's getting beat by Huckabee, and McCain is far ahead of both of them. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.