TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Promotion
-- The Epic Mix [Epic House]
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by Plastick on Mar-25-2008 07:51:

Re: The Epic Mix [Epic House]

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
After two retro mixes of basically playing just well known classics,


Something OOT, but do you have them?


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Mar-25-2008 14:14:

The breakdown in "Set in Stone" is my ideal of how breakdowns should work -- a short and ecstatic interlude in a track, no silly beatless buildup, and then the kick comes slamming back in.


Posted by RJT on Mar-25-2008 14:21:

I'm quite glad you're back into making sets on the regular - will be checking this one out this week.

I still need to post my thoughts on the '93 mix too - but will still briefly state how awesomely brooding and deep it was.



Keep up the good work - will be back to you on this one in a few days.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-25-2008 15:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Plastick
Something OOT, but do you have them?


Check my sig, my man. The links still work, although you'll have to use the Perma-link for the '95 one.

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
I still need to post my thoughts on the '93 mix too - but will still briefly state how awesomely brooding and deep it was.


Thanks a lot. I always assume that people who download it and then don't report back basically thought it was shite. Hope you enjoy this one too.


Posted by eRRaTiK on Mar-25-2008 16:59:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I always assume that people who download it and then don't report back basically thought it was shite.


nope, we're just too lazy or don't know how to review the mix beyond "i like it" or "it sux dogs balls"


Posted by RJT on Mar-25-2008 22:02:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J

Thanks a lot. I always assume that people who download it and then don't report back basically thought it was shite. Hope you enjoy this one too.


Nah, that's not it at all - just an incredibly busy semester at Uni with a trip to Europe plopped right in the middle, so I have far less time to write as many in depth reviews as I'd like.

I'll definitely get back to you on both - though I'm sure they'll both have proven to be quality.


Posted by bubbleguuum on Mar-25-2008 23:33:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Yeah, that's what I was getting at with my remarks about percussion. It feels like a lot of producers today try to compensate for a lack of musical ideas by making their percussion really complex and full and / or putting tons of effects on whatever music they do have. The reason for that is plain to see: it's a hell of a lot of easier for most people to generate five or ten cool-sounding percussion loops and apply nifty effects than it is for them to (1) come up with memorable melodies like the ones in the tracks in your mix and (2) put them together in a track such that it actually feels like it has a logical *direction.*

A lot of modern productions feel kind of random to me, in that it doesn't really seem like the producer had any sense of how one part should lead to the next, but tried stuff pretty much at random until something felt right.

It's the same idea I've expressed in other threads: What the "musician" side of an electronic musician lacks, the "electronic" side of him tries desperately to supply.


You sum up pretty well my feeling toward current released music: most of it is generic, forgettable, soulless, goes nowhere as it lacks good composition. But it' super glossy according to today "is well produced" standard, which means it will probably sound bad tomorrow anyway. And this "well produced" is totally subjective as it depends of the epoch and there's some older music (listen to some biosphere from 1992 and be amazed) that sound wonderful even if not using today's so called fucking standard that makes every tune sound the same.

Anyway I'll take a well composed tune badly mastered over a bland shiny glossy tunes any day...I even bought a few obscure amazing tracks that are not super well mastered, but so great it has zero importance....


Posted by coded audio on Mar-26-2008 00:39:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Yeah.

As far as dance music, I've been listening mostly to early and mid '90s stuff lately, and it seems to have an energy and freshness that most of today's stuff can't touch. I'm not sure what exactly it is. Maybe the fact that people had far fewer fancy tools and glossy effects forced them to focus more on creativity with music and synthesis rather than on giving everything the right sheen to make it sound "release-worthy."


I do agree with that. Another difference is that composers of this era were mostly using lovely warm analogue desks and synthesizers to generate sounds and master. Today you have all of these soft synths and effects overload and programs like buzz and reason etc etc that just dont sound as good as the older style of production IMO.

Another contentious point I will make is there is not the quality of artist in these genres that there was 10 years ago. They have moved into different styles of music now .


Posted by Plastick on Mar-26-2008 07:59:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Check my sig, my man. The links still work, although you'll have to use the Perma-link for the '95 one.



quote:
Mixes:
>Progressive '93 [Prog House]
>Spirit of '95 [Epic House]


You're saying this?


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-26-2008 13:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Plastick
You're saying this?


Yeah, those are the links to the threads. Each thread has a link for the mix within, below the tracklist.


Posted by RJT on Mar-27-2008 14:19:

I've finally had a chance to give this one a few proper listens now and have to say that much like both of your other efforts, this is the kind of evidence that people with mindsets like you should be doing these kinds of compilations for release - not the mindless fucks at Positivia, MoS, or whichever other label du jour is going to license a bunch of similar (or worse) tunes for a "classic" comp.

Of the three from you this one I probably knew about as many of the tunes going in as in the '93 (so a fair bit more than the '95 one), but it really brought back some fond memories of fairly old sets. The section running 9 through 13 is without a doubt the most soundly put together section of this set, though that isn't to say I didn't enjoy the beginning - the mixes/flow just got a bit disjointed for me after the first mix (which was impeccable), but this isn't to say the mix felt without flow, because it did - I just thought it came across better in the end.

Keep up the good work.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-27-2008 23:40:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
...that isn't to say I didn't enjoy the beginning - the mixes/flow just got a bit disjointed for me after the first mix (which was impeccable), but this isn't to say the mix felt without flow, because it did - I just thought it came across better in the end.


In complete honesty, I thought the first mix was the jarring one and I really liked the sequence of the next three or four tracks. Equally, I thought that this was the more obscure tracklist compared to the others. This is always the problem- the creator can never judge his/her own work accurately.

Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for the review.


Posted by Armitage on Apr-02-2008 17:20:

Thumbs up

Really like the tracks you picked!


Posted by leph555 on Apr-03-2008 11:16:

The word "epic" pretty much does sum up this set

awesome job!


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Apr-03-2008 15:13:

Thanks both of you, for the praise and also for the timely bump.


Posted by GoSpeedGo! on Apr-03-2008 15:25:

I'd really like to listen to this, but megaupload just never works for me here. No free slots ever.

Can anyone upload it somewhere else? Judging by the responses so far, this deserves it.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Apr-03-2008 15:43:

I can put it up on Rapidshare later. Unfortunately I don't have any perma-hosting.


Posted by GoSpeedGo! on Apr-03-2008 16:33:

Rapidshare is fine. Thanks!


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Apr-04-2008 01:22:

Ah bollocks- Rapidshare's limit is 100mb for free users. Can anyone recommend another site?


Posted by GoSpeedGo! on Apr-04-2008 06:56:

[[ LINK REMOVED ]]


Posted by ohbeone on Apr-09-2008 18:40:

I love this thread.
Downloading the mix now. I haven't touched my tables but maybe 5 times in that many years but since I found this site I've been wanting to put a mix together of some of the most memorable tracks in my collection which also hail back to the '95 - '99 era. The best IMO like others have expressed here. I can tell by the tracklist this is going to be a great mix. Thank you for doing this. I really think if more people heard this they would realize how crappy today's mainstream stuff is.

To add a bit to the conversation too, I think the increased availability of technology for any joe schmoe to make EDM has also brought on a lot of the crap. Definitely not musicians but just people who like good beats putting something together themselves but not really 'working' on it. There are lots of people who can make beats or tracks, but few who can make good EDM songs that actually go anywhere or seem to have a purpose beyond a 'danceable' beat.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Apr-09-2008 21:06:

quote:
Originally posted by paulandrews
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]


I still haven't done this, due to moving back into my university accomodation. I haven't forgotten, and I'll try and do it tomorrow.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Apr-12-2008 14:27:

Finally got the chance to do this. New upload link for anyone who can't use Megaupload:

http://uploaded.to/?id=dx2p1y


Posted by THE_Chris on Apr-12-2008 15:11:

Missed this thread.

Downloading


Posted by THE_Chris on Apr-12-2008 21:26:

This is completely different to anything I usually listen to.

Its a very good set. Theres a lot of vocal work in there but none of it is cheesy at all. Overall, great stuff


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.