TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Sex takes 3 to 13 minutes
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

quote:

Originally posted by barbina i love that you guys supply me with ways to connect it to anything

How ungay of you.

quote:

Originally posted by Audious I like how you feel the need to mention that you're gay in nearly every post you make. Oh, by the way, I'm straight.

personally i don't like it. it's really annoying and makes one suspect the whole "i'm gay" thing is nothing but a derranged belief that somehow it will get her more attention.

but this behaviour (attention seeking through all means necessary) is typically female and therefore doesn't surprise me.

i became bored with her constant reminders of her sexuality about 2 months ago and suggest you do the same, leaving it to those of us in the 13-17 age group that probably don't know any better.

"OMG Dudes look! A lesbian!"

quote:

Originally posted by denys envy personally i don't like it. it's really annoying and makes one suspect the whole "i'm gay" thing is nothing but a derranged belief that somehow it will get her more attention. but this behaviour (attention seeking through all means necessary) is typically female and therefore doesn't surprise me. i became bored with her constant reminders of her sexuality about 2 months ago and suggest you do the same, leaving it to those of us in the 13-17 age group that probably don't know any better. "OMG Dudes look! A lesbian!"

Pictures and videos can, of course, nullify the aforementioned suggestion of ignoring and implication of annoyance.

quote:

Originally posted by denys envy personally i don't like it. it's really annoying and makes one suspect the whole "i'm gay" thing is nothing but a derranged belief that somehow it will get her more attention. but this behaviour (attention seeking through all means necessary) is typically female and therefore doesn't surprise me. i became bored with her constant reminders of her sexuality about 2 months ago and suggest you do the same, leaving it to those of us in the 13-17 age group that probably don't know any better. "OMG Dudes look! A lesbian!"

I still love you. Its okay <3

quote:

Originally posted by david.michael Pictures and videos can, of course, nullify the aforementioned suggestion of ignoring and implication of annoyance.

well that goes without saying. everytime she mentions she's a lesbian and posts a video fully proving the fact, i'm alright with it.

quote:

Originally posted by denys envy well that goes without saying. everytime she mentions she's a lesbian and posts a video fully proving the fact, i'm alright with it.

I'll get right on that... one day

now back to this 3 minute business... I hope you all go home and work on lasting longer than that. I feel bad for the people who think that 3 minutes is "quite enough"

quote:

Originally posted by barbina people who think that 3 minutes is "quite enough"

A lot of people on this line of thinking have been trained as such by their partners who fake orgasms, IMO.

Don't fake the 'gasms, ladies... you're only hurting yourself.

quote:

Originally posted by david.michael A lot of people on this line of thinking have been trained as such by their partners who fake orgasms, IMO.

Sure, but we've kind of conditioned women to do that by fakeing that we actually care.

If you are anal, multiply your time X2.

or divide it

quote:

Originally posted by Moral Hazard Sure, but we've kind of conditioned women to do that by fakeing that we actually care.

Touche, sir.

Ugh what a horrible, horrible article. Journalism covering research is usually pretty lacking but this really goes above and beyond the usual level of failure.

The article begins by describing the conclusion that 3 to 13 minutes as "the optimal amount of time for sexual intercourse." But most of the text seems to focus instead on the actual typical duration of intercourse, e.g. "the median time for sexual intercourse was 7.3 minutes." As if to conflate the issues even more, the title is "Sex Takes 3 to 13 Minutes, Study Says." (Shouldn�t it be "Survey Says?" -- cue Family Feud)

What is optimal and what is typical don't seem to necessarily have very much do to with one another, so it seems to me that one of them is out of place in the article. Furthermore, the claims made beg elucidation as to how these conclusions were reached, and the article really gives no meaningful insight into that.

In the first place, saying a particular measure is "optimal" with no point of reference is pretty meaningless. In order for it to mean something, we would want to know what it is optimal for. Even if we did know, the article describes the source of this claim as "a survey of sex therapists." But we don't actually know what the sex therapists were asked, or how they responded.

Beyond that, I'm not sure how much credibility I find in some "sex therapist's" declaration of what the "optimal" time is for intercourse. But one thing I can say for sure, is I find it much more credible than this shit:

quote:

Dr. Irwin Goldstein, editor of the Journal of Sexual Medicine, cited a four-week study of 1,500 couples in 2005 that found the median time for sexual intercourse was 7.3 minutes. (Women in the study were armed with stopwatches.)

Now, I don't know what instructions the study participants were given, but even if I did, I wouldn't trust that they actually followed them properly. I mean, I'm trying to picture the scenario here:

Man: "Okay, I'm about to commence with penetration!"
Woman: Hold on, I have to get the stopwatch!"
...

And then what, does the woman try to time it so she stops the stopwatch simultaneously with the man's ejaculation? I have a hard time believing that people actually did this, much less accurately. And we have to assume that the psychological effect of being "timed" wouldn't affect anyone involved at all, which seems unlikely.

All in all, this article doesn't really provide any information because it's so badly written and poorly organized that it leads one to believe the author may well have woefully misunderstood the survey(s)/studies/what-have-you being reported upon. For all I know, maybe 3 to 13 minutes was really the amount of time spent on this piece of shit article and had nothing to do with the survey.

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter Ugh what a horrible, horrible article. Journalism covering research is usually pretty lacking

Isn't that the unfortunate truth?

Makes me wonder what makes good journalism these days.

quote:

Originally posted by barbina I'll get right on that... one day now back to this 3 minute business... I hope you all go home and work on lasting longer than that. I feel bad for the people who think that 3 minutes is "quite enough"

And how long would be optimal then? Perhaps one of the guys here can last long enough to "turn" you(the ads you get for this thread could defenitly help)?

I wouldn't really know... although I possibly could quite soon.


QUICK we need a panel of experts!

quote:

Originally posted by Darkarbiter QUICK we need a panel of experts!

quote:

Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles

Ahahahaha, so much better when someone else does it.

I've always done my best work in twenty minutes or less...not counting the hour of foreplay, ofcourse.

Im thankful for this study. I find that sex longer than 10 minutes is exhausting and painful.

You just don't like your boyfriend

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.