TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Next stop on Yonge line . . . 'Home Depot'?
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

quote:

Originally posted by MarkT The Sheppard line is hardly nostalgic at all, right? Well, Bessarion (sp?) is about 100m or so from IKEA. Why not examine some way to link those two entities? Would anyone be offended or upset if that became "IKEA Station"? Where you could actually buy shit there and link directly to the subway line? It's a huge win for IKEA, the TTC and the public. There is room to be creative too...it doesn't JUST have to be big, evil corporations like Rogers, Bell, etc. who are involved. UofT and Ryerson sure seem to have some spare change these days. Ryerson is expanding at a ridiculous clip (even contemplating tearing down and rebuilding Kerr Hall). They are relocating their student centre to the old Sam's location and are really building up that area. So why not "Ryerson Station" instead of Dundas station? Expansion up to York means getting York, the students and surrounding businesses involved.

I agree with all of this. The problem is, there is no real relevance to any station being called the "Pepsi Station" or the "Bell Station" or the "Rogers Station" etc.

This will only work for a few landmarks, and maybe a head office or two.

Wasn't this in large part how they started building the Sheppard line? It basically goes from mall to mall.

I love the "dangerous precedent" comment about "privatizing public space". Who exactly decided that subway stations should be "public space?" Does the existence of government housing imply that apartments are "public space?"

Most big cities also privatize many or most of their roads and highways. Generally the result of that is - surprise! - better roads and highways.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have an appointment at the corner of RIM and Preparation H.

I support this only if it doesn't replace the entire station name. The following is acceptable and wouldn't look that bad.



It'd be cool if the whole station was set up like a McDonald's restaurant and you could buy food. If it's not a practical choice to have the store inside the station then they should build it so that it's underneathe/extremely close to one (example - walmart). This would obviously limit advertisers for existing stations.

A "Subway" station would hilarious.

Anything done tastefully that will give TTC more money is a great idea. A city like Toronto should have at least double or triple the amount of station stops there are now.

quote:

Originally posted by DigiNut I love the "dangerous precedent" comment about "privatizing public space". Who exactly decided that subway stations should be "public space?" Does the existence of government housing imply that apartments are "public space?" Most big cities also privatize many or most of their roads and highways. Generally the result of that is - surprise! - better roads and highways.

While I don't dispute the face that privatization has lead to better roadways, when you privatize public spaces (ie. town squares) you effectively lose your right to freedom of expression and other civil liberties.

Want to organize an event about global warming in meeting place x? Too bad, Exxon owns meeting place x and has banned people from doing so.

^^^ and how does that in any way apply to a subway car, line or station that is still owned and operated by the TTC, with the private sectore obtaining naming rights, a lease, etc?

We're talking about TTC not public space such as parks. Are subway stations, lines and cars not *TTC property*?

the main stumbling block (IMHO) would be that long-term deals would need to be in place to avoid constant renaming, renovation, etc.

quote:

Originally posted by MarkT ^^^ and how does that in any way apply to a subway car, line or station that is still owned and operated by the TTC, with the private sectore obtaining naming rights, a lease, etc? We're talking about TTC not public space such as parks. Are subway stations, lines and cars not *TTC property*? the main stumbling block (IMHO) would be that long-term deals would need to be in place to avoid constant renaming, renovation, etc.

Sure it applies. McDonalds pres. King Station could be a Burger King ban zone... lol

Public space or not, I still say its a slippery slope.

quote:

Originally posted by DigiNut [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#99CCEE]Most big cities also privatize many or most of their roads and highways. Generally the result of that is - surprise! - better roads and highways.

Do you have any specific examples of this? The only local implementation I have seen was the 407, and I am still not sure who benefited more on the deal.

quote:

Originally posted by Dave Akermanis Sure it applies. McDonalds pres. King Station could be a Burger King ban zone... lol Public space or not, I still say its a slippery slope.

great...but that's illogical.

you just created (however tongue in cheek) an analogy between infringing upon our right to peaceful assembly with corporate exclusivity agreements on private property?

lol...FAIL

quote:

Originally posted by Orko Do you have any specific examples of this? The only local implementation I have seen was the 407, and I am still not sure who benefited more on the deal.

A Globe & Mail article on this topic noted that Dubai (filty rich country) is contemplating selling naming rights to some transit properties, IIRC.

The 407 deal was disasterous because they 407 consortium was given *way* too much authority and revenues were given up.

The TTC could retain full ownership and operation of the system and properties with very specific leases that clearly spell out what the private sector can and cannot do.

Fares still 100% go to TTC, while relinquising all ad and retail lease revenues to the private sector. I think it's easy enough to manage this. The opposition is idealogical in nature...not because of a lack of feasibility.

Needs must in this situation

And for those of you who like to know which side of the train to get off - this guide is ACE

http://www.ttcrider.ca/

quote:

Originally posted by English Rachel Needs must in this situation And for those of you who like to know which side of the train to get off - this guide is ACE http://www.ttcrider.ca/

This one is the best:

The orange dot on six-car subway platforms can be used as an easy way to remember where to wait for the train on the platform, so that when you get to your destination station, you're lined up near the stairs or escalators. The orange dot is attached to the wall in each subway station and lines up to approximately the 3rd car, 3rd door of each train.

Destination stations where the orange dot is useful:

* Bathurst (eastbound and westbound)
* Bay (eastbound and westbound)
* Broadview (eastbound)
* Castle Frank (eastbound)
* Chester (eastbound and westbound)
* Christie (eastbound and westbound)
* Coxwell (westbound)
* Davisville (eastbound and westbound)
* Donlands (eastbound)
* Dufferin (eastbound and westbound)
* Dupont (northbound and southbound)
* Eglinton (northbound and southbound)
* Finch (northbound and southbound)
* Islington (eastbound and westbound)
* Jane (eastbound and westbound)
* Kennedy
* King (northbound and southbound)
* Main Street (eastbound)
* North York Centre (southbound)
* Osgoode (northbound and southbound)
* Pape (eastbound and westbound)
* Queen's Park (northbound)
* Runnymede (eastbound and westbound)
* Sheppard (northbound and southbound)
* Sherbourne (westbound)
* St. Andrew (northbound)
* St. George (eastbound, westbound, northbound and southbound)
* St. Patrick (southbound)
* Union (westbound � towards University line)
* Victoria Park (eastbound)
* Warden (eastbound and westbound)
* Wellesley (southbound)
* Wilson (northbound and southbound)
* Yonge (westbound)


A simple way to remember which stations are orange dot stations is to remember them as an acronym:
BBBCCCCDDDDDEFIJKKMNOPQRSSSSSUVWWWY
Pronounce it out like a word and remember it by the way it sounds.

quote:

Originally posted by English Rachel http://www.ttcrider.ca/

Been here before. Great site. I love the quirky stations section


Scarborough Centre:

* has more connecting bus routes than any other station

Sheppard-Yonge:

* was almost named Princess station after Lady Di

Osgoode:

* persistent rumours exist that there is a roughed-in station beneath the main station. Likely an urban legend


I came across a site one time that had the tile designs of many TTC Subway Stations

Re: Next stop on Yonge line . . . 'Home Depot'?

quote:

Originally posted by MarkT several people, myself included, have been suggesting this for some time now. If the various levels of gov't can't/won't fund our woefully inadequate public transit system, then let's get the private sector involved! (so long as it's 'naming rights' alone, along with retail space, etc. and no 'control' over the stations/service/etc). I think this is a great idea...though retaining certain stops, named for historical reasons, is fine too. But do we care if it's "College", "Dundas" or "Home Depot", "Rogers"? no! http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/417766

Whoa, We actually agree on something for once. Im amused LOL!

quote:

Originally posted by Dave Akermanis None of you see a problem with the privatization of public spaces? Whats next? The park around the corner will turn into the "Pepsi Max Parkette" ?? I think this sets a dangerous precedent.

Who cares? If it means lower taxes then let those "evil corperations" pay for it!

Have the "CN"(Canadian National Railway) tower or "Hummingbird" centre made toronto any less of a city?

quote:

Originally posted by Dave Akermanis While I don't dispute the face that privatization has lead to better roadways, when you privatize public spaces (ie. town squares) you effectively lose your right to freedom of expression and other civil liberties. Want to organize an event about global warming in meeting place x? Too bad, Exxon owns meeting place x and has banned people from doing so.

Nothing would change. Currently you need permission from the TTC to perform, protest, sell anything, or even loiter on their system.

I read a good point in one of the newspapers.

Yorkdale station was named after a mall and the TTC never got a dime for it. The station does not refer to any street names yet people still dont get confused.

IDeally we shouldnt have to rename these stations but since the socialist pigs at city hall dont want to cut the waste, there really isnt any other choice. Especially now that they pretty much caved in and gave the TTC union everything they wanted. I predict fare hikes within 3 months.

My TTC videos.

TTC Subway Train passes another one going the other way.



TTC RT vs. Go Train!!

do it!

best idea ever.

Some places don't have a large store around them and of course the streets would have to be included with the name but it's do-able.


CIBC Ossington Station

The streetname has to be included for visitors to the city that wouldn't know where the heck they are.

quote:

Originally posted by StereoPrincess where the heck they are.

watch your language!

quote:

Originally posted by Dave Akermanis While I don't dispute the face that privatization has lead to better roadways, when you privatize public spaces (ie. town squares) you effectively lose your right to freedom of expression and other civil liberties. Want to organize an event about global warming in meeting place x? Too bad, Exxon owns meeting place x and has banned people from doing so.

So I ask my question again: who decided that subway stations should be public space? Is that an ideal place to hold a demonstration?

Anyway, as Jay pointed out, you need permission from the TTC to do anything in a station anyway. It's very hard to get. You can't just waltz into Bloor station and start throwing pro-life pamphlets at people.

quote:

Originally posted by kotsy Been here before. Great site. I love the quirky stations section Sheppard-Yonge: * was almost named Princess station after Lady Di

it was actually Bayview station being considered for the name

quote:

Originally posted by English Rachel Needs must in this situation And for those of you who like to know which side of the train to get off - this guide is ACE http://www.ttcrider.ca/

Awesome link, Rach.

Hahah, I like these:



If traveling with a mobility device (wheelchair, stroller), please use elevators.





Do not put bombs in the trash cans.

I think private corporation sponsorship will become the norm....cities need money and they can only take so much from the citizens. This isn't a new concept by any means......I've seen many highway that have portions of it adopted by corporations.

Branding subway stations really isn't much of a stretch from the current barrage of low grade adverts we already have. In fact it probably would generate more income and make stations look nicer - with consistent and more permanent installations compared to the ugly "wraps" they have up at major stations.

I don't know why these TTC cronies like Joe Mehevic would be so opposed to this idea. Maybe its because it is a real solution for their so called funding problems? From what I gather they really don't care about real solutions. Its about a political agenda that goes beyond creating a better transit system.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.