TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- The ban-wagon rolls on... plastic bags, phones, electronics yet to be invented!
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »


Posted by jchung52 on May-28-2008 18:02:

Re: Re: Re: The ban-wagon rolls on... plastic bags, phones, electronics yet to be inv

quote:
Originally posted by Djsketchbag
Unless you live in Walkerton.


or london. you turn on the tap and all you smell is metal


Posted by Jayx1 on May-28-2008 18:05:

When i was a kid i lived in stouffville and the garbage dump on the moraine was polluting the municpal ground water. We were forced to buy water (at that time sold in glass bottles). No one back then ever thought of asking for government compensation either. I guess it was an era just before the "everyone owes me something just because im me" phase in our society.

I remember the water being brown and dirty.


Posted by The Ear on May-28-2008 18:34:

Now I know why you're so uppity at times. lol.

Stoufville eh?

I lived in that shit hole, backwater, incest pit for 2 years & nearly chewed my leg off to get out. It took me a while to purge those days from my head. Good luck though man. Once you finally get rid of all that you'll realize that the ones making these decisions aren't the townies that will actually listen to an argument from time to time.

Either way, don't stop the rants. I love 'em, and the reaction they solicit even more.

Cheers!


Posted by exstasie on May-28-2008 19:12:

quote:
Originally posted by jsibilin
wow,, thats news to me,, i've never seen those bins in toronto.. they have wheels on them too.. And there great for the suburbs so that those damn raccoons don't get in your garbage. What is the Dark blue bins for ? i am guessing just paper?


Nope...It's for you ACTUAL garbage...

So anything that's not Recycling. It is a form of tax for the government, as Jay mentioned already lol, and I think there's an annual fee now? or maybe just talks of one...


Posted by Abercrombie on May-28-2008 20:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
I remember the water being brown and dirty.


I notice the water like that in Aurora, each time the city adds a chemical to flush the rust off of pipes.


Posted by smuncky on May-28-2008 20:05:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
You remind me of Lisa Simpson.



LOL! post of the thread.


Posted by Engine9 on May-28-2008 20:28:


Posted by VDub on May-28-2008 22:49:

I agree with Jay 100%...

The gov sees us paying for so many other rip offs that they figure we'll just take it when they come up with new ones...

The sad thing is...we do...take it all...with no lube...


Posted by jonnystel on May-28-2008 23:13:

Re: The ban-wagon rolls on... plastic bags, phones, electronics yet to be invented!

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
-Plastic bags at the liquor store. I guess theyd rather kill a tonne of trees with paper rather than use recyclable plastic bags. FYI paper bags get an average of 1 use while plastic bags get reused 2 to four times.


Your an idiot dude... the paper bags they use are RECYCLED. even if it gets used once which it always does.. its good cuz that recycled paper bag takes around a year if not less to break down at a garbage dump. or for those who recycle it . it can be made into something else!!.. whereas that plastic bag your so in love with takes over 1000 years to break itself down.. im all for using the paper bags for something like liquor\

No matter what they do. theres always people that bitch and bitch about bla bla im paying my taxes for this . rah rah rah .. it is what it is get used to it .


Posted by jonnystel on May-28-2008 23:13:

Re: Re: The ban-wagon rolls on... plastic bags, phones, electronics yet to be invente

.
quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
- plastic bags in all retail stores. Again, cant wait for the mess of paper bags that tear and shred before you even make it to the car. Cant wait for the chemically treated paper bags to get thrown out instead of resued. Makes for great showboating politics but not very practical.

- Plastic water bottles. Many school boards are already banning them (after banning pop) and now the province might do the same. I guess they want us to drink from the lead coated pipes in schools and parks. If i were in the business id have a few solutions.

1) define what is water. Water is H20. As soon as you add calcium, iron, etc its no longer water is it? Otherwise wed have to call juice, pop and anything else liquid as water right? Id just change the label from water to "Calcium drink"

2) Canned Water - worse for the environment as you have to mine materials and smelter the can but hey, at least its not plastic water bottles!!
!


Oh man.. dude. seriously.??

Plastic bags being banned in stores is friggin genius.. saves money and landfill space.. soon its gonna be . ok . u buy ur groceries . roll the cart to ur truck . and put the shit inside . big deal. or you bring your own bags. that you can actually reuse.

Plastic water bottles too.. whats the point . everyone should stop being lazy and have on or 2 reusable bottles and keep filling them up.. jsut like some ppl do with coffee thermos's and mugs..

Water in Canada is safe to drink.. they add certain shit to it like fluoride but its all essential minerals that you body needs jeeze its not poison. and about the lead thing.. most places like schools and public buildings get tested quite frequently for lead in the water. and trust me its not something they take lightly

And yea canned water would be awesome!. why not... that CAN if recycled can be directly turned into a new can. and if thrown away takes half the amount of years to break itself down as opposed to a plastic water bottle ... but im sure noone on this site cares about this shit..

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
Who voted for the Liberals? Wasnt me!


Nope! it was me. and I'm sure as hell doing it next election!.


Posted by MarkT on May-28-2008 23:17:

Re: The ban-wagon rolls on... plastic bags, phones, electronics yet to be invented!

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
...
(my parents did this and i grew up fine!)
...


highly debateable.


Posted by Abercrombie on May-28-2008 23:26:

Why don't all stores have biodegradeable plastic bags like they do at the Body Shop, and charge a nickel for them like we do at No Frills?


Posted by MarkT on May-29-2008 00:19:

the paper vs. plastic bag debate is FAR more complex than is being discussed here.

you need to evaluate the aggregate cost of producing the product from the very beginning. this includes harvesting/processing the raw materials, labour used, energy used, transport costs, etc. etc. etc. That analysis alone is probably ridiculous in scope.

you also need to consider the life cycle of the product. is it used once, twice? for a day, a year? is it reusable? recyclable? or is it just waste at the end? what happens to that waste? does it just 'harmlessly' occupy space (which is finite) or does it degrade and contaminate ecosystems, which then must be treated (and that spinoff cost has to factor into the overall analysis too)

you need to look at all costs ($$$, energy used, etc.) to dispose of or recycle the products. Just becuase two things are recyclable doesn't mean it costs the same, or uses the same energy, to do so.

also factor in that not all areas possess identical facilities to even recycle or dispose of plastic and paper and now your analysis changes depending upon what area you're looking at!

even with all that, I'm sure that I'm just skimming the surface of how complex the analysis of "what's better, paper or plastic" truly is...and that's assuming that those who are capable of this can even agree on the parameters of analysis in the first place.

ignoring ALL costs to produce, use, and dispose of or recycle a product is extremely short-sighted and is why most people favour paper bags. They think 'paper is recyclable...therefore paper must be better". it's far from that simple and some studies claim that the opposite is true...that when examining a wider range of factors, plastic may actually be "better".

'efficiency' is another short-sighted goal. of course improving efficiency is good...but efficiency doesn't address overall consumption. There's a reason that the phrase is "reduce, reuse, recycle" IN THAT ORDER.

Reducing overally consumption should be the ultimate goal...from start to finish. are we really "ahead" if cars become twice as efficient in 10 years, but there are 5 times as many of them on the road by that time? it's better than having no improvement in efficiency, but overall fuel consumption is still WAY up, isn't it! This is the very problem occuring in Asia with the rise of the middle class. FAR more people have cars today than before...so you can make all the "efficiency" improvements you want...it's not addressing the incredible rise in consumption, just mitigating it.

*sigh*

so the gov't, school boards, LCBO, etc. etc. When they implement these policies...I really wonder HOW CLOSE of a look are they taking at the overall issue or is it a knee jerk reaction based upon a flawed or incomplete analysis?


Posted by smuncky on May-29-2008 00:47:

Re: Re: The ban-wagon rolls on... plastic bags, phones, electronics yet to be invented!

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
highly debateable.


this is now the post of the thread lol!


Posted by Orko on May-29-2008 04:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1 you confuse bottled water with water bottles. Water bottles (hard plastic) is being banned because of BPA. Soft plastic bottles are being done away with because of "recycling concerns"


once again, get your facts right. Baby bottles are being banned, but you can still buy water bottles (nalgenes) with BPA. Sellers are voluntarily taking them off the market, but they are not going to be banned.

Also, your remark on schools flushing their water systems is not correct. They do not necessarily do that because of lead, but other contaminants. For most municipal water systems, if the water pressure flowing through the pipes was not high enough, contaminants would actually flow in, rather than be pushed out. Sometimes you just cannot avoid this. Every engineering project has limitations, which we need to work around. Tap water is quite safe, and I dare you to prove otherwise with facts, and studies rather than your own word.

The only reason I continue to answer your crazy pill inspired posts is to make sure I am a dissenting voice to your rants.


Posted by Intangible on May-29-2008 04:58:

Re: The ban-wagon rolls on... plastic bags, phones, electronics yet to be invented!

Im going to be honest... I didnt go through this whole thread. I will tomorrow when Im less tired. But I had to put my thoughts here... I disagree with everything Jayx1 has said

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1


-Cigarette displays in stores banned....i saw cig billboards when i was a kid and i dont smoke! Also, this is exactly how the liquor stores used to operate until the 60s and people still bought a lot of booze didnt they?



But a lot of kids do smoke! This isnt going to affect smokers, its only going to help decrease the number of new smokers and help quiters. Yes it hurts some retailers, but seriously its for the better.

quote:


-Smoking in cars with kids (my parents did this and i grew up fine!)



STFU! Seriously! this pisses me off. Second hand smoke is horrible for everyone especially young kids. So many kids have asmtha because of their parents. A law that is protecting children you cant argue that one.

quote:

-Plastic bags at the liquor store. I guess theyd rather kill a tonne of trees with paper rather than use recyclable plastic bags. FYI paper bags get an average of 1 use while plastic bags get reused 2 to four times.



I think its great the the gov't is trying to encourage us to bring our own bags. I keep a cloth bag in my purse. I think everyone should...
And the paper bags cant really be used for carrying, youve seen them, they are only really meant to help protect bottles. I dont think they will use many more than they already do.
quote:

Strongly being considered (Which with Mcguinty means it will definately happen):

- cell phones in cars. Mcguinty said he wasnt interested in this type of ban a few months ago. Where have i heard that before? Oh yes he said the same thing about smoking in cars and police airplanes. Most Toronto drivers suck regardless of whether or not they are on a phone. In fact most of the douchbags i pass who are doing 80 in the left lane are by themselves and spaced out in their own little world.

- Electronic devices - This must be a world first. Not only are they going to ban blackberrys, MP3 players, and i wouldnt be surprised if radios and CD players are in there. But they are going to ban devices NOT EVEN INVENTED YET Only Mcguinty and his commie liberals could think of that one!!! I cant wait for the flood of douche bags that park on the side of highways to take a call which is probably 1000 times more dangerous than talking while driving.



Thank god! Too many accidents. Too many reckless driving. No phone call is that important! Keep your eyes and mind on the road. Driving is serious business.

quote:

- plastic bags in all retail stores. Again, cant wait for the mess of paper bags that tear and shred before you even make it to the car. Cant wait for the chemically treated paper bags to get thrown out instead of resued. Makes for great showboating politics but not very practical.



Read my comment above about bags. Plus maybe you should do some research about our land fills and plastic bags.... its a serious problem

quote:

- Plastic water bottles. Many school boards are already banning them (after banning pop) and now the province might do the same. I guess they want us to drink from the lead coated pipes in schools and parks. If i were in the business id have a few solutions.


Yay for Brita! I honestly dont know much about this one.. let me read up...


quote:


Good old canada. We have a lot of real problems such as lost jobs, genuinely poor people, and health care but the government is too busy micromanaging adults. Who voted for the Liberals? Wasnt me!





I voted for liberals... not a fan of a lot of their actions to be honest... but everything listed here is GREAT!


Posted by RandomGirl on May-29-2008 06:06:

The law regarding kids in the car and smoking...

This is common friggen sense!!!

The fact that we would even have to enforce it because some people are so friggen daft to begin with, is maddening.

It's too bad that there are some people out there that are just too dumb and selfish to see beyond their own satisfactions.

I hope this law goes through, and I absolutely hope it gets enforced. All the people in a rage about it should shove it up their arse. If you weren't such a moron to begin with, you wouldn't have something to be mad about.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on May-29-2008 12:58:

The Loblaws Superstore in Milton doesn't even offer plastic bags. They say its because they are being environmentally friendly....which is absolute BS. If they were trying to be environmentally friendly and not just trying to sell their 0.99 cloth bags then they wouldn't have plastic bags all over the place to put your veggies and fruit in. If they really cared then they would just give me as many cloth bags as I need.

Although I don't agree often with Jay I think many people here are missing his main point on most of the issues he brings up. The different levels of government are treating adults (the ones that elect them) like children who cannot make decisions for themselves. I don't think babysitter is an elected position at any level of government.

I can't wait till the government starts dictating how many kilometers you can drive a day or have an automatic lights out policy after 8 pm.


Posted by jonnystel on May-29-2008 13:12:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
Although I don't agree often with Jay I think many people here are missing his main point on most of the issues he brings up. The different levels of government are treating adults (the ones that elect them) like children who cannot make decisions for themselves. I don't think babysitter is an elected position at any level of government.


NO theyre treating STUPID adults who cant make proper desicions in life that in turn affect others negatively.. by forcing them to do what best for the majority


Posted by Intangible on May-29-2008 13:17:

quote:
Originally posted by jonnystel
NO theyre treating STUPID adults who cant make proper desicions in life that in turn affect others negatively.. by forcing them to do what best for the majority



agreed


Even if these laws are 'babying' people, so what?

These laws benefit our enviroment, our lives, our children, our society.....

Sometimes even adults need a little push.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on May-29-2008 13:22:

quote:
Originally posted by jonnystel
NO theyre treating STUPID adults who cant make proper desicions in life that in turn affect others negatively.. by forcing them to do what best for the majority


every human makes wrong decisions in life....its part of being human. The government cannot stop people from making wrong choices.

Every time something bad happens there is some group of people who say BAN IT. The government, in all its wisdom , make the decision to not piss that small group off and they BAN IT.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on May-29-2008 13:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Intangible
agreed


Even if these laws are 'babying' people, so what?

These laws benefit our enviroment, our lives, our children, our society.....

Sometimes even adults need a little push.


Would you be so quick to agree if the government decided it wasn't safe for people to be outside after 8:00 p.m. so they banned people from being outside their residence after 8:00 p.m.?

The government needs to worry about running the country and not running the lives of every individual.


Posted by Intangible on May-29-2008 13:30:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
Would you be so quick to agree if the government decided it wasn't safe for people to be outside after 8:00 p.m. so they banned people from being outside their residence after 8:00 p.m.?

The government needs to worry about running the country and not running the lives of every individual.


if it really wasn't safe... maybe due to bombing or something

I mean it has to be logical and beneficial to the majority, and all these new bans are.


And uhhhhh

These laws are about running the PROVINCE

the environment is very important and our economy and standard of living depend on it
And the individual people make up the province. The children our the future for this province. And peoples idiot actions (texting while driving) are killing innocent people, clearly not everyone is smart enough to make their own decisions.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on May-29-2008 13:46:

I guess they should ban having food or drink in the vehicle as well. Heck....maybe it would be easier just to ban driving altogether. That way we save the environment and nobody will die in a car accident.

Wether its the provincial government or the federal government both are trying to micromanage the lives of its citizens....and that is not the job of the government....the government is here to run the province or country.


Posted by Intangible on May-29-2008 14:13:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
I guess they should ban having food or drink in the vehicle as well. Heck....maybe it would be easier just to ban driving altogether. That way we save the environment and nobody will die in a car accident.

Wether its the provincial government or the federal government both are trying to micromanage the lives of its citizens....and that is not the job of the government....the government is here to run the province or country.



I really dont think the issue is about 'banning' but its about forcing drivers to drive responsibly.

Really how would you feel if one day someone you love is hit and killed by a driver who was talking on the phone, eating, putting on make up. Reckless driving needs to end. And banning the use of electronics while driving is going to save lives. So really stop bitching because its going to cause you some slight inconvenience, and you will have to wait till you are parked to call back your friend. Every time you miss a call think about a life this ban is potentially saving.

Is banning guns without a license a bad thing? How about making certain drugs illegal? Enforcing a drinking age? All these bans 'micromanage' individuals but benefit our society.


Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.