TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- For an Angel is very over rated
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by UWM on Jun-23-2008 19:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Guest
god this thread sucks.


Instead of choosing to criticize ignorant people I choose now to pity them and leave them about their ways.

It takes so much less effort and makes life much more pleasant.

Posted by Ian on Jun-23-2008 19:53:

Avenue beats anything else he's done in that era & since. More proof trance goes better with Acid.

Posted by Trance-M on Jun-23-2008 19:54:

Re: For an Angel is very over rated

quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Not exactly sure why this song was ever considered good, since it obviously is not. Is it just because Mr. Dyk produced it in his prime that it got a lot of attention? Maybe because of the experience people had while listening to this song in it's prime? Either way, none of these are valid excuses for the track itself being any good.


I never thought it was amazing, but why do you think it was on about every trance compilation back then???
I did like the piano though.

Is Emergency! also over rated?

Posted by montana on Jun-23-2008 20:01:

the ashtrax mixes are still good

Posted by WhooCares on Jun-23-2008 20:09:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Instead of choosing to criticize ignorant people I choose now to pity them and leave them about their ways.

It takes so much less effort and makes life much more pleasant.



so much that you had to post about it

Posted by DOOMBOT on Jun-23-2008 20:11:

quote:
Originally posted by DjWhooCares
so much that you had to post about it

lol!!!

Posted by UWM on Jun-23-2008 20:16:

quote:
Originally posted by DjWhooCares
so much that you had to post about it


I'm not quite sure of your typing capabilities, so I won't jump to any conclusions, but laying out two sentences really doesn't require much effort on my behalf.

Choosing to engage someone in discussion, counter and critique their points, and end up in another irrelevant internet argument (which I likely would have done in the past) would, however, entail more time and energy than I really care to spend.

Posted by Clovis on Jun-23-2008 20:17:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
I'm not quite sure of your typing capabilities, so I won't jump to any conclusions, but laying out two sentences really doesn't require much effort on my behalf.

Choosing to engage someone in discussion, counter and critique their points, and end up in another irrelevant internet argument (which I likely would have done in the past) would, however, entail more time and energy than I really care to spend.



UWM uses common sense!


But it fails!

Posted by pierre_escargot on Jun-23-2008 20:20:

It's not the quality of the track itself, but the nostalgia assosciated with it. At the time when it released, it was great to listen to, but nothing spectacular that would make me jizz.

It brings back good memories, good times in Ibiza etc, and when a few of us heard it for the first time in ages a couple of years ago, it brought them all back and was superb.

Posted by DOOMBOT on Jun-23-2008 20:26:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
I'm not quite sure of your typing capabilities, so I won't jump to any conclusions, but laying out two sentences really doesn't require much effort on my behalf.

Choosing to engage someone in discussion, counter and critique their points, and end up in another irrelevant internet argument (which I likely would have done in the past) would, however, entail more time and energy than I really care to spend.

Choosing to engage someone in discussion, counter and critique their points, and end up in another irrelevant internet argument (which I likely would have done in the past) would, however, entail more time and energy than I really care to spend.

Wait...

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-23-2008 20:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Guest
god this thread sucks.

It's still better than any of yours.

Posted by Guest on Jun-23-2008 21:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
It's still better than any of yours.


what do you know?

Posted by DOOMBOT on Jun-23-2008 21:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Guest
what do you know?

He knows at least one thing.

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Jun-23-2008 21:04:

Doombot's complete inability to recognise his own idiocy is his most admirable trait.

...Make that only admirable trait.

Posted by DOOMBOT on Jun-23-2008 21:06:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Doombot's complete inability to recognise his own idiocy is his most admirable trait.

...Make that only admirable trait.

Got anything else to say? I'm sure a lot of us would like to know some more.

Posted by Guest on Jun-23-2008 21:10:

neato.

Posted by DOOMBOT on Jun-23-2008 21:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Guest
neato.

Doesn't take much.

Posted by Clovis on Jun-23-2008 21:13:

I wish you guys were each other's alts

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-23-2008 21:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Guest
what do you know?

I know your threads are shit and you make too many of them.

Hey, I think that's two things.

Posted by DOOMBOT on Jun-23-2008 21:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
I know your threads are shit and you make too many of them.

Hey, I think that's two things.

Haha! You are correct! Keep'em coming!

Posted by jupiterone on Jun-23-2008 21:21:

great odin's raven

Posted by Morphology on Jun-23-2008 21:42:

Admins should lock, or at least supervise, threads like these on a more regular basis. I haven't seen a locked thread in a while.


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.