TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Geoengineering
Pages (2): « 1 [2]
basically:
earth is being destroyed by powerful and unpredicatble machines
solution is - build an even more powerful, wildly unpredictable machine to UNDESTROY it!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tubularbills and if we don't deal with it, then BILLIONS of people are going to die, right? that's what the IPCC and Fox News are saying. i can really only care about this whole GC thing so much. because really, unless they make it illegal, i'm still going to drive my nissan frontier and get 18 miles to the gallon. fuck it. that, and i'm a severe weather nerd. weather is my thing. and i don't see how we can use modern day weather anomolies to predict long-term climatology. /just my beef |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT I'm going to refrain from engaging in any more of this discussion with you because there is no possible way it can go any further without me losing any respect I've still got for you. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Clovis +5 But this is where we are on the issue in America. One day maybe people will see that it's about "environment" and not whether or not the sea level will rise in 25 years. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tubularbills i'm still going to drive my nissan frontier and get 18 miles to the gallon. fuck it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DOOMBOT Hopefully before it is too late. I mean, it can't be any more obvious but look at some of the posts in this thread. People simply don't care. |
I am more interested in geoengineering in order to produce climate change rather than to prevent it (although arguably we are already doing that in at least one respect, heh.) I don't know why environmentalism always seems to imply preventing environmental change, but personally I don't think that simply trying to preserve the environmental status quo is what's best for the environment, or for us.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Arbiter I am more interested in geoengineering in order to produce climate change rather than to prevent it (although arguably we are already doing that in at least one respect, heh.) I don't know why environmentalism always seems to imply preventing environmental change, but personally I don't think that simply trying to preserve the environmental status quo is what's best for the environment, or for us. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Clovis I think we'll just be able to keep arguing about what "too late" is, as the quality of our environment on earth continues to be degraded and destroyed by our recklessness, without ever having the chance to have real discussions on what we're doing to the earth without it turning into a "climate change" argument. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT I'm going to refrain from engaging in any more of this discussion with you because there is no possible way it can go any further without me losing any respect I've still got for you. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Sadface However, many of the other solutions seem extremely objectionable, particularly sulfor dioxide, or any other "global shading" type of solution. |

| quote: |
| The year is estimated to be around 2199, and humanity is fighting a war against intelligent machines created in the early 21st century. The sky is covered in thick black clouds created by the humans in an attempt to cut off the machines' supply of solar power. The machines responded by using human beings as their energy source, growing countless people in pods and harvesting their bioelectrical energy and body heat. The world which Neo has inhabited since birth is the Matrix, an illusory simulated reality construct of the world of 1999, developed by the machines to keep the human population docile. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.