TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Investments
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
| quote: |
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN sorry, thats too funny. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN no way! every little bit helps |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by jonSun It was sometime in may i think. I think it might have been $155 or $156. I sold 2 days later after it dropped about $8 a share. I had 110 shares too. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lilith Early on you have to be fairly aggressive in your purchasing, if you can find something for the right price, get it and then move onto something which is going to bring in a higher overall yield then you may as well cut and run onto the better option. By all means use its net worth to get the better property, but its one of those things (unlike shares where you have to make a spot decision sometimes) you do get a bit of time to think about it. I maintain a couple of high appreciating, high demand rental properties simply for that reason, when I want to buy something which is a smaller investment I use them as collateral. Find something I think will make money, buy it and rent it out, if/when it appreciates I'll sell it for a profit and move onto something else. But that's basically 'what I do' when it comes to a job and it also requires a volatile housing market to do a lot with. If you're in a sedentary market and have to work as well you're basically restricted to what it will hold up with and how much time you can invest into looking. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog Blergh. I studied this briefly at university (not that that means much), and it's a load of rubbish. Why would you intentionally make a loss on a property to avoid tax when you could make a profit, pay the tax, and still make some on top of your capital gain, rather than hoping for good capital gain whilst making nothing? |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN youre looking at it the wrong way. of course you want to make a profit on your investment. good luck finding a property you can rent for more than your mortgage cost. my latest purchase = $1700/month in INTEREST only repayments. and thats on a fairly low-priced house. for me, negative gearing is a nice 30% rebate i get every tax year that helps me afford the investment in the first place. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog Exactly. You're getting a tax rebate...yet losing money at the same time. There are plenty of ways to make money on properties that don't involve conventional renting. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN gotcha, that makes a lot of sense. me, im in it for the ultra-long haul. ie selling up around retirement age so i dont have to worry so much about my super contributions. thats what you get when youre a poorly paid lazy public servant |
move to england maybe? my sister's currently got 5 houses she rents out, rental income more than covers the interest only mortgage and outgoings, so just sit back and wait for appreciation.
or invest in blair athol and start a series of hydro farms
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lilith Well you don't always have to be that but you appreciate the security of government jobs has a predictable paycheck... I went the other way around as a 'dirty yuppie' and worked myself stupid for about 10 years until I'm at the point now I have problems with fatigue, burnt out and have to stop (zee doctors orders!) But I'm bouncing back and just taking things a bit slower. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN such as? im intrigued |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN if you need any lessons in how to take things REAL slow, send me a PM! |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog there are still lots of properties that make money on rent almost immediately. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN not in this country champ! |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Investments
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog 4th post down. http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...841#post9061841 |
Regarding negative gearing, another (most obvious!) thing I didn't think of:
Why buy a property with a 3% rental return and 10% interest repayments when you could simply put the money in the bank at 7 or 8%?
You'll be missing out on capital growth, but your interest will be compounding in a risk and management free environment, leaving you to pursue other things, and if you ever need the money it's available instantly.
Simply put: I wouldn't buy an investment property if it was going to give me a negative return.
It's funny; people treat property differently to a business or shares. Would you ever buy a business (a cafe or bar for example) that you knew was going to be losing money weekly, in the hope that your tax would be reduced and that you may be able to sell the business for more later on?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog Regarding negative gearing, another (most obvious!) thing I didn't think of: Why buy a property with a 3% rental return and 10% interest repayments when you could simply put the money in the bank at 7 or 8%? You'll be missing out on capital growth, but your interest will be compounding in a risk and management free environment, leaving you to pursue other things, and if you ever need the money it's available instantly. Simply put: I wouldn't buy an investment property if it was going to give me a negative return. It's funny; people treat property differently to a business or shares. Would you ever buy a business (a cafe or bar for example) that you knew was going to be losing money weekly, in the hope that your tax would be reduced and that you may be able to sell the business for more later on? |
pkc, if you start with $10,000, contribute a modest $1200 per month at 7% compound interest, in 10 years you will have $229,000 less tax.
This opposed to a property which costs you far more than $1200 per month in interest repayments, and might double in value if you are lucky.
I agree with you that property is the way to go, but not if it's losing money.
What savings account gives you 7%? That can't be a saving account..
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Krypton What savings account gives you 7%? That can't be a saving account.. |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Beat Blog pkc, if you start with $10,000, contribute a modest $1200 per month at 7% compound interest, in 10 years you will have $229,000 less tax. This opposed to a property which costs you far more than $1200 per month in interest repayments, and might double in value if you are lucky. I agree with you that property is the way to go, but not if it's losing money. |
) and with only a contribution of $35/week, have it worth $58,000 in 2008.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog This opposed to a property which costs you far more than $1200 per month in interest repayments, and might double in value if you are lucky. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN haha, good luck sticking to that plan! The reason I like property is because its forced savings. with things like life getting in the way, i dont know a single person who saves $1200 a month into their savings account. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN and lets not forget that your 7% rate can turn into 2% very quickly. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN here's my case study and how my experience has worked. i paid $162,000 for a unit, borrowing about $155,000 in 2006. my payments are $513/fortnight and my rental return is $420. after tax rebates and various other "costs" i can claim against this property, it costs me roughly $35/week to own (not including things like insurance etc). got an appraisal from the bank and its now worth roughly $200,000 and i only owe $149,000. now, find me a bank account that i could've started with $7,000 (though where do i get that money if not from the home owner's grant ) and with only a contribution of $35/week, have it worth $58,000 in 2008. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog huh? Even average Joe in Australia can get 8%. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Krypton That is insane. I simply don't believe it. At Bank of America, the interest rate on the basic savings account if .20% (http://www.bankofamerica.com/deposi...te=save_regular) Getting an 8% would involve either buying junk bonds, ultra-high yield dividend stocks, etc. No money market, no treasury bond, no certificate of deposit goes higher than 5%. That's why it's so hard for me to believe a basic savings account in Australia can get 8%. How do the banks make money?? They must charge very high interest rates on loans if they want a profit. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog I do, but I don't have a wife and kids to support, which makes it hard for some people. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog I'm pretty sure you can get fixed interest accounts like loans? The converse is also true though, if an interest account can go down to 2%, a loan can go to 15% if you're not on a fixed rate, like it was in the 80's. |
so i know i can afford that investment for at least 5 years.| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog That's admirable, but it's only one example. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beat Blog We've totally fucking hijacked this thread anyway. I think we can both agree on the fact that echo should just plonk his money into an interest account at 7 or 8% and in 2 years he will be laughing. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.