TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Comcast is going to limit broadband usage
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by BTG on Aug-29-2008 22:07:

i get 25 GB / month :/

canada sucks.


Posted by OrZonE on Aug-29-2008 22:10:

Rogers in Canada caps at 50G/75G (depending on the service you get) both ways. As I see it US is still miles ahead in that department.


Posted by Sushipunk on Aug-29-2008 22:11:

quote:
Originally posted by BTG
i get 25 GB / month :/

canada sucks.


Yeah, that's what I get here too.


Posted by Gauss on Aug-29-2008 22:40:

Standard package in Croatia is 10 GB a month I think, but I have to admit that package sizes and connection speeds are advancing quickly.
It used to be 5 GB not too long ago and 1-2 GB not too long before that.

But what do I care, I've been on flat rate since the very beginning of 2004.

My connection speed has progressed like this since the middle of 2003:

64kbit -> 128kbit -> 192kbit -> 256kbit -> 384kbit -> 512kbit -> 768kbit -> 1Mbit -> 2Mbit -> 3Mbit


Posted by Fledz on Aug-30-2008 01:12:

I get by on 25gb a month. I'm sure people can handle 250 fucking gigs


Posted by tubularbills on Aug-30-2008 01:33:

i really have no idea how much i use. i'm sure its less than 250; but i dunno...suddenlink doesn't have any limits...


Posted by Jake Benson on Aug-30-2008 01:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian
Welcome to most UK ISPs!


Do not want to be like UK.


Posted by wesleysnipez on Aug-30-2008 01:48:

Hell I average about 12GB a day here with 4 people using the same pc here.


Posted by XaNaX on Aug-30-2008 01:59:

I've come close to that quite a bit downloading bluray movies


Posted by diesel_tron3000 on Aug-30-2008 02:27:

fuck the FCC for allowing comcast to do this but technically they can do whatever they want. hopefully the FCC won't let them do this like they did with limiting bandwidth


Posted by Fledz on Aug-30-2008 02:31:

If you're illegally downloading HD and Blu-Ray movies, how the fuck do you get off saying that what your ISP is doing is illegal? You guys are the biggest hypocrites around and your cases would be thrown out of court straight away and you into jail. Be happy that you can download what you do and have 250 gigs a month. That is MORE than enough you bunch of fucking whingers.


Posted by T-Soma on Aug-30-2008 03:07:

12 gig per month from 12pm - 12am
then an additional 24 gig from 12am to 12pm.

And that is probably costing more than most uncapped plans in the US.
I remember when we first got cable internet here (6 years ago) it was unlimited and wayyy cheaper.

Australia's communications infrastructure is so screwed


Posted by getfoul on Aug-30-2008 05:06:

Hate to burst any hate bubbles, but it's the same cap they've been enforcing in the past. Only difference is now they are publicly saying what the number is. There's no difference in the service what so ever. Just a press release mentioning what they're up to.


Posted by CyclonesWorld on Aug-30-2008 05:21:

Everyone is making a big deal about this. Comcast has always had a 250gb limit but they've never been public about it. If you went over it they would call you and bitch about it.

I torrent music and movie 24/7 and I've never gone over 250gb. Unless you're streaming 1080p porn all day for a week most people have nothing to worry about.

At 10 Mbps it'd take over 2 days to download 250gb. I doubt anyone is constantly pulling that kind of speed for 2 days with Comcast.

/edit ^^^ Damn I was beat to it.


Posted by pyro264jb on Aug-31-2008 05:34:

tom your screwed


Posted by winston on Sep-01-2008 02:02:

seems ok, fuck Internet junkies lol


Posted by idoru on Sep-01-2008 02:03:

quote:
Originally posted by getfoul
Hate to burst any hate bubbles, but it's the same cap they've been enforcing in the past. Only difference is now they are publicly saying what the number is. There's no difference in the service what so ever. Just a press release mentioning what they're up to.


Exactly. The one complaint about the cap in the past was that Comcast would never tell anybody what it was. Now that it's out, people are bitching just as much when nothing has changed at all.


Posted by Sunsnail on Sep-01-2008 02:50:

rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble


Posted by La5eR on Sep-01-2008 03:25:

From a software developer standpoint this can be bad: Lets say youre running MS Visual Source Safe and you have two or more offices around the world and you use comcast as the source-safe server host.

You run a nightly build of your product and ship it out to your other offices via FTP or SFTP.

If your product is around 500MB after a succesfull build your group of x employees all need a copy to test the next day and do regression testing on it. If you have upwards of 50 developers working on this project thats roughly 25GB/day of transfers out of the month if youre on the standard M-F work week thats cap after 2.4 weeks of transfers. You then also run into even more trouble if your OS software vendor makes a service pack or security update to the OS your developers are running on. Then theres the E-Mail traffic and other various business related traffic. It all adds up fast.


Posted by idoru on Sep-01-2008 03:28:

quote:
Originally posted by La5eR
From a software developer standpoint this can be bad: Lets say youre running MS Visual Source Safe and you have two or more offices around the world and you use comcast as the source-safe server host.

You run a nightly build of your product and ship it out to your other offices via FTP or SFTP.

If your product is around 500MB after a succesfull build your group of x employees all need a copy to test the next day and do regression testing on it. If you have upwards of 50 developers working on this project thats roughly 25GB/day of transfers out of the month if youre on the standard M-F work week thats cap after 2.4 weeks of transfers. You then also run into even more trouble if makes a service pack or security update to the OS your developers are running on. Then theres the E-Mail traffic and other various business related traffic. It all adds up fast.


Yes, but...

This is the same limit that they've had in place from day one. If you've been going about your daily business (see: if people have been doing similar to what you've suggested) so far without any problems then you have nothing to worry about.


Posted by Sushipunk on Sep-01-2008 03:29:

quote:
Originally posted by La5eR
From a software developer standpoint this can be bad: Lets say youre running MS Visual Source Safe and you have two or more offices around the world and you use comcast as the source-safe server host.

You run a nightly build of your product and ship it out to your other offices via FTP or SFTP.

If your product is around 500MB after a succesfull build your group of x employees all need a copy to test the next day and do regression testing on it. If you have upwards of 50 developers working on this project thats roughly 25GB/day of transfers out of the month if youre on the standard M-F work week thats cap after 2.4 weeks of transfers. You then also run into even more trouble if your OS software vendor makes a service pack or security update to the OS your developers are running on. Then theres the E-Mail traffic and other various business related traffic. It all adds up fast.


I would guess that there are business plans available, that don't have that kind of cap?


Posted by idoru on Sep-01-2008 03:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
I would guess that there are business plans available, that don't have that kind of cap?


There are.


Posted by aquila on Sep-01-2008 08:54:

I'm quite content with 15Gb per month, I don't download many movies as such.


Posted by Sushipunk on Sep-01-2008 09:18:

quote:
Originally posted by aquila
I'm quite content with 15Gb per month, I don't download many movies as such.


Yeah, but if your internet was really fast, you might


Posted by aquila on Sep-01-2008 09:31:

Yeah true, but Telstra won't let me have a very fast internet connection (at least not at the price the rest of the world is paying!)

Fuck 'em.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.