TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Working the EQ's
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by aBigWreck on Nov-13-2008 22:17:

Such an interesting thread


Posted by Zak McKracken on Nov-13-2008 22:31:

quote:
Originally posted by aBigWreck
Such an interesting thread

lol not a sticky imo


Posted by Allied Nations on Nov-14-2008 00:40:

quote:
Originally posted by palm
lol not a sticky imo


not by itself, but it does work in the dj booth guide sticky


Posted by Excess on Nov-14-2008 00:43:

i do think this deserves a sticky. a lot of people are probably clueless about proper EQing.


Posted by Storyteller on Nov-14-2008 10:30:

How would you define proper eq-ing. In my opinion eq-ing is proper as long as it sounds good. Nothing else.


Posted by Zild on Nov-14-2008 12:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Storyteller
How would you define proper eq-ing. In my opinion eq-ing is proper as long as it sounds good. Nothing else.


That is obviously what we are discussing here. And the methods we use to achieve that good sound. Everyone is different and reading through different styles of mixing and different approaches to the music gives a very good insight.


Posted by Storyteller on Nov-14-2008 13:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Zild
That is obviously what we are discussing here. And the methods we use to achieve that good sound. Everyone is different and reading through different styles of mixing and different approaches to the music gives a very good insight.


I know. But my reply was towards this post:

quote:
i do think this deserves a sticky. a lot of people are probably clueless about proper EQing.


Given anyone has ears, and hopefully hasn't wrecked them yet, proper EQ-ing is no more than common sense (listen and apply correction where necessary) in my opinion. It's not that hard. This post just didn't make any sense to me. Especially since there is no real way to say EQ-ing is proper anytime as that's a personal opinion anyway.

That's why I wanted to know his definition of proper EQ-ing. To me it feels like he's saying there are rules to follow when it comes to EQ-ing.

Honestly I can't imagine people being clueless about EQing... It's so simple and pretty much common sense and after you touched those pot's a coupe of times, you know what they do.


Posted by Zild on Nov-14-2008 13:12:

There are some rules I have in my mind when approaching a mix. And I can definitely buy people being clueless about EQing because I have to see them in the DJ booth almost every time I want to go out somewhere.


Posted by Storyteller on Nov-14-2008 13:53:



That sucks.


Posted by elFreak on Nov-14-2008 16:32:

these rules while standard are not always applicable.

for instance,(albeit very very rare) dueling baselines can work.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Nov-14-2008 19:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Allied Nations
not by itself, but it does work in the dj booth guide sticky

then it should also include how to turn the cd player on


Posted by Excess on Nov-14-2008 20:30:

quote:
Originally posted by palm
then it should also include how to turn the cd player on


sadly, EQing isn't a common sense thing as most of you think. certain songs and are better mixed with certain settings on the EQ's...and how the hell is that similar to turning your cd players on? you only learn to mix by doing, and having others be able to tell you what's worked for them can only help your learning curve in doing so.


Posted by Allayla on Nov-14-2008 20:44:

Every track is mastered differently, and every mix is different. After awhile you get really good at hearing what needs to be tweeked through the moniters or headphones. Some tracks need to be set on the clock differently to avoid a clash with the outgoing track, or need the highs to be almost killed on the incoming to avoid clash or abrupt volume increase, then blended in. I guess what i'm saying is after a long time of practicing/recording/playing out you realize what needs to be adjusted on the eq's in order to execute that "perfect" mix you hear in your head. I say for the most part leave the mids alone, and mix only with the highs, lows, faders and filters if you have them, and practice mixing through the moniters (not headphones) and learn how to hear clashing frequencies and level control. Messing with the eq's is useless until you've learned what sounds good and what clashes.


Posted by CiTrus on Nov-18-2008 17:04:

hey people.

i had this mix up with those EQ methods that i learnt from this thread.

Pls comment.



Click Here

btw i still find matching the keys make it easier to EQ for better sound overall, as opposed to the past, where any 2 songs can be compensated with skilled EQing.


Posted by Imu on Nov-19-2008 08:36:

imo it depends on what u as a DJ want to emphasize in ur mix. if u were bringing in georgia - ode to 99 for example, ud leave the mids at about 2 o clock and lo at 12 (bass isn't too high in that track) while gradually bringing the levels up. radio crash on the other hand has a much harder kick, and u want to be bringing it in at the right time, so ud work more with the lo. It depends on the track and it's impossible to lay down any rules on this...but I think each person would do this differently depending on how they want their mixes to sound and what in particular appeals to them in the tunes they are playing.


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.