TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Cops crack down on clubs: Walk Through Finds Drugs, Bad Behavior
Pages (9): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »


Posted by Skipper on Oct-28-2008 15:35:

Guys, if you lived in the area and did not go to the zone like you do, you'd probably feel the same way.
There's absolutely no benefit to having the zone in your neighborhood unless you go there. That corner is sketch enough as it is.

I have been to the zone and I do think it is worse than other clubs in the city as far as drug use goes.


Posted by love_child on Oct-28-2008 15:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
Guys, if you lived in the area and did not go to the zone like you do, you'd probably feel the same way.


Probably not


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Oct-28-2008 15:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
Guys, if you lived in the area and did not go to the zone like you do, you'd probably feel the same way.
There's absolutely no benefit to having the zone in your neighborhood unless you go there. That corner is sketch enough as it is.

I have been to the zone and I do think it is worse than other clubs in the city as far as drug use goes.


you could say the same thing if it was a Burger King there. If I don't go to Burger King then what is the benefit of having the Burger King there.


Posted by Skipper on Oct-28-2008 15:41:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
you could say the same thing if it was a Burger King there. If I don't go to Burger King then what is the benefit of having the Burger King there.


No, you could not say the same thing, as burgers are legal, drugs are not.
And people do not leave Burger King fucked up on french fries and act erratically on the street outside.


Posted by DannyPINK on Oct-28-2008 15:42:

No matter what happens to the Comfort Zone the scene will still exist. The scene will reinvent itself around whatever venues are available.

Zone has already made it's mark in history and we'll be supporting it until the last beat has reverberated through it's basement walls.

I LOVE CZ


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-28-2008 15:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
No, you could not say the same thing, as burgers are legal, drugs are not.
And people do not leave Burger King fucked up on french fries and act erratically on the street outside.


Whoa, hold the fuckin' phone.... Your issue is not with CZ but with the clients, particularly those that use drugs. If that's the case then you should be looking for increased police presence rather then the closure of a business. You can't honestly believe that a business is wholly responsible for the actions of it's customers.


Posted by Jayx1 on Oct-28-2008 15:49:

you could make the slippery slope arguement that burger king contributes to litter because it's customers throw wrappers on the ground. And in this era of so called garbage reduction measures it's a very possible arguement. People are already trying to ban drive thrus for god sake!

As i always say. If you dont want to live in a big city, DON'T!


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Oct-28-2008 15:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
No, you could not say the same thing, as burgers are legal, drugs are not.
And people do not leave Burger King fucked up on french fries and act erratically on the street outside.


no...I don't think anyone is getting fucked up on french fries...but what stops customers from doing lines of blow off the table to help wash down their burger?

It seems you have a bigger issue with the party goers then the actual club.


Posted by Skipper on Oct-28-2008 15:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Whoa, hold the fuckin' phone.... Your issue is not with CZ but with the clients, particularly those that use drugs. If that's the case then you should be looking for increased police presence rather then the closure of a business. You can't honestly believe that a business is wholly responsible for the actions of it's customers.


If I felt the zone could or would operate without entertaining the clientele that I find take away from the neighborhood, then I wouldn't have a problem with it - but what do you think the odds of that happening are? A police presence would have the same net effect anyways - business would drop (as it did after the raids) and eventually the place would close. So if the end result the same either way, don't waste time and taxpayer money prolonging the inevitable.


Posted by Big Boss on Oct-28-2008 15:52:

At least these people have somewhere somewhat safe to go. This is just going to drive the afterhours more underground, in totally illegal warehouses, etc where there is less security. Less security means less help when it comes to an overdose, or a fight, or a fire hazard, etc.

Not good.


Posted by Jayx1 on Oct-28-2008 15:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
If I felt the zone could or would operate without entertaining the clientele that I find take away from the neighborhood, then I wouldn't have a problem with it - but what do you think the odds of that happening are? A police presence would have the same net effect anyways - business would drop (as it did after the raids) and eventually the place would close. So if the end result the same either way, don't waste time and taxpayer money prolonging the inevitable.


so let the club die a natural death instead of letting politicians decide. If the place is a problem and the cops are there and that keeps clients away so be it. And i hate to say it, but democracy and democratic practices cost money. We could just say "why waste money on courts, just throw the buggers away!" But that would be silly wouldn't it?

By the way, police presence should be responsive instead of imposing. Otherwise you create more problems


Posted by Skipper on Oct-28-2008 15:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
you could make the slippery slope arguement that burger king contributes to litter because it's customers throw wrappers on the ground. And in this era of so called garbage reduction measures it's a very possible arguement. People are already trying to ban drive thrus for god sake!

As i always say. If you dont want to live in a big city, DON'T!


You could make a lot of slippery slope arguments, but the reality is that the zone contributes more sketch to that corner than burger king does. (And I believe there is a Burger King on the opposite corner)

I have lived in the neighborhood for years and pass through that intersection multiple times per day including on weekends and that is my observation, and for that reason, I would not lose any sleep if the zone closed. Maybe when you move to the neighborhood we could take a stroll through there together and see what your thoughts are. Until then....keep on with your hypothetical arguments, and I will keep talking about what actually happens there, cool?


Posted by Skipper on Oct-28-2008 15:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
so let the club die a natural death instead of letting politicians decide. If the place is a problem and the cops are there and that keeps clients away so be it. And i hate to say it, but democracy and democratic practices cost money. We could just say "why waste money on courts, just throw the buggers away!" But that would be silly wouldn't it?


From the sounds of it, the zone doesn't have many more days left operating only because it is appealing the revokation of its license. So perhaps this is all a moot point.

All I said was that I would prefer a condo than the zone and you guys got defensive. I would also prefer not to waste taxpayer money in policing the place but I know that isn't possible because we live where we do and things like this go through due process. Because I believe in democracy, I'm can live with that. I just think the end result is the same either way.


Posted by Jayx1 on Oct-28-2008 15:58:

If something like that bothered me so much i wouldnt move to the area. If i still chose to live there then i'd accept the neighbourhood for what it is. Living in a city involves tolerence for good and bad. This being no exception.


Posted by exstasie on Oct-28-2008 16:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Whoa, hold the fuckin' phone.... Your issue is not with CZ but with the clients, particularly those that use drugs. If that's the case then you should be looking for increased police presence rather then the closure of a business. You can't honestly believe that a business is wholly responsible for the actions of it's customers.



No they are not wholly responsible, but are they taking any preventative action to try and minimize the drug usage and run a legitimate business?

I'm not sure. I haven't been there since the raids...


Are they?


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-28-2008 16:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
so let the club die a natural death instead of letting politicians decide. If the place is a problem and the cops are there and that keeps clients away so be it. And i hate to say it, but democracy and democratic practices cost money. We could just say "why waste money on courts, just throw the buggers away!" But that would be silly wouldn't it?

By the way, police presence should be responsive instead of imposing. Otherwise you create more problems


Agreed. Skipper, you may be right, the club may die if you increase the police presence; however, it may survive. Perhaps increased police presence would be sufficient to keep the worst of the worst away while still leaving a venue for patrons who are not scared off by the police presence. Perhaps the increased presence would be enough to reform the behavior you find objectionable. Whether it were to survive or go under I don't care; however, the city removing a lawful business' ability to conduct business because it does not like the business' clients is just plain wrong.


Posted by Jayx1 on Oct-28-2008 16:09:

Typical whiner/anti mentality as applied to the burger king scenario:

im a vegetarian green party supporter living at spadina and college. Burger king is an undesirable business because they kill animals and produce garbage. I think they should shut down burger king because i disagree with the anti social behaviour that goes on there. I dont believe that i should instead move to a cul de sac in the suburbs far away from cow killers because the world revolves around me and especially my beliefs.


Posted by smuncky on Oct-28-2008 16:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
condo projects are starting to be delayed.


in what sense?

i'm not seeing any slow down in permits being filed and approved for that area. in fact, all design work for condos in the entertainment district is going full steam ahead.

just the other day i saw a brand new rendering for a development above this is london. it's quite nice in fact.


Posted by jon jon on Oct-28-2008 16:12:

quote:
Originally posted by SasH21
As a journalist myself, I find that he tried to get a bit more creative and don't sound like those anal news reporters...


lol wow

quote:
Originally posted by SasH21
Also, I think this article written with a very unbiased tone.


The Toronto Sun is a piece of shit haha it's an incredibly sensationalist + bias mainstream newspaper... it's essentially a tabloid in disguise. I can't believe someone who has studied journalism is actually defending it's credibility!?!??


Posted by jon jon on Oct-28-2008 16:14:

quote:
Originally posted by DannyPINK
The most concerning part of the article is where it states that CZ is only operating under the pretense that it's appealing the decision to have its liscense revoked.


agreed.


Posted by Jayx1 on Oct-28-2008 16:23:

quote:
Originally posted by smuncky
in what sense?

i'm not seeing any slow down in permits being filed and approved for that area. in fact, all design work for condos in the entertainment district is going full steam ahead.

just the other day i saw a brand new rendering for a development above this is london. it's quite nice in fact.


interesting... i read an article a week ago that said that developers are delaying or cancelling projects that havnt been started and that are only going ahead with new starts if they have committed to it already. Perhaps these permits are the last breath since they are already sold? Or perhaps you cant believe everything you read in the paper?


Posted by Jayx1 on Oct-28-2008 16:24:

quote:
Originally posted by smuncky

just the other day i saw a brand new rendering for a development above this is london. it's quite nice in fact.


im assuming the plan doesnt include a club on the ground floor? Just asking LOL


Posted by exstasie on Oct-28-2008 16:27:

quote:
Originally posted by smuncky
in what sense?

i'm not seeing any slow down in permits being filed and approved for that area. in fact, all design work for condos in the entertainment district is going full steam ahead.

just the other day i saw a brand new rendering for a development above this is london. it's quite nice in fact.


It's all speculation right now.

There was an article posted in the Star this morning about it.

It just talks about how some of these condos might now have the financing since there has been lots of issues with the credit market as of late.

http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/525562


Posted by infinity HiGH on Oct-28-2008 16:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
apparently councillor mammaliti wants to ban music that "induces violence or degrades women" and regulate calming LED lights instead of intense strobe lights.


And of course EDM falls into that category because the Top 40 rap/hip hop scene is all about flowers and hugs.

LOL@"Calming LED lights" Yea lets all go to a fucking club and fall asleep. That's my kind of party!!!


Posted by smuncky on Oct-28-2008 16:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
im assuming the plan doesnt include a club on the ground floor? Just asking LOL


no idea. i wouldn't be too hopeful about it staying open. but TiL isn't the comfort zone so it could definitely go either way.


Pages (9): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.