TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Somalian woman stoned to death for adultery.
Pages (9): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »


Posted by love_child on Oct-29-2008 17:06:

quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
their laws are their laws. not ours.
i dont think she deserved to die because i was brought up with the laws here.


Actually, Somalia is lawless so people can do whatever the fuck they want and that is wrong.


Posted by chinamon on Oct-29-2008 17:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Yohan
laws are laws. it does not mean they are just practical point of view says what we think means very little to other cultures, but if we don't speak out against stupid stuff, how else would humanity better itself? do we give such little rat's ass about plight of others?


you're thinking like big brother now... everyone needs to live like we do or do as we tell them.


Posted by elFreak on Oct-29-2008 17:08:

when humans were less evolved and did whatever they wanted was this wrong too?

*and i'm not saying somalians are not evolved.


Posted by chinamon on Oct-29-2008 17:09:

quote:
Originally posted by love_child
Actually, Somalia is lawless so people can do whatever the fuck they want and that is wrong.


they need to fix their own problems.
if none of their people are brave or smart enough to step up and take control then they deserve to rot.


Posted by Spin Laden on Oct-29-2008 17:23:

didn't developed nations used to do the same thing historically? North American laws, customs, values (some) are simply more advanced, more evolved.. other countries are simply behind, imo. It's unfortunate but Somalia, China, Middle East, they will change its laws someday (probably not in my lifetime, smirk)


Posted by zoogla on Oct-29-2008 17:27:

quote:
Originally posted by FunkyCrew
stoned her for killing someone - eye for an eye so to speak

lol according to your logic, eye for an eye in an adultery case should be more sex...i like ur logic!


Posted by Prometheus Xex on Oct-29-2008 17:35:

quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
i dunno man.. different cultures look at life differently. who are we to judge them? is it because we are taught to think we are better than everyone else?

im pretty sure she knew what would happen to her if she was caught committing adultery but she still chose to do so. if we had the death penalty in canada and you chose to kill someone and you get caught, it is nobody's fault but your own...


I'm saying that if this act is as heinous in their country as it seems to be then why is the guy not being hunted down and "dealt with" in the same manner? Unless I'm not up with the times, it still takes two for this sort of thing?


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-29-2008 17:35:

quote:
Originally posted by love_child
Yeah but killing someone is a totally different crime. Adultery is still wrong but then who were they to judge her? I guarantee you that each one of the individuals who participated in her death were not perfect human beings so what position were they in to make that call? Do you really think she deserved to die for that? I dont think so.


Jesus said that much better... strange how a religion that holds a prophet in such high regard can simply disregard the totality of his ministry.


Posted by Yohan on Oct-29-2008 17:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Jesus said that much better... strange how a religion that holds a prophet in such high regard can simply disregard the totality of his ministry.

My understanding is that Jesus was just a minor prophet, a miracle worker but his words don't mean anything compared to the Quran and the hadith?


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-29-2008 17:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Spin Laden
didn't developed nations used to do the same thing historically?


I can't think of any where adultery was punishable by being bludgeoned to death by big fuckin' rocks.


Posted by Yohan on Oct-29-2008 17:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
I can't think of any where adultery was punishable by being bludgeoned to death by big fuckin' rocks.

Ancient Assyrian/Babylonian laws? Pretty sure the Bible said something bad about adulterers in Deuteronomy


Posted by elFreak on Oct-29-2008 17:42:

yeah they just turned everything into salt.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-29-2008 17:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Yohan
My understanding is that Jesus was just a minor prophet, a miracle worker but his words don't mean anything compared to the Quran and the hadith?


Major prophet, he figures quite highly. The hierarchy goes Mohammad > Jesus > Moses. How could Jesus be only a minor figure when he was the only human taken to heaven alive and remains there waiting to lead the final war against evil (following which he will be entombed beside Mohammad)... sounds pretty important. Moreover; the Qu'ran considers the Gospels and the books of Moses to be the word of Allah. In fact, the Qu'ran states that it's validity can be tested by it's consistency with these earlier books. Which is why I find it strange that if it is supposed to be so consistent with the gospels it can be so far off on this one (especially given that Jesus' "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" zinger was delivered under pretty much the exact same circumstance).


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-29-2008 17:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Yohan
Ancient Assyrian/Babylonian laws? Pretty sure the Bible said something bad about adulterers in Deuteronomy


He stated that he was pretty sure that developed nations did the same thing at some point in their history... I would not consider Ancient Assyria or Judea to be "developed nations."


Posted by Yohan on Oct-29-2008 17:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
He stated that he was pretty sure that developed nations did the same thing at some point in their history... I would not consider Ancient Assyria or Judea to be "developed nations."

oops. i misread the that part

does anyone have good book recommendation concerning development of shariah law? looking at our muslim friends here...


Posted by chinamon on Oct-29-2008 17:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Prometheus Xex
I'm saying that if this act is as heinous in their country as it seems to be then why is the guy not being hunted down and "dealt with" in the same manner? Unless I'm not up with the times, it still takes two for this sort of thing?


it does take two to tango but you seem to forget that some cultures view men being superior to women.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-29-2008 17:56:

quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
it does take two to tango but you seem to forget that some cultures view men being superior to women.


In truth, Islam would mandate that the male involved suffer the same punishment as the female; however, it seems the clerics are less eager to dispense this "justice" upon men.


Posted by Spin Laden on Oct-29-2008 18:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
He stated that he was pretty sure that developed nations did the same thing at some point in their history... I would not consider Ancient Assyria or Judea to be "developed nations."


no, developed nations do not do these things. We are talking about these nations before they became "developed." At one point, they too were underdeveloped and had similarly punitive measures to what you are seeing in underdeveloped or non-western countries today.

Will these countries ever "evolve?" Well, we ARE reading about this on the internet today, no? No doubt in my mind mass media technology (among other aspects) has played an enormous role in putting pressure on these countries to change respective laws.


Posted by Yohan on Oct-29-2008 18:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
In truth, Islam would mandate that the male involved suffer the same punishment as the female; however, it seems the clerics are less eager to dispense this "justice" upon men.

this is not a religious thing, but cultural thing

islam, if read just from Quran, is quite liberal text. but cultural and retarded fundamentalist perceptions gives islam a bad name


Posted by Ozmozis on Oct-29-2008 18:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Yohan
this is not a religious thing, but cultural thing

islam, if read just from Quran, is quite liberal text. but cultural and retarded fundamentalist perceptions gives islam a bad name


End of thread right there...

"Not a religious thing, but cultural thing"


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-29-2008 18:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Spin Laden
no, developed nations do not do these things. We are talking about these nations before they became "developed." At one point, they too were underdeveloped and had similarly punitive measures to what you are seeing in underdeveloped or non-western countries today.


You're going to have to substantiate this claim because I'm pretty sure it's a bullshit moral relativism claim that is not actually supported by fact. If you are to equate the present social-economic level of development in much of the Islamic world to the history of the developed nations then you'd have to place it at the equivalent of Europe's feudal period. Please advise me; in exactly which Medieval European countries was adultery punishable by stoning?


Posted by Moral Hazard on Oct-29-2008 18:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Yohan
this is not a religious thing, but cultural thing

islam, if read just from Quran, is quite liberal text. but cultural and retarded fundamentalist perceptions gives islam a bad name


Indeed... that was the thrust of my post... the religion is being misused and maligned.


Posted by UmmiE on Oct-29-2008 18:09:

Alot of you are missing the key point here based on whats said in the article the lady herself wanted this punishment:-

quote:
Originally posted by Prometheus Xex

Islamists said the woman, named as Asha Ibrahim Dhuhulow, wanted punishment under Sharia law.

Local leader Sheikh Hayakallah said: "She was asked several times to review her confession but she stressed that she wanted Sharia law and the deserved punishment to apply."


Posted by Ozmozis on Oct-29-2008 18:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Please advise me; in exactly which Medieval European countries was adultery punishable by stoning?


There were actually several. It wasn't stonning to death but it was public beheading i.e.guillotine.

Infact, there were tons of accusations made during the Medival Period. Also, it didn't matter if you were Rich or Poor. Maria Antoinette is a prime example.


Posted by chinamon on Oct-29-2008 18:10:

quote:
Originally posted by �Zm�zis
End of thread right there...

"Not a religious thing, but cultural thing"


isnt that what ive been saying the whole time?


Pages (9): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.