TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »


Posted by The17sss on Oct-31-2008 05:47:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
in 17sss's defence, i never got the impression he was trying to pass other people's work off as his own. having said that thought a sourced link is always appropriate.


noted. I also assumed that people would know to a degree, since some of my posts are long. Sometimes I'll post a direct newspaper story without the source, unless someone asks for it, and they never do. Anyway if Factcheck-Jones Lebzniatnikov needs to know the source, I'll give it to him


Posted by The17sss on Oct-31-2008 05:48:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by Alex
He's a politician, you're just an idiot.



HAHAHAHA OH SNAP! HILARIOUS!!


Posted by The17sss on Oct-31-2008 05:50:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
-sigh-

Have you heard of paraphrasing? The problem with Rush and the rest is its not original thought. They are pushing an agenda. At any rate, you should be perfectly capable of sculpting out the same arguments using legitimate sources and referencing those sources. If you are not, then there is something wrong with your argument.


We're all pushing an agenda to some degree in this forum. I can sculpt out the same arguments, but my point was that it's articulated better (IMO) when he does it, so I'll post that. I'll just preface with the source again from now on, even though that will blunt the discussion of that topic.


Posted by The17sss on Oct-31-2008 05:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Zild
Someone is gagging on Rush's tiny cock.


dude... it only looks tiny because his belly is so big. In reality it's decent sized

cock-2cock 4 lyfe



Posted by Zild on Oct-31-2008 05:59:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
noted. I also assumed that people would know to a degree, since some of my posts are long. Sometimes I'll post a direct newspaper story without the source, unless someone asks for it, and they never do. Anyway if Factcheck-Jones Lebzniatnikov needs to know the source, I'll give it to him


Why don't you just put the source to begin with?

Better yet try thinking for yourself and posting original ideas that are genuinely your own.


Posted by The17sss on Oct-31-2008 06:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Zild
Why don't you just put the source to begin with?

Better yet try thinking for yourself and posting original ideas that are genuinely your own.


I already said why... because in the past when I did, the visceral hatred that people in this forum have for Rush pre-emptively stopped the discussions from happening when they saw his name sourced; so I tried it without putting his name there and I found people were actually paying attention to the content of the words more.


Posted by Zild on Oct-31-2008 06:08:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
I already said why... because in the past when I did, the visceral hatred that people in this forum have for Rush pre-emptively stopped the discussions from happening when they saw his name sourced; so I tried it without putting his name there and I found people were actually paying attention to the content of the words more.


That doesn't explain why you have to parrot back what that asshat says verbatim. It also leads people to discredit anything you say from now on.


Posted by The17sss on Oct-31-2008 06:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Zild
That doesn't explain why you have to parrot back what that asshat says verbatim. It also leads people to discredit anything you say from now on.


yeah, actually it does explain why. What's not to understand? Here it is again: I want to have a discussion about a topic. The particular topic happens to be about something I am in total agreeance with Rush about. He communicates the message better than I do, which I think will make it easier for you guys to understand where I'm coming from. In the past, citing Rush has lead to an instant bias that stops the discussion from happening before it starts. So, I tried using the same words, of which I already agree with, without citing his name and I found that people were more likely to actually read the content and have the discussion instead of saying "Rush is the source? Fuck this." Unfortunately, you're right... people will discredit what I say because of this, even if I believe they should understand where I'm coming from. So, I will cite again and we'll see if it works out or reverts back to past examples. I'll admit, it happens to me too when I see someone source the Huffpo or Kos... right away I have no interest in reading it and I'd be more likely to listen without that inherant bias by seeing those sources


Posted by Krypton on Oct-31-2008 07:22:

Rush Limbaugh is Bush's Joseph Goebbels.


Posted by Capitalizt on Oct-31-2008 08:24:

lol, what a joke..Pure desperation here by the Mccain fanboys.

17ss, be honest...If your father left you when you were TWO YEARS OLD and never saw you again, would you make it a priority in life to track down his adult family and provide for them?


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Oct-31-2008 11:39:

Re: Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
So what does that make your boy at the bottom of the Democratic ticket? lol


Funny that you recognize what he did is wrong. Problem is, he used one paragraph, cited it ten times, and on the eleventh occasion, he didn't. So while that's bad, your habitual stealing is worse.


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Oct-31-2008 12:58:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
dude... it only looks tiny because his belly is so big. In reality it's decent sized

cock-2cock 4 lyfe




I can appreciate the fact that you're, umm, *poking* fun at yourself.

But oh God did I really not need to see that picture.......


Posted by Trancer-X on Oct-31-2008 13:30:

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I can appreciate the fact that you're, umm, *poking* fun at yourself.

But oh God did I really not need to see that picture.......


I was going to mention something but I didn't want to dignify that post with a response.


Posted by Scottaculous on Oct-31-2008 16:14:

Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
You know what's really pathetic? You, you fucking plagiarizer. Are you even capable of an independent thought?









http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/da...5107.guest.html

For anyone who ever put the slightest bit of trust in anything this creep said, read it and judge for yourselves. This is textbook plagiarism, the lowest of all intellectual crimes you can commit. When Josh pointed it out in that other thread, I thought it was a one-time thing, but this is now THREE times he's quoted verbatim from a right-wing website and passed the words off as his own.

The17sss, you are absolute scum.


I don't know you Lebezniatnikov, but I think I love you.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Oct-31-2008 16:24:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
Pffft! Please. Call me Joe Biden?

Look, he simply articulates much better than I do exactly how I think and feel about most political related policies. When I've prefaced direct quotes in the past from him, just seeing his name is instant cause for you guys to dismiss the content of the words right away. When I leave his name out, I find that you guys listen a little bit more. If you ask me, "are those your words?" I'll gladly say no, they are Rush's. But I'm interested in discussing these topics with you people, and if leaving his name out is going to take away the up-front bias, so be it.


That's such bullshit - it's interesting here that people are attacking the source, when in reality Rush did nothing wrong. He just had his own original ideas and thoughts completely ripped off by some guy on a discussion forum substituting Rush's words for his own lack of original thought or, as he puts it, "articulation."

If they aren't your words, it's dishonest to pass them off as your own. Period.

It's ridiculous to assume that we all want to engage in the intellectual masturbation of debating against Rush Limbaugh and whoever else's work you've pilfered and passed out as your own.

If you're not invested enough in a topic to devote a second of your time to expressing whatever opinion you might have, it's absurd to expect that we should do you the courtesy of responding to the substance of anything you post.

edit: Furthermore, you've completely discredited yourself to the point where I don't know whether you've ever "articulated" your own honest opinion, much less whether or not you have the balls to stand behind whatever opinions you espouse with your own words.


Posted by Krypton on Oct-31-2008 16:27:

Goddamnit the17sss, I'm in a packed university library...


Posted by guerra-monstru on Oct-31-2008 16:43:

I can think of nothing more horrible than John Mccain leaving his model wife after she became paraplegic and lost all her looks. The same wife that stood by him during Vietnam and the events afterword. And him settleing down with a women nearly half his age and another model. And she was rich too.


Posted by The17sss on Nov-01-2008 05:45:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
That's such bullshit - it's interesting here that people are attacking the source, when in reality Rush did nothing wrong. He just had his own original ideas and thoughts completely ripped off by some guy on a discussion forum substituting Rush's words for his own lack of original thought or, as he puts it, "articulation."

If they aren't your words, it's dishonest to pass them off as your own. Period.

It's ridiculous to assume that we all want to engage in the intellectual masturbation of debating against Rush Limbaugh and whoever else's work you've pilfered and passed out as your own.

If you're not invested enough in a topic to devote a second of your time to expressing whatever opinion you might have, it's absurd to expect that we should do you the courtesy of responding to the substance of anything you post.

edit: Furthermore, you've completely discredited yourself to the point where I don't know whether you've ever "articulated" your own honest opinion, much less whether or not you have the balls to stand behind whatever opinions you espouse with your own words.


The topics come fast and furious... when a hot one comes up that I hear about, I don't have time to write a fucking term paper to your liking. So in the case if the issue this thread began with, which I was interested in making into a discussion, I put together the best laid out set-up for it (from my perspective) using Rush's words. But you are assuming I was passing the words off as my own... I was not. If anyone asked for a source, I would have given it. Sometimes I lay out the source, sometimes I don't. When people ask for it, I never say, "I'm the source bro... those are my ideas." I already explained why I didn't source HIM in particular; because you and others with your viewpoints are less likely to actually get into the discussions if you see his name, and you pay more attention to a topic's content when it's not there. Sometimes I like to see what you have to say about an issue, so if that's the best way to do it, that's what I'll do.

When did you become the decider of what constitutes as substance and what doesnt? I won't be losing any sleep at night if my explanations don't please you or garner your approval. Fortunately for me, I don't view you as some kind of standard bearer for anything other than being a fat angry jerkoff (yes, I've seen a photo of you, Humpty-Dizz). If you spent as much time eating salads as you do acting like you're a political/research savant, maybe your self esteem would be a little higher and you wouldn't act so hateful all the time. But what do I know?

I can already predict your response: you have to stoop to the level of making fun rather than facing the facts that I called you out on... shows your maturity... can't distract from the issue... blah blah blah. Hit me back as hard you you can, lyrical genious... I promise I won't need a tissue


Posted by The17sss on Nov-01-2008 05:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
Goddamnit the17sss, I'm in a packed university library...


my bad... that photo was a little over the top. lol


Posted by The17sss on Nov-01-2008 05:46:

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I can appreciate the fact that you're, umm, *poking* fun at yourself.

But oh God did I really not need to see that picture.......


yeah... my bad. that image can get burned into the retna


Posted by Krypton on Nov-01-2008 06:01:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
my bad... that photo was a little over the top. lol


lol, there were at least several hundred students around me...


Posted by DJ Shibby on Nov-01-2008 10:03:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
yeah... my bad. that image can get burned into the retna


Having any semblence of rationale, you will join the modus operundi.

And eventually, we will be free.

All things,

ALL THINGS,

come in stages.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Nov-01-2008 12:21:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
The topics come fast and furious... when a hot one comes up that I hear about, I don't have time to write a fucking term paper to your liking. So in the case if the issue this thread began with, which I was interested in making into a discussion, I put together the best laid out set-up for it (from my perspective) using Rush's words. But you are assuming I was passing the words off as my own... I was not. If anyone asked for a source, I would have given it. Sometimes I lay out the source, sometimes I don't. When people ask for it, I never say, "I'm the source bro... those are my ideas." I already explained why I didn't source HIM in particular; because you and others with your viewpoints are less likely to actually get into the discussions if you see his name, and you pay more attention to a topic's content when it's not there. Sometimes I like to see what you have to say about an issue, so if that's the best way to do it, that's what I'll do.


Don't act like you quoted the material and forgot a link - your original post is still there for everyone to see. Are you going to pretend you don't know what plagiarism is?

quote:
When did you become the decider of what constitutes as substance and what doesnt? I won't be losing any sleep at night if my explanations don't please you or garner your approval. Fortunately for me, I don't view you as some kind of standard bearer for anything other than being a fat angry jerkoff (yes, I've seen a photo of you, Humpty-Dizz). If you spent as much time eating salads as you do acting like you're a political/research savant, maybe your self esteem would be a little higher and you wouldn't act so hateful all the time. But what do I know?

I can already predict your response: you have to stoop to the level of making fun rather than facing the facts that I called you out on... shows your maturity... can't distract from the issue... blah blah blah. Hit me back as hard you you can, lyrical genious... I promise I won't need a tissue


Nice, way to work in the personal attacks. I bet your mother is proud.

Don't worry about my self-esteem though. This "Humpty-Dizz" was a two-sport athlete in college. I understand though - it does probably bother you that you got called out for academic dishonesty by a football player.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-01-2008 12:35:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Don't worry about my self-esteem though. This "Humpty-Dizz" was a two-sport athlete in college. I understand though - it does probably bother you that you got called out for academic dishonesty by a football player.


Lebezniatnikov, if you're really brett favre then i love you even more


Posted by Groundhog Boy on Nov-01-2008 14:45:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Obama's Aunt found living in Boston slum

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Don't act like you quoted the material and forgot a link - your original post is still there for everyone to see. Are you going to pretend you don't know what plagiarism is?

But didn't you read, he's so much more busy than all the rest of us that he doesn't have time to come up with his own ideas. Your professors in college would have accepted that defense, right?

Secondly, The17sss, why do you think that we care more about Rush's stupid statements than any that you've come up with. They're both on pretty equal terms when it comes to sheer idiocy (though like Lebez stated, we're now not sure when you have actually made your own statements as opposed to copy & pasting).


Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.