TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Why didn't I have to show my ID when voting?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by jerZ07002 on Nov-04-2008 21:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
I'm more or less neutral on the issue - the number of people affected is admittedly very small.

However, the dissenting opinion (Breyer) in the recent Supreme Court case was intriguing:

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-21.pdf


oh yeah - i don't even bother reading dissenting opinions when i do my research (then again it's not often i need to read supreme court opinions). they are more or less irrelevant considering the dissenting opinion is on the losing side of the law. admittedly, some dissenting opinions become relevant, and the dissent usually gives good insight into a differnt view of the law, however, they should rarely be used to support your argument (even though many times they are used to support an argument).


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Nov-04-2008 21:40:

quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
that's not true. fundamental rights may be infringed upon if it meets strict scrutiny. Essentially, satisfying strict scrutiny means: Governments can prohibit a fundamental right if it has a compelling interest, the law is narrowly tailored to achieve the goal of the law, and it is the least restrictive means to achieve that goal. As an example, free speech is prohibited in many instances (in schools, on certain public property, etc...).


Ah, yes, that is true - but in the case of the Marion County case, they weren't able to prove such state interest. The state claimed voter fraud, but was unable to point to a single confirmed case of fraud that took place at the polls. The only fraud confirmed was absentee - which is notably unaffected by the Voter ID laws.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Nov-04-2008 21:41:

quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
oh yeah - i don't even bother reading dissenting opinions when i do my research (then again it's not often i need to read supreme court opinions). they are more or less irrelevant considering the dissenting opinion is on the losing side of the law. admittedly, some dissenting opinions become relevant, and the dissent usually gives good insight into a differnt view of the law, however, they should rarely be used to support your argument (even though many times they are used to support an argument).


Which is only why I'm using it to show that there is a compelling argument - not that there is legal precedent.


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on Nov-04-2008 21:47:

Re: Why didn't I have to show my ID when voting?

quote:
Originally posted by HardTranceProd
Can someone explain why nobody asked me for my driver's license or other ID when giving me the ballot today? I was able to cast my ballot without any kind of ID check, in my area (Baltimore MD).

In fact, I went to the official Maryland board of elections site (http://www.elections.state.md.us/), I entered my personal info, and I saw this:

Do you need to show identification when you vote? NO

How is this possible? Why aren't they afraid of voter fraud!? Somebody could have mentioned my name before me and no questions would have been asked.


Haha, if this were to happen here I can guarantee you there would be hundreds of buses coming from Bosnia and Serbia filled with mercenary voters. Hell they try to do that and sneak along every election even though you do have to show your ID card here. They sometimes try to avoid that by using dead people's ID's and stuff like that...


Posted by Magnetonium on Nov-04-2008 21:55:



Yeah, in Canada there's ID's, voting cards, etc. etc. No electronic voting machines. Cant go wrong.


Posted by jerZ07002 on Nov-04-2008 22:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Which is only why I'm using it to show that there is a compelling argument - not that there is legal precedent.



i wasn't suggesting you were citing it as law. I was just cautioning you that it's not always a good idea to cite dissents, especially considering the argument which convinced them wasn't so compelling as to convince at least 4 other justices.


Posted by Ridexer on Nov-05-2008 11:01:

Lol US presidental election = Way for media to make shitloads of cash.

IMO democracy fails, when people vote for things they have no idea about.


Posted by Clovis on Nov-05-2008 17:57:

The first time I voted, In Nevada in 04', my ID was checked, every time I've voted in CA I've not had it checked. Yesterday they did ask me to verify my current address (just tell them what it was so it matches their records).


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Nov-05-2008 18:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Yeah, in Canada there's ID's, voting cards, etc. etc. No electronic voting machines. Cant go wrong.


nobody seems to care about how we do our elections. Even though we probably do them as efficiently as any country could.

marked paper ballots hand counted = flawless


Posted by OurManFlint on Nov-06-2008 01:11:

They didn't ask for my ID, but it seems unlikely that anyone could vote in place of a random person. They would have to know the specific voting location where they are registered to, and the precinct, at least where I voted. If I managed to steal someone's voter registration card, then that would be another matter, since all of that info is on the card.


Posted by DrUg_Tit0 on Nov-06-2008 08:37:

quote:
Originally posted by OurManFlint
They didn't ask for my ID, but it seems unlikely that anyone could vote in place of a random person. They would have to know the specific voting location where they are registered to, and the precinct, at least where I voted. If I managed to steal someone's voter registration card, then that would be another matter, since all of that info is on the card.


If you do that individually, you can probably vote instead of your neighbour since there's a large chance he'll be in the same voting location as you would.

On the other hand, if you have a party organization behind you, it's pretty likely they'll be able to get at least some info on a large number of registered voters. Obviously the situation is ok for now, but there most certainly is a whole lot of space for abuse.


Posted by trancebrat on Nov-08-2008 08:54:

When I went to vote they asked for my voter's registration card and scanned it into a computer. I don't know what all came up on their screen, but they asked me to verify my name, address and something else. They then asked to see a form of identification. I gave them my driver's license. They compared the information and asked me to sign on a machine (like a credit card machine). They compared the signature to my driver's license. Once everything matched they returned my voter's registration card, ID and gave me a printout to take to an official in order to receive a ballot. They told me that my card would not be able to be scanned a second time. After I voted I was told to send my ballot through a machine and the computer would tell me if my votes were received. I overheard one official tell someone that they couldn't touch their ballot. I guess the person was having trouble understanding how to put their ballot into the reader. My precinct organized a thorough and smooth polling process. My county was red.


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.