TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Review: Focal Twin 6 Studio Monitors
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
knowing focal jmlab hifi from before im surpriced they doesnt cost more.
Just bought me a lightly used pair @ $2,200. Should get here in about a week.... going to pair them with an Apogee Mini-DAC. Upgrading from HR824s as well.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo Just bought me a lightly used pair @ $2,200. Should get here in about a week.... going to pair them with an Apogee Mini-DAC. Upgrading from HR824s as well. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo Just bought me a lightly used pair @ $2,200. Should get here in about a week.... going to pair them with an Apogee Mini-DAC. Upgrading from HR824s as well. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by palm didnt u just recently get the mackies? ur upgrading pretty fast man |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by palm didnt u just recently get the mackies? ur upgrading pretty fast man |
I got the HR824s a year ago and did about 3 tracks on them. Overall, I can understand why people like them. The imaging is pretty damn good and they sound very "musical" and "commercial". Like a good pair of audiophile speakers. But I simply had a hard time picking out detail in the mids with them. Transfers to other systems went well. But I sold them today for $200 less than I paid (including all selling / shipping fees).
After seeing the deal for the Focals ($1,000 off retail) I figured, why the hell not just skip a step and get monitors of this quality earlier than I was planning. I highly doubt I'll ever get anything that is higher quality and HOPE I never feel the need to get a different pair of monitors of equal or lower quality as a 2nd reference.
Within my reasonable financial and physical space limitations, I'm never going to get a pair of monitors that are higher quality. And that's a good feeling and I'm very confident it will lead to some very good music.
3 of us right in a row getting rid of the HR824s. Makes me a feel a lot better actually because I felt maybe something was wrong with me because they are hyped up so much.
It seems like the focals, although in a different price bracket, are becoming the new industry standard.....
Alanzo - I thought I saw another forum that you had already bought a miniDAC and were really not happy with the lack of improvement over your existing interface and sent it straight back? 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ RANN Alanzo - I thought I saw another forum that you had already bought a miniDAC and were really not happy with the lack of improvement over your existing interface and sent it straight back? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo Right. On AudioPioneers and Anjunabeats. I did return the Mini-DAC, but I'm getting another one. Three reasons: 1. On $3,200 monitors, it's definitely a good idea to use a high-quality DAC. 2. I would have to put an unbalanced signal into the Focals from my Audiophile. 3. There definitely is a difference, I heard it even on the HR824s. I'm sure it's even more audible on the Twin6s. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo Like a good pair of audiophile speakers. But I simply had a hard time picking out detail in the mids with them. |
Damn it! Now I want new monitors. Fucking gear acquisition syndrome.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild Damn it! Now I want new monitors. Fucking gear acquisition syndrome. |
haha i was starting to become a gearjunkie bought alot of shit, but suddenly i got enough and sold everything again, starting all over. but i gotta watch out not getting bitten again. what id like sometime next year is a better soundcard and monitors but i dont know what to get and maybe some sort of apple mac.
I just want something better than entry level monitors/soundcard, one drum machine, one mono synth, and I have the rest. I say that now, but once I have that I know I'll 'need' something else. I'm just tired of mixing and producing in the box. I'm used to playing instruments live not programming them, so I find software very uninspiring. And with so many options (vst, softsynths, samplers) I have a hard time committing to a certain sound because I keep tweaking trying to make it better or moving from one instrument to the next. I work better if I'm limited to just a few instruments.
There's an interesting theory in group management which basically states that after you have a certain amount of people working on a single problem, the more you add, the longer it will take them to solve the problem.
The same goes with studio gear, I feel. Once you hit a certain point, you're spending more time working with and lusting over gear than you are on the music. This is why I refuse to get any new gear without first selling something I already have. In this case, I sold the HR824s to make way for the Twin6s.
In addition, I refuse to get any hardware FX/processors as it would add way too much complication... and because VSTs sound great these days.
Yes the old saying about too many cooks. I think it applies here.
^ Agreed with both you guys.
I have dozens of soft synths and loads of samples, and I'm always tweaking them so I find it hard to "commit" to something I've made. I get bored with one synth or effect, so I start playing with another instead of working on the sounds I've already made on the first.
I bet that if I had just one hardware synth, a sampler, and a few effects units I would have made many more tracks than I have.
I don't necessarily think its a bad thing to have lots of gear, I think where a lot of people fail is buying more stuff before getting to know the stuff they already have. I know I have been guilty of that in the past.
At that point it them becomes a vicious circle, because you already have gear that you KNOW you need to spend time learning, and then you go and compound the problem by buying MORE gear that you need to learn. At some point, you have to start making some music with all of it otherwise what is the point?
However, I still subscribe to the theory that it doesn't really matter what you have. Talent is talent, and the best producers do a whole lot with very little. At the end of the day, it's still all about the song and not about the gear.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles ^ Agreed with both you guys. I have dozens of soft synths and loads of samples, and I'm always tweaking them so I find it hard to "commit" to something I've made. I get bored with one synth or effect, so I start playing with another instead of working on the sounds I've already made on the first. I bet that if I had just one hardware synth, a sampler, and a few effects units I would have made many more tracks than I have. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pwnage1 Hm... I feel like it would enhance productivity but hinder creativity. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles Maybe for some people, but I find that I get most creative when I concentrate on working with just one synth. It forces me to push the equipment to its limits instead of just switching synths when I get bored or frustrated. |
Coming from a background of playing drums and guitar. If you can't be creative on a trap set as a drummer or on an acoustic guitar as a guitarist then you just suck. It doesn't have anything to do with being limited to one instrument with a limited range of sounds. I would much rather work hands on with one analog synth than a whole slew of soft synths as I find it more inspiring and therefore I can be more creative. But then again I like to play my instruments not program them.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles ^ Agreed with both you guys. I have dozens of soft synths and loads of samples, and I'm always tweaking them so I find it hard to "commit" to something I've made. I get bored with one synth or effect, so I start playing with another instead of working on the sounds I've already made on the first. I bet that if I had just one hardware synth, a sampler, and a few effects units I would have made many more tracks than I have. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.