TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Holocaust Denial
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »

just imagine how many hot jewish girls were killed in the holocaust...thats the real crime.

quote:

Originally posted by ChemEnhanced just imagine how many hot jewish girls were killed in the holocaust...thats the real crime.

well, nazi camp guards banged them first before sending them for a shower

I'm so going to hell for that comment

quote:

Originally posted by Saka +1

whore and dentist.

quote:

Originally posted by ChemEnhanced just imagine how many hot jewish girls were killed in the holocaust...thats the real crime.

They left paperbag alive.... :-/

Three words: Flat Earth Society!

quote:

Originally posted by ChemEnhanced just imagine how many hot jewish girls were killed in the holocaust...thats the real crime.

+1... I feel the same about Hiroshima and Nagasaki as well. Some of my hottest friends had relatives in Hiroshima

The halocaust is a Jewish plot to garner worldwide sympathy for their Zionist imperialism.

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton The halocaust is a Jewish plot to garner worldwide sympathy for their Zionist imperialism.

I hope this is a joke.

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel I hope this is a joke.

+1

my great grandpa was a german jew in germany during it. luckily he made it to america where he married my french-catholic great grandmother and converted. i totally would have been a jew.

quote:

Originally posted by Slylee my great grandpa was a german jew in germany during it. luckily he made it to america where he married my french-catholic great grandmother and converted. i totally would have been a jew.

I never knew that, that actually explains a lot.

quote:

Originally posted by Slylee my great grandpa was a german jew in germany during it. luckily he made it to america where he married my french-catholic great grandmother and converted. i totally would have been a jew.

My great grandparents fled Tsarist Russia. So this was before the Nazi times, but still similar outcome.

(For all you that are confused with "tsarist", it is because you are used to seeing it spelled as "csar". Czar is technically incorrect. )

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel (For all you that are confused with "tsarist", it is because you are used to seeing it spelled as "csar". Czar is technically incorrect. )

It's not that it isn't correct... it just prioritises etymology over original pronunciation (which is not an uncommon thing to do in Western Europe), because of the different ways the word Caesar evolved in the many European languages:

quote:

1555, from Rus. tsar, from Old Slavic tsesari, from Gothic kaisar, from Gk. kaisar, from L. Caesar. First adopted by Russian emperor Ivan IV, 1547.

[Source]

So, all they did was keep the original "K" sound present in "Kaiser" (which was probably present in the original pronunciation of "Caesar"), and make it sound bit like the Russian word

quote:

Originally posted by Lira It's not that it isn't correct... it just prioritises etymology over original pronunciation (which is not an uncommon thing to do in Western Europe), because of the different ways the word Caesar evolved in the many European languages: [Source] So, all they did was keep the original "K" sound present in "Kaiser" (which was probably present in the original pronunciation of "Caesar"), and make it sound bit like the Russian word

Well then my kind fellow. I was unaware of this.

You look like a monkey.

yeah and cut your fucking hair

holographic pokemon cards are some good shit

quote:

Originally posted by Lira It's not that it isn't correct... it just prioritises etymology over original pronunciation (which is not an uncommon thing to do in Western Europe), because of the different ways the word Caesar evolved in the many European languages: [Source] So, all they did was keep the original "K" sound present in "Kaiser" (which was probably present in the original pronunciation of "Caesar"), and make it sound bit like the Russian word

What? There's no "K" in that Slavic pronunciation. It's still a "C" sound, even if it begins with TS.

Re: Re: Holocaust Denial

quote:

Originally posted by ******** While I am not a holocaust denier, I am not a holocaust supporter. ... Anyone who doesn't have primary source evidence eg. experiencing or seeing something themself has the right not to beleive.

So if someone killed your grandma, I could deny it ever happened because I didn't live to see it?

Culture is developed so that humans can learn from historically primary sources through secondary sources. If you want to doubt insurmountable amounts of documents showing certain events did exist, then you have the right not to believe it, but likewise people with half a brain have the right to think that you're a fucking idiot.

quote:

Originally posted by nchs09 They left paperbag alive.... :-/

thank the torah for that!

I think the holocaust was bad.

vote for me in 2012

Re: Re: Re: Holocaust Denial

quote:

Originally posted by Jake Benson Culture is developed so that humans can learn from historically primary sources through secondary sources.

No, that would be why history was developed. Culture predates recorded documentation.

quote:

If you want to doubt insurmountable amounts of documents showing certain events did exist, then you have the right not to believe it, but likewise people with half a brain have the right to think that you're a fucking idiot.

Likewise, if I write down thousands of seemingly outlandish ideas that all correlate with one another, have I created the truth?

Re: Re: Re: Re: Holocaust Denial

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On No, that would be why history was developed. Culture predates recorded documentation.

No I am still right.

Culture was used before documentations so that humans could learn vicariously instead of learning the hard way (in person). That's why language was developed, so mom could tell her son, "don't go into that forest because a lion will eat you." (as opposed to the son not knowing his mother has encountered lots of angry lions in the forest and he goes into the forest and gets his arm bit off). The same is true for documenting history, as you said. But that doesn't mean it's incorrect for culture.

quote:

Likewise, if I write down thousands of seemingly outlandish ideas that all correlate with one another, have I created the truth?

Sorry but the Bible doesn't count as literal historical documentation.

So are you saying thousands of people testifying to witnessing or being in the holocaust was just a bunch of outlandish ideas that all correlate with one another? I suppose slavery was a hoax too. Why do black people believe in that fairy tale?

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Holocaust Denial

quote:

Originally posted by Jake Benson No I am still right. Culture was used before documentations so that humans could learn vicariously instead of learning the hard way (in person). That's why language was developed, so mom could tell her son, "don't go into that forest because a lion will eat you." (as opposed to the son not knowing his mother has encountered lots of angry lions in the forest and he goes into the forest and gets his arm bit off). The same is true for documenting history, as you said. But that doesn't mean it's incorrect for culture.

That's all well and good, but when it comes to the veracity of historical evidence, the anthropological transmission of culture is exceedingly irrelevant as the crux of the very topic at hand has everything to do with documentation and nothing to do with anecdote.

quote:

Sorry but the Bible doesn't count as literal historical documentation.

Nice try.

quote:

So are you saying thousands of people testifying to witnessing or being in the holocaust was just a bunch of outlandish ideas that all correlate with one another? I suppose slavery was a hoax too. Why do black people believe in that fairy tale?

Thousands of people? What people? Old people tend to tell stories and make shit up, it's just a part of getting old.

Tell you what, if you can find some actual historical documentation of events indicating there was some sort of mass murder of people of Jewish descent in the 1930s and 40s by a political party clearly aimed by economic idealism that is verifiable by recurrent evidence remiss of cultural interference, I might just believe you.

Until then, it's just geezers weaving yarns about how big a fish they almost caught.

I mean, really, why would this Hitler guy go through so much trouble? Where's the motive?

the holocaust had its benefits.....major medical break throughs were made by experimenting on Jews.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.