TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- NEW - Any scientists/mathmaticians? Quick question
Pages (2): « 1 [2]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by KiNeTiC ENeRgY Good deal. It's tough to get anywhere in science w/o a phd anymore, and the money is usually garbage to boot. |
x^-1 = 1/x
ml^-1 = 1/ml
It's another way of writing something (for example) as 5,000/ml (as in 5,000 units per ml). Instead you'd write 5,000 ml^-1.
Re: Any scientists/mathmaticians? Quick question
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jackson Would it be nanolitres? centilitres? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by NeoPhono x^-1 = 1/x ml^-1 = 1/ml It's another way of writing something (for example) as 5,000/ml (as in 5,000 units per ml). Instead you'd write 5,000 ml^-1. |
Here's an example of it being used (although it's still much more common to see x/ml than x ml-1).
http://www.tripdatabase.com/spider.html?itemid=630762
| quote: |
| Antiemetic effect of ondansetron 0.2 mg mL-1 in PCA morphine solution. |
| quote: |
| Plate the single-cell ES cell suspension in 50 ml fresh EB medium at a density of 105 cells ml-1 onto 15-cm bacterial dishes. |
yeah ml^-1 is units per mil just like s^-1 = hz
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Azz3D 1/ml |
Ahh Still stuck on this bullshit.
Im just gonna write down all the info i have:
Ok the basic experiment is to work out the viability of a cuture of S. cerevisiae
We have already calculated the total count as 7.5x10^7 (or 75,000,000)
Now i'm calculating the Viable count (number of living cells).
I have calculated the average number of colonies in a 10^-4 dilution and a 10^-5 dilution.
In the 10^-4 dilution there were 165 colonies in agar.
So per ml I work this out to be 1.65x10^6 (correct?)
In the 10^-5 dilution there were 10 colonies in agar.
So per ml I work this out to be 1.0x10^6 (correct??)
The average of these two figures is 1.325x10^6 (or 1,325,000)
Percentage viability of a culture = viable cells divided by total cells x 100%
So 1.325x10^6 over 7.5x10^7 x100 = 1.77%
This seems very low to me, and i think i've missed a zero out somewhere beacause 17.7% would be more believable.
Any ideas???
Thanks everyone for this, its just I need to get past this to complete the rest of the work.
Cheers

Re: NEW - Any scientists/mathmaticians? Quick question
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jackson I've got a serious mental block and cant work this out. What does ml-1 equal? I am not too bad with scientific notation since we've just come onto it. But I can't work it out...would it be nanolitres? centilitres? |
42
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.