TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- No more Z103 @ Guvernment?
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »


Posted by flavor on Feb-21-2009 01:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Shaya007
that's it I'm applying for a job, GB's all the time!!! WOOOT!


but wait.I don't do volunteer gangbangin'...soorrrry!


?

u prefer gang bangs that take place against ur will?


Posted by Shaya007 on Feb-21-2009 01:26:

quote:
Originally posted by flavor
?

u prefer gang bangs that take place against ur will?



who? what now? lol!

oh no...

I charge to be in one..I'm special!


Posted by hardcore trancer on Feb-21-2009 02:08:

This is excellent news indeed but as someone else mentioned,the damage has already been done.

z103 + Guv= LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMEEEEEE


Posted by Owen M on Feb-21-2009 02:41:

I'm kinda dissapointed.

I never goto toronto these days, so the radio on saturday nights was a little peak into the world of Guv.


Posted by dEsidEL on Feb-21-2009 04:13:


i think it helped promote the music to the mainstream


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Feb-21-2009 04:19:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL

i think it helped promote the music to the mainstream




which I continue to believe is not a good thing for the music...it only causes more garbage tracks being produced in hopes of getting that one track that will make it big.


Posted by dEsidEL on Feb-21-2009 04:33:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced


which I continue to believe is not a good thing for the music...it only causes more garbage tracks being produced in hopes of getting that one track that will make it big.



sure but i think it also helps the scene grow. it's the very reason why places like Europe have large festivals and free open air events in public venues.

i think you'll find good and bad music in all genres whether they're underground or mainstream..


Posted by activate on Feb-21-2009 06:44:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced


which I continue to believe is not a good thing for the music...it only causes more garbage tracks being produced in hopes of getting that one track that will make it big.





welcome to 1995

don't let the door hit you on the way out.


Posted by b4k-oz on Feb-21-2009 08:46:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL

sure but i think it also helps the scene grow. it's the very reason why places like Europe have large festivals and free open air events in public venues.

i think you'll find good and bad music in all genres whether they're underground or mainstream..



How oversimplified and inaccurate.
This scene was better when it was underground...with less fake people, acting as if they know the music and getting drunk.

The reason why we don't have big open air events is because laws were passed against raves and that included open air events like the ones in Europe. Too much red tape to hold such an event here. Not enough money going to the big corps for profits.

As for it helping the scene grow...it made it dwindle to nothing compared to what it was before. Politics, cut throat promoting tactics, sketchy druggies and suppliers (who haven't the slightest clue about the music or dj's spinning). Add to that, the internal politics of not letting big acts play at smaller venues. Crappy Radio stations that hire a voice to act like he really is a dj rather than just an announcer. All this ruined the scene. Oh and let's not forget the angry unpleasant ignorant old folks who hate this music and seeing kids happy or the cops wanting a big cut of the massive $$$$ pie to play security gods at big and small venues. This is why this scene lacks lustre and def doesn't need Z103.

The damage is done indeed!


Posted by me@t k@tie on Feb-21-2009 15:38:

I disagree.

People in Europe aren't any more real about the music than they are here. The only difference is that the actual music tastes differ. Just look at the fucking Brits - it's a mecca of so many different EDM genres, and don't tell me they're any less retarded than the people here. They still love getting drunk, and there's still a huge percentage of fakers, people who don't know shit, just know that this is where they can have a good time. Same thing with the ravers that were around when it was all "underground" - they all loved getting fucked up too, and a large percentage of them didn't know much more than that you take ecstasy, and then everything will be fun.

Even if there wasn't any political red tape, you wouldn't see a massive 20,000-person event happening here - there just isn't the audience for it. WEMF struggled to bring 8,000 people a year, and that's pretty much the biggest thing we had going here. Maybe in the future it would be possible, but in order for that to happen, the music needs to hit more ears. Politics or not, if only a tiny percentage of the population know that these music genres even exist, then only those people will be the ones wanting to go these events.

I'm too lazy to keep arguing this, cause it's been beaten to death, but trying to keep music underground isn't saving it. Trying to reach people who don't know about it is.


Posted by Prometheus Xex on Feb-21-2009 15:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Shaya007
who? what now? lol!

oh no...

I charge to be in one..I'm special!


Ho.


Posted by Raymond Thomas on Feb-21-2009 16:25:

Aw man. That's really shitty news.
-Lisa


Posted by italarmo on Feb-21-2009 17:59:

Thank god.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Feb-21-2009 18:19:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL

sure but i think it also helps the scene grow. it's the very reason why places like Europe have large festivals and free open air events in public venues.

i think you'll find good and bad music in all genres whether they're underground or mainstream..



growing isn't always better

We will never have large festivals here....not because of the politics involved and not because of the red tape involved but because western society is different then europe.

All I want to hear is good music and especially in north america good music is ruined when it becomes the popular choice. Early 90s hip hop was great and now anyone who can put together a few rhymes has a hit single. North American youth, in general, goes with the flow....they will like what everyone else likes and it doesn't matter how bad it is.


Posted by b4k-oz on Feb-21-2009 18:22:

quote:
Originally posted by me@t k@tie
I disagree.

People in Europe aren't any more real about the music than they are here. The only difference is that the actual music tastes differ. Just look at the fucking Brits - it's a mecca of so many different EDM genres, and don't tell me they're any less retarded than the people here. They still love getting drunk, and there's still a huge percentage of fakers, people who don't know shit, just know that this is where they can have a good time. Same thing with the ravers that were around when it was all "underground" - they all loved getting fucked up too, and a large percentage of them didn't know much more than that you take ecstasy, and then everything will be fun.

Even if there wasn't any political red tape, you wouldn't see a massive 20,000-person event happening here - there just isn't the audience for it. WEMF struggled to bring 8,000 people a year, and that's pretty much the biggest thing we had going here. Maybe in the future it would be possible, but in order for that to happen, the music needs to hit more ears. Politics or not, if only a tiny percentage of the population know that these music genres even exist, then only those people will be the ones wanting to go these events.

I'm too lazy to keep arguing this, cause it's been beaten to death, but trying to keep music underground isn't saving it. Trying to reach people who don't know about it is.


You have many valid points as do I. Though my experience has been bit different than yours. I feel that until certain laws and politics change..it's better to keep it underground.

IMO Z103 was not the best way to put our music out. This is one mistakes that cannot be repaired.
All we can do is have big hopes that one day.....we'll be able to do more in this city ...like have big events done for free...if only it could be feasible


Posted by dEsidEL on Feb-21-2009 18:34:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
The reason why we don't have big open air events is because laws were passed against raves and that included open air events like the ones in Europe. Too much red tape to hold such an event here. Not enough money going to the big corps for profits.



Those laws that were passed were bylaws enacted by the city to establish protocols for events held on city property. The same rules apply to EDM oriented events as they would with anything else, raves or otherwise. One could argue that they've added additional cost and overhead for the promoter, but considering that there were barely any standards to begin with prior, it's a start. Consider that perhaps with a greater exposure of the music to the mainstream audience, large companies and corporations might actually take an interest into providing sponsorship to hold events again much like it's done overseas.

Many genres of popular music today existed as being underground at some point or another. Us taking the whole "we are holier than thou art" attitude won't help a scene or music grow.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Feb-21-2009 18:37:

quote:
Originally posted by me@t k@tie
I'm too lazy to keep arguing this, cause it's been beaten to death, but trying to keep music underground isn't saving it. Trying to reach people who don't know about it is.


The music doesn't have to be underground to be good and the music doesn't need to be saved.....there will always be people who will love the music and dance clubs will continue to play it. Marketing it to the masses doesn't mean it saves the music...heck in the last five years the quality of especially trance and house music has gone down hill significantly in my opinion. You can already see techno starting to go down hill as well. Its incredible how many tracks some producers come out with in a single year...all in hopes of finding a hit. With music so easily available through the internet anyone with some computer knowledge can produce a track and put it on a website for the masses to download and play.

Personally, I don't think mass marketing of the music does anything to improve the quality of it....and thats more important to me then 20,000 people at a massive festival.


Posted by dEsidEL on Feb-21-2009 18:49:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
growing isn't always better

We will never have large festivals here....not because of the politics involved and not because of the red tape involved but because western society is different then europe.

All I want to hear is good music and especially in north america good music is ruined when it becomes the popular choice. Early 90s hip hop was great and now anyone who can put together a few rhymes has a hit single. North American youth, in general, goes with the flow....they will like what everyone else likes and it doesn't matter how bad it is.



There have been quite a number of large festivals held in the US which have featured EDM acts and DJs. There's no question our societies are different, but that doesn't necessarily make the population here any less receptive to the music than elsewhere. I've heard just as much bad EDM as good when I'm in Europe. Likewise, there's still a lot of great independent hiphop in both Canada and the US if you know where to find it. We just think there isn't because of the type of music that dominates the airwaves. I'd suggest checking out this year's Manifesto festival in Toronto if you get a chance - http://www.themanifesto.ca/

I know it's tempting to want to keep a good thing to yourself, but if this kind of music ever wants to be given the same type of recognition and legitimacy as its peers it has to go mainstream. And by the looks of it, it's already made significant progress in North America since the 90's as a result of the internet.


Posted by b4k-oz on Feb-21-2009 19:08:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL

Those laws that were passed were bylaws ...

Many genres of popular music today existed as being underground at some point or another. Us taking the whole "we are holier than thou art" attitude won't help a scene or music grow.


Tell me...how has it grown since it's been taken to the mainstream level? It's been mainstream for a while now....were is the growth and the sponsorship right now?


Posted by chinamon on Feb-21-2009 19:18:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
Tell me...how has it grown since it's been taken to the mainstream level? It's been mainstream for a while now....were is the growth and the sponsorship right now?


coca-cola has sponsored a few events at This Is London and Guvernment. i think thats a pretty good start for big corporate sponsorship.

edit: heineken has done a few as well.


Posted by geroin on Feb-21-2009 19:21:

quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
coca-cola has sponsored a few events at This Is London and Guvernment. i think thats a pretty good start for big corporate sponsorship.

edit: heineken has done a few as well.



so did belvedere, red bull, smirnoff etc


Posted by Owen M on Feb-21-2009 19:26:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
Tell me...how has it grown since it's been taken to the mainstream level? It's been mainstream for a while now....were is the growth and the sponsorship right now?


ha! electronic music is most definately not mainstream in Canada. Yeah, it gets some play on much music and z103, but it's still far from "over the counter" culture. There isn't a single full hour of electronic music, during day time hours, on major canadian radio station (set aside college/university radio). Yeah, there's bpm tv, but that's the only place on the televizzle you can getyour dose.


as for sponsors...
bacardi b-live stage at V-Fest
Hienekin music events
Red Bull has sponsored dance music events


quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz The damage is done indeed!

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
IMO Z103 was not the best way to put our music out. This is one mistakes that cannot be repaired.


what damage could have possibly be done by playing music on the radio?


Posted by b4k-oz on Feb-21-2009 20:51:

ppl...these were sponsors that were around b4....they aren't new.


Posted by activate on Feb-22-2009 02:37:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
How oversimplified and inaccurate.
T
As for it helping the scene grow...it made it dwindle to nothing compared to what it was before. Politics, cut throat promoting tactics, sketchy druggies and suppliers (who haven't the slightest clue about the music or dj's spinning). Add to that, the internal politics of not letting big acts play at smaller venues. Crappy Radio stations that hire a voice to act like he really is a dj rather than just an announcer. All this ruined the scene. Oh and let's not forget the angry unpleasant ignorant old folks who hate this music and seeing kids happy or the cops wanting a big cut of the massive $$$$ pie to play security gods at big and small venues. This is why this scene lacks lustre and def doesn't need Z103.

The damage is done indeed!





you must be new to the scene... we had radio shows on 103.5 and 107.9 back in the mid 90's... some with live to airs. energy 108 did a live to air from a betterdays warehouse rave in 1998 for fucks sake.

back then hardly anyone knew who the DJ was. They would come to here someone just because they were being billed as from the UK or another city... waaaaaay more people are in tune to what's going on now.

and don't even get me started on all the shady promters and whatnot that used to go on. Sure people were lovey dovey at parties back then, but that's because they were on fuckin pills... pills that in many cases the promoters had people selling for them so they could make even more money. I'll leave out all shit about DJs getting ripped off by clubs and promoters to.


so ya.. to sum it up, you don't know what you're talking about.


Posted by activate on Feb-22-2009 02:42:

oh.. and raves are not illegal on city property, nor are their bylaws regarding all night dance parties.

The reason people stopped doing them is because of the costs involved. the city required a certain amount of security to be hired as well as an excessive amount of paid duty police to be on hand.

in addition, because it's city property you have to use their union guys to do the set up. who are over paid, slow and lazy. so you get dinged twice. sounds techs and city guys.

Rent at city venues was actually quite reasonable, security and sound was not.


Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.