The Pulitzer-winning investigation that dare not be uttered on TV

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- The Pulitzer-winning investigation that dare not be uttered on TV
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by culorut on Apr-25-2009 17:53:

He is just thinking rationally and does not for one minute trust what war criminals have been proven to do time and time again.

Once a crook always a crook, what makes you believe they are being 100% honest on anything else they say to you?

On wait, IGNORANCE.

Posted by Magnetonium on Apr-25-2009 23:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
You are jumping to a lot of conclusions without evidence - I think that is pkc's point, though he puts it so poetically.

Please indulge me. I am not like Opus who goes through much time linking everything he says. Let me know which part you disagree with. I might enlighten you with an article or two. But in reality, most of that stuff is just so common sense I find it hard to believe you think its all pile of horseshit.

Arent we protecting the evil regimes (i.e. Saudis), anti-constitutional and anti-democratic methods, etc. etc. etc. Come on!

As I said - the information is there, but some people have problems connecting the dots.

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-26-2009 02:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium

I still havent read the article that this thread is about, so will just keep making irrational inferences without any evidence.

Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Apr-26-2009 03:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium

Please indulge me. I am not like Opus who goes through much time linking everything he says. Let me know which part you disagree with. I might enlighten you with an article or two. But in reality, most of that stuff is just so common sense I find it hard to believe you think its all pile of horseshit.

Arent we protecting the evil regimes (i.e. Saudis), anti-constitutional and anti-democratic methods, etc. etc. etc. Come on!

As I said - the information is there, but some people have problems connecting the dots.

I didn't say I disagreed with all of your opinions - some have a lot of merit, others seem a little more tenuous, and would certainly benefit from some hard evidence.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]