TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion
-- Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

quote:

Originally posted by Sand Leaper Oh dear. I'll just take that as a "no".

Have you ever heard a Jazz Beat? Have you ever heard NY Hip Hop? Have You Ever heard British Rock? Since when does a bassline make the entire beat? So why are you asking me such a stupid question, besides not understanding the context of what I said.

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 Have you ever heard a Jazz Beat? Have you ever heard NY Hip Hop? Have You Ever British Rock? Since when does a bassline make the entire beat? So why are you asking me such a stupid question, besides not understanding the context of what I said.

Wow, you just managed to miss my point entirely, spew even more hyperbole AND put words in my mouth in just one post. Well done.

By the way, at the moment working on a track, using a Double Bass to make some twisted and funky Techno

Its coming out sick so far.

quote:

Originally posted by Sand Leaper Wow, you just managed to miss my point entirely, spew even more hyperbole AND put words in my mouth in just one post. Well done.

lol...you got nothing son.
I already know your argument, and trust me its a waste of time for you to carry it on, especially since your vague question was built on lack of understanding the context of what I said. But i'll throw in that a double bass doesn't have the same attirbutes of a Synthesizer that can pull of much longer attack, decay, sustain, and release characters towards a sound.

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 I already know your argument

Good. Then take my advice and stop spewing ridiculous and hyperbolic praise that makes you look like a Howells/Resident Advisor-fan boy.

quote:

Originally posted by Sand Leaper Good. Then take my advice and stop spewing ridiculous and hyperbolic praise that makes you look like a Howells/Resident Advisor-fan boy.

First of all, i'll praise whoever I feel deserves it. And next time, learn how to read, learn how to make sense of what you read. Afterall it is an essential skill needed if you want to contribute/communicate to a forum. I suggest hooked on phonics.

Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Guest I listed 7 genres above that Danny excels in. He is permitted to operate within any of those, just not drum n bass. I know a lot about Danny I'm a superfan. And as a superfan I reserve the right to give an honest opinion about the artist I love.

"Permitted to operate" That was good

I was about to comment on how much I dislike this track, but I just really dislike that Juno sample. Where did they even get that? It sounds completely different than the track on Danny's MySpace

This is obviously more of his take on baleric/disco than it is on drum n' bass. Very well done I'd say, kudos to Danny. I wonder if he used a live drummer or if that's a straight drum machine.

I think placed in one of Danny's sets it would sound great.

This isn't bad at all. Not necessarily memorable, but not bad either. And as many others have said, definitely not dubstep in the least.

Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 Why make a thread about a release you're not interested in or don't like? Fucking Hell Mark.

I don't see how appreciating a track is, or ought to be, an essential condition for producing a thread about it, given the proper reasons.

In this particular case, this person obviously feels this release is notable due to it being an atypical release for Howell's, in addition to not liking it; it's bringing something discussion worthy to the surface whilst supplementing it with his own sentiments. This sounds like perfectly understandable reasoning to me.

I understand your apparent frustrations with baseless and superfluous bashing, but not everything that goes on here is aligned with that purpose, and I don't think this qualifies given that there is more context to the thread than a mere "I don't like this, and I want everyone to know."

Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Paradox Lost I don't see how appreciating a track is, or ought to be, an essential condition for producing a thread about it, given the proper reasons. In this particular case, this person obviously feels this release is notable due to it being an atypical release for Howell's, in addition to not liking it; it's bringing something discussion worthy to the surface whilst supplementing it with his own sentiments. This sounds like perfectly understandable reasoning to me. I understand your apparent frustrations with baseless and superfluous bashing, but not everything that goes on here is aligned with that purpose, and I don't think this qualifies given that there is more context to the thread than a mere "I don't like this, and I want everyone to know."

Thanks for input.

Lets say you are part of a collective, group, club night that meets every friday, you don't go to the meeting that week with a record or CD in your hand that you don't like or that you think is shit. You go with the records that you want to show off to your friends so they can enjoy the good shit you are enjoying at the moment. I mean there is so much good music to share with eachother, so how do you find time to share something you personally are'nt interested in, nevertheless questioning an artists direction.

I just think that premptive "trolling" of music and releases is something that EDM culture can do without, from a cultural, ethical, and an economic standpoint. Especially when it comes to eclectic talent like Danny Howells and his newly formed label. If you are going to put energy towards music you don't like, find artists and labels who consistently don't put out good music.

OP is also basically saying that an artist should follow a genre path as his main gripe. And what about a newly building label? Why should a label only release 4/4 music? Maybe Danny wants to build a diverse offering of music, which the OP doesn't acknowledge. Maybe I am being romantic or idealistic of what I'm asking of an online forum, but what I am saying is realistic towards music appreciation culture. We put so much time and energy to finding and enjoying good music, why not work towards a healthy and realistic music appreciation culture that grows and is enriched through sharing good music? I hope you understand where i'm coming from.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 Thanks for input. Lets say you are part of a collective, group, club night that meets every friday, you don't go to the meeting that week with a record or CD in your hand that you don't like or that you think is shit. You go with the records that you want to show off to your friends so they can enjoy the good shit you are enjoying at the moment. I mean there is so much good music to share with eachother, so how do you find time to share something you personally are'nt interested in, nevertheless questioning an artists direction.

Agreed, though the contextual elements involved here are somewhat different. I really would prefer to not get too involved in this (though it may be too late at this point), but the point of actually bringing material is undoubtedly geared towards sharing good music with like-minded individuals; so in that regard, of course you're not going to bring along content you find unpleasant. However, using that same example, I would very much be inclined to mention a release of notable status (for one reason or another) that I found myself not liking for the purposes of generating discussion due to the significant nature of the release. So while my ultimate intent in being present with that group is not to discuss music I don't like, there's nothing wrong with mentioning it due to underlying purpose of that group sustaining that type of discussion.

And that 'sustained discussion'- that dynamic of people getting together, sitting around and talking about electronic music- is, in a very real capacity, reflected here. I highly doubt anyone is here to involve themselves in discussions regarding what they don't like, but they certainly come up from time to time, and wind up creating interesting discussions in their own right.

Now, I should mention that I'm speaking in terms much more general relative to your point of contention with the OP being unfond of Howell's deviating from the typical framework of his production work (assuming he has one); that leads us into somewhat of a different direction, but I've noticed you taken back by the idea of creating threads about music you don't like elsewhere on this forum, and I wanted to jot down some of my own responses to that behavior.

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 I just think that premptive "trolling" of music and releases is something that EDM culture can do without, from a cultural, ethical, and an economic standpoint. Especially when it comes to eclectic talent like Danny Howells and his newly formed label. If you are going to put energy towards music you don't like, find artists and labels who consistently don't put out good music.

Completely agreed.

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 but what I am saying is realistic towards music appreciation culture. We put so much time and energy to finding and enjoying good music, why not work towards a healthy and realistic music appreciation culture that grows and is enriched through sharing good music? I hope you understand where i'm coming from.

And very much in agreement with you here, as well.

However, I don't feel that negative remarks that are part and parcel of simply stirring up discussion are inherently incompatible with fostering these ends.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Paradox Lost Agreed, though the contextual elements involved here are somewhat different. I really would prefer to not get too involved in this (though it may be too late at this point), but the point of actually bringing material is undoubtedly geared towards sharing good music with like-minded individuals; so in that regard, of course you're not going to bring along content you find unpleasant. However, using that same example, I would very much be inclined to mention a release of notable status (for one reason or another) that I found myself not liking for the purposes of generating discussion due to the significant nature of the release. So while my ultimate intent in being present with that group is not to discuss music I don't like, there's nothing wrong with mentioning it due to underlying purpose of that group sustaining that type of discussion. And that 'sustained discussion'- that dynamic of people getting together, sitting around and talking about electronic music- is, in a very real capacity, reflected here. I highly doubt anyone is here to involve themselves in discussions regarding what they don't like, but they certainly come up from time to time, and wind up creating interesting discussions in their own right. Completely agreed. And very much in agreement with you here, as well. However, I don't feel that negative remarks that are part and parcel of simply stirring up discussion from time to time are inherently incompatible with fostering these ends.

I think you have an interesting take on why this type of thread exists online. On those grounds and reasoning I think the existence of a negatively critical thread about a piece of music can have a place in a healthy music appreciation culture. So I agree with your reasoning there. But I don't know if this particular thread or other threads follow that idea of discussing a piece of music that is already very successful, to create a new critical dialogue or new examination of the music. So while your view is reasonable, I don't think that reasoning was employed here by the OP, or many other threads that discuss new music in a premptively negative manner. This track hasn't even seen any sort of success yet, and is still newly released.

That said, I acknowledge that on internet my ideas on this topic are romantic or idealistic, even though they strongly stem from what is real to me.

And to be clear, my ideals are not about talking up hyping up every piece of music that comes out and saying "I said damn, this is amazing", no not at all. Ideally, it is about finding music that is amazing, and then sharing that piece of music with everyone else you communicate with about music. And we did that, all we would be hearing is amazing music and evolving postively. While letting the weak music to sink to the bottom where it belongs, naturally.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 Ideally, it is about finding music that is amazing, and then sharing that piece of music with everyone else you communicate with about music. And we did that, all we would be hearing is amazing music and evolving postively. While letting the weak music to sink to the bottom where it belongs, naturally.

In spirit, I'm very much with you on just about everything you say.

Honestly, however, I think we would ultimately be doing ourselves a disservice by simply refusing to acknowledge poor quality music, and let it sink to the bottom, as you mentioned. For example, let's say an established artist puts together an artist album consisting of material that deviates significantly from his existing style (not trying to draw parallel's with Howell's most recent release, I'm just using this to give some background). Suppose you feel that album ends in complete disaster; I think it's worthwhile to remark upon this in a negative regard, as it enables us to adopt a broader contextual understanding of artist and perhaps even the musical/cultural landscape in which their music exists (for those who agree with your assessments, at least, and those who don't can certainly make for some interesting, prosperous conversation).

We could always just let slip through the cracks and await more competent material to be churned out on their end, but if nothing else, discussing why we don't like something can often serve to provide some retrospective meaning. 'Oh, remember ______, and his album ______? It was some pretty ambitious, but rather awful experimental branching out, though it was at a time in which producing _______ was the hot thing to do. His new album is much better, imo."

As for this thread being oriented towards generating healthy discussion regarding Howell's and his discography, yeah, perhaps it's got nothing to do with that; however, it really doesn't seem terribly off the mark to me.

"Hey, check out the latest from Howell's. I think it's terrible, and he should stick to what he knows best."

Yeah, it's a little more abrasive then that, and I know you disagree completely with saying Howell's should stick to a certain range of sound/style (and with the assumption that he ever did in the first place), but it seems that all the fundamental elements of legitimate discussion are there (though not quite in that order ).

Holy walls of text Batman.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Paradox Lost In spirit, I'm very much with you on just about everything you say. Honestly, however, I think we would ultimately be doing ourselves a disservice by simply refusing to acknowledge poor quality music, and let it sink to the bottom, as you mentioned. For example, let's say an established artist puts together an artist album consisting of material that deviates significantly from his existing style (not trying to draw parallel's with Howell's most recent release, I'm just using this to give some background). Suppose that album ends in complete disaster; I think it's worthwhile to remark upon this in a negative regard, as it enables us to adopt a broader contextual understanding of artist and perhaps even the musical/cultural landscape in which their music exists. We could always just let slip through the cracks and await more competent material to be churned out on their end, but if nothing else, discussing why we don't like something can often serve to provide some retrospective understanding. 'Oh, remember ______, and his album ______? It was some pretty ambitious, but rather awful experimental branching out, though it was at a time in which producing _______ was the hot thing to do. His new album is much better, imo." As for this thread being oriented towards generating healthy discussion regarding Howell's and his discography, yeah, perhaps it's got nothing to do with that; however, it really doesn't seem terribly off the mark to me. "Hey, check out the latest from Howell's. I think it's terrible, and he should stick to what he knows best." Yeah, it's a little more abrasive then that, and I know you disagree completely with saying Howell's should stick to a certain range of sound/style (and with the assumption that he ever did in the first place), but it seems that all the fundamental elements of legitimate discussion are there.

I think you make a lot of good points. And there might be some benefits to be had by pointing out new music, that is awful alongside the music that is great. Maybe to help contrast the great from the awful like you said. And that does happen in the real life music appreciation. However, i'll add one more idea to my idealistic views (fully acknowledged)...due to the vastness of the internet, the speedy and abundant access of information, there should be no shortage of good music being found and shared, to the point that there really is no room or time to discuss terrible music. This lack of time to discuss poor music would be the natural and evolutionary critique of that poor music.

Also because of the focus on great music, there will be a natural survival of the fittest. For example the culture of sharing music has so much good music, that a battle for #5,390 place is Sebastien Tellier - La Ritournelle against Radiohead - Street Spirit (Fade Out), instead of the battle for #5,390 being Kate Perry - I Kissed a Girl vs Britney Spears - Womanizer. You follow me? So if we focused on sharing purely good pieces of music, we will have found a lot more great music with this focus, to the point that there are great pieces of music far down the ladder that we can safely forget about, yet they are brilliant pieces of music. With that said, at the end of the day, I can't say your argument is wrong, but I do wish what im saying was true of the culture here.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 I think you make a lot of good points. And there might be some benefits to be had by pointing out new music, that is awful alongside the music that is great.

So people really like what you and I might consider awful.

Has that not occured to you?

Case in point, the responses in this thread.

Yet again, Internet Forum: 1, Kismet7: 0

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 ...due to the vastness of the internet, the speedy and abundant access of information, there should be no shortage of good music being found and shared, to the point that there really is no room or time to discuss terrible music. This lack of time to discuss poor music would be the natural and evolutionary critique of that poor music.

Perhaps, but even in this idealized state, I'm thoroughly confident that prominent releases- both good and bad- will always manage to become integrated into musical discussions, regardless as to whether or not we're up to our necks in good music (and I'm happy to say that in my personal life, I am).

When Digweed releases Transitions 5, or when Sasha releases his next single to emFire, we're definitely going to see more than a few discussions pop up, and inevitable negative responses; which isn't necessarily a bad thing.

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 Also because of the focus on great music, there will be a natural survival of the fittest. For example the culture of sharing music has so much good music, that a battle for #5,390 place is Sebastien Tellier - La Ritournelle against Radiohead - Street Spirit (Fade Out), instead of the battle for #5,390 being Kate Perry - I Kissed a Girl vs Britney Spears - Womanizer. You follow me? So if we focused on sharing purely good pieces of music, there would be a natural process of finding which one is better and why, and we will have found a lot more great music with this focus, to the point that there are great pieces of music far down the ladder that we can safely forget about, yet they are brilliant pieces of music. With that said, at the end of the day, I can't say your argument is wrong, but I do wish what im saying was true of the culture here.

Yeah, I see what you're saying with that, but I still prefer to enjoy a strong sense of context regarding artists I've been following for years, and that often involves a discussion of lesser quality releases. More broadly, this can also tie closely into an examination of precisely what is happening in terms of trends and developments in the world of electronic music in general.

Ultimately, though, I place far more emphasis upon sharing/discussing good music than anything else, and I think most other people here do, too; so things aren't as glum as they may seem to you.


EDIT: By the way, I feel it necessary to clarify that although I've been using 'good' and 'bad' in very definitive senses, in no way do I mean to suggest that there is some consensus on these matters. I guess you could prefix my use of those words with the phrase 'that you/people find...'.

I've never seen Kismet start a thread about a release. Never. If you'd spend as much effort in finding or making good music as you do in trolling, maybe you would not appear as ridiculous with your 2000+ words posts. Just sayin'.

Internet forum: 2. Kismet7: 0.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Clovis So people really like what you and I might consider awful. Has that not occured to you? Case in point, the responses in this thread. Yet again, Internet Forum: 1, Kismet7: 0

Exactly. For instance, you can't dictate to an ATB fan (and there are some here) that his music is horrible (though you can try )...it will simply be written off and you'll be asked to move on to the next thread. Suffice to say, expecting utopia to take root on the Internet is not too dissimilar from expecting a utopia in the real world.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Danny Howells - Flight Home [Dig Deeper]

quote:

Originally posted by Paradox Lost Perhaps, but even in this idealized state, I'm thoroughly confident that prominent releases- both good and bad- will always manage to become integrated into musical discussions, regardless as to whether or not we're up to our necks in good music (and I'm happy to say that in my personal life, I am). When Digweed releases Transitions 5, or when Sasha releases his next single to emFire, we're definitely going to see more than a few discussions pop up, and inevitable negative responses; which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Yeah, I see what you're saying with that, but I still prefer to enjoy a strong sense of context regarding artists I've been following for years, and that often involves a discussion of lesser quality releases. More broadly, this can also tie closely into an examination of precisely what is happening in terms of trends and developments in the world of electronic music in general. Ultimately, though, I place far more emphasis upon sharing/discussing good music than anything else, and I think most other people here do, too; so things aren't as glum as they may seem to you. EDIT: By the way, I feel it necessary to clarify that although I've been using 'good' and 'bad' in very definitive senses, in no way do I mean to suggest that there is some consensus on these matters. I guess you could prefix my use of those words with the phrase 'that you/people find...'.

I think we took the discussion all it could go, and I can say I am more open minded towards the negative reviews, though i'll maintain my romantic beliefs of what an ideal music appreciation culture could be. cheers

quote:

Originally posted by ponsshin I've never seen Kismet start a thread about a release. Never. If you'd spend as much effort in finding or making good music as you do in trolling, maybe you would not appear as ridiculous with your 2000+ words posts. Just sayin'. Internet forum: 2. Kismet7: 0.

You guys are keeping score?

In that case its more like Kismet7 : 8 Internet Forum : 0

Draws : 1



That said, Paradox Lost did a good job to get his views accross with great rationale and reasoning. Well much of my argument is based on ideals, although with realistic grounds.

Outcasts FTW.

Oh my god you're such a good socialist

quote:

Originally posted by Kismet7 I think we took the discussion all it could go, and I can say I am more open minded towards the negative reviews, though i'll maintain my romantic beliefs of what an ideal music appreciation culture could be. cheers

Agreed; this is probably a good place to end it.

It's been thought provoking, no doubt.

and for the pidgeonholers out there who needs to actually label what this is. the original is broken beat, matrix remix is liquid funk.

and i listened to both in full on danny's myspace and i like it alot, the bassline is fierce and pads are great. i can see myself playing the original quite easy, would go nicely with some bugz in the attic and phuturistix stuff.

matrix remix, it's good but he should have used the original break, would have sat in a nice juxtaposition with the driving nature of the track. i know a number of jocks who would support this version.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.