TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Paul Oakenfold or Girl Talk?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by stev�sto on May-14-2009 14:17:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
From here: http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=495779


so the only proof the world has is nefardec's word? i find it hard to believe he hit play and didn't do anything else computer wise the entire show. very hard to believe. isnt there an article or video or something that shows how he plays his mashups live?


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on May-14-2009 14:18:

quote:
Originally posted by stev�sto
so the only proof the world has is nefardec's word?

If you look further down in the thread, another guy (fpcookie) says that Girl Talk did the same thing in Melbourne.


Posted by bogartgreens on May-14-2009 14:46:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
If you look further down in the thread, another guy (fpcookie) says that Girl Talk did the same thing in Melbourne.


yeah, pretty sure there's an MWTA that opened for him and saw a similar thing. just pressed play and messed around with the EQ.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on May-14-2009 14:48:

In the videos I've seen of him, he's nearly always bouncing around like a monkey on meth, so I guess it stands to reason that he couldn't be doing anything very involved on the computer.


Posted by flavdave on May-14-2009 15:09:

And DJs like Oakie that beatmatch track A and track B while fiddling with the EQ knobs are soooooo much better. I mean, they're actually doing something so it must be a better show.


Posted by ziptnf on May-14-2009 15:46:

I've never actually seen Girl Talk live so I didn't know he didn't actually DJ. That sucks, I thought he was like super skilled and did live mixing, kinda lame that all those mashups are pre-recorded.


Posted by stev�sto on May-14-2009 16:33:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
In the videos I've seen of him, he's nearly always bouncing around like a monkey on meth, so I guess it stands to reason that he couldn't be doing anything very involved on the computer.


i dont mind an ableton set as long as it sounds good. i do remember a vid that showed him scrolling through a list of names and dragging them to another area on the screen while the music was playing.

i think its good that djs put constant scrutiny on "live acts" and keep them under close watch to make sure the integrity is there, because it is important. but, i dont like it when something is considered a fact just because a couple of opening DJs said so. i want proof, not hearsay.

anyway, if really all he does is hit play on a 1 hour long mp3, then that wireless thing he does with his portable desk strapped to his waist and neck playing outside in the street/alley outside the venue is really really sad and fraudulent.


Posted by elFreak on May-14-2009 16:36:

he uses cool edit, not ableton.


Posted by flavdave on May-14-2009 16:52:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
he uses cool edit, not ableton.


He uses AudioMulch, not Cool Edit. That's probably why these opening DJs thought he was playing a pre-recorded file, because the screen didn't look like Ableton or Serato. He must be a fake!


Posted by elFreak on May-14-2009 17:01:

we get it, you have a hard on for girl talk, relax and dut dut dut dut.


Posted by ziptnf on May-14-2009 17:14:

quote:
Originally posted by flavdave
He uses AudioMulch, not Cool Edit. That's probably why these opening DJs thought he was playing a pre-recorded file, because the screen didn't look like Ableton or Serato. He must be a fake!

As long as it's not Windows Media Player or something equally as silly, it's okay. Pre-recorded shit would suck, hopefully he at least does something live besides dance around like a jackass.


Posted by elFreak on May-14-2009 17:31:

the best way is to go see for yourself.

you don't seem to be presented with many options here, and i suppose something is better than nothing.


Posted by ziptnf on May-14-2009 17:51:

I'll be sure to take off my tie dye shirt and cheer for Goa Gil anyways


Posted by supersaw abuse on May-14-2009 20:09:

Girl Talk if you want obnoxious hipsters, Oakey if you want washed-up trance crackers. Whoever wins, we lose.


Posted by nefardec on May-14-2009 20:37:

quote:
Originally posted by flavdave
He uses AudioMulch, not Cool Edit. That's probably why these opening DJs thought he was playing a pre-recorded file, because the screen didn't look like Ableton or Serato. He must be a fake!


when i opened for him he used cool edit (this was 2-3 years ago)


and yes, he pressed play, and then took his clothes off and put a pumpkin on his head and jumped into the crowd. i might even have a picture of the single stereo waveform gently chugging along.


he played here again a few months ago and this is from an interview with him:

http://cornellsun.com/section/arts/...l-talk-and-rock

quote:
Sun: What�s the difference between when you�re making mixes for your shows and just recording?

G.G.: Both kind of influences each other. I mean, everything I do on stage is live, everything by hand, I�ll go through 400 samples in real time. But I [do] have to prepare the arrangements beforehand. And a lot of it is [that] I like trying on new ideas at shows. And I even like doing new interpretations of previously existing albums. If people like this song or that song from an album, I�ll try doing a remix in a new way ...

Sun: So do you change up the samples a lot? Do you craft it differently for every show?

G.G.: For a tour, there�s usually a general base, but I like to prepare more material than I want to play so I can skip around a little bit if I feel like it. If I have time off, like this weekend�s shows are Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday and this week I prepared some new material, so tonight versus last weekend, there might [only] be two new minutes or new material in there.I do that every week and it adds up ... Like there�s some things I�ll play tonight that I�ll never play again.


Posted by whiskers on May-15-2009 03:12:

I have a dilemma too, Gogol Bordello, for the third epic time, or Oakenfold?


Saw Max Tundra, he uses an ipod, plays a bunch of different, weird instruments, sings, and dances like a crazy monkey. Pretty entertaining. A GOOD way to use pre-recorded base.


Posted by julien2 on May-15-2009 04:11:

Gogol Bordello.

Seriously, guys, anything but Oakenfold.


Posted by junkproject on May-15-2009 04:12:

As bad as oakenfold mixing skill, i rather see him than what i saw and heard from those video of girl talk.


Posted by supersaw abuse on May-15-2009 05:51:

quote:
Originally posted by whiskers
I have a dilemma too, Gogol Bordello, for the third epic time, or Oakenfold?


Saw Max Tundra, he uses an ipod, plays a bunch of different, weird instruments, sings, and dances like a crazy monkey. Pretty entertaining. A GOOD way to use pre-recorded base.


gogol bordello own a lot. go with them for sure


Posted by elFreak on May-15-2009 05:54:

i choose anger.

yeah martinez.


Posted by hkcpa on May-16-2009 12:48:

Girl Talk came to our college and it was pretty good. I would check him out.


Posted by the_voice on May-16-2009 14:32:

quote:
Originally posted by ziptnf is it some crap Vocal Trance?



omg i thought i was the only person that hated vocal trance

u should check out hes podcasts
http://www.pauloakenfold.com/news/623

as u can see its full of vocal shit


Posted by bobonoho on May-18-2009 00:28:

Pretty Lights is a great time, as is Girl Talk. I would not go to Oakenfold. I wish they had some good house or techno act. Sasha and Digweed were perfect.


Posted by bobonoho on May-18-2009 00:30:

dont miss nine inch nails either.


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.