Originally posted by jupiterone
personally, to me buttrich is over rated. i don't find any substance or groove in his records. it's all just flat-line, generic untz untz
and lol at minimal
yeah buttrich sucks. old school rob acid ftw though
this thread needs more rob hood
Posted by djhaziel on Aug-04-2009 04:05:
I 've always liked Cloudy bay from the man ... still do
Posted by david.michael on Aug-04-2009 12:50:
quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
yeah buttrich sucks. old school rob acid ftw though
this thread needs more rob hood
Man, I dunno. It just doesn't click with me. I "want" it to, but it just doesn't do the trick.
I like some damn repetitive music, but when you can have someone click the progress bar all over the track and not have any idea that you have moved in the song... it's a little much. I can listen to a good four-bar loop for a while, but these loops just aren't good enough for to hear for several minutes in a row.
I'm sure, drugged out in the middle of a crowd, it would do the trick.
I like the Buttrich tracks posted in here much better. Is all of Rob Hood's work similar to what you posted, or is that just all that I've heard? I'd be interested in seeing if he had something else to offer.
Posted by Guest on Aug-04-2009 13:55:
quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
Man, I dunno. It just doesn't click with me. I "want" it to, but it just doesn't do the trick.
I like some damn repetitive music, but when you can have someone click the progress bar all over the track and not have any idea that you have moved in the song... it's a little much. I can listen to a good four-bar loop for a while, but these loops just aren't good enough for to hear for several minutes in a row.
I'm sure, drugged out in the middle of a crowd, it would do the trick.
I like the Buttrich tracks posted in here much better. Is all of Rob Hood's work similar to what you posted, or is that just all that I've heard? I'd be interested in seeing if he had something else to offer.
Yea I dont get the whole Robert Hood cult following myself. Its the kind of techno that parents hear and think, what the heck are these kids thinking?
But I think the records are more for layering and hyperactive dj's who can't stop moving their hands and fidgeting. Posting the tracks on youtube individually doesnt help them much.
Plus I dont get why all of the tracks are so fast. If he slowed down a bit I might be able to feel some semblance of a groove. But you need to get below 130 to do that
Posted by david.michael on Aug-04-2009 14:41:
quote:
Originally posted by Guest
But I think the records are more for layering and hyperactive dj's who can't stop moving their hands and fidgeting. Posting the tracks on youtube individually doesnt help them much.
Very true, good point. I could see them working well as a DJ tool.
Agreed on slowing them down, though.
Posted by bigsnail on Aug-04-2009 18:24:
the vocals in this track suck ass
Posted by Clovis on Aug-04-2009 19:00:
You're about as deep as the ball pit at chuck-e-cheese
Posted by david.michael on Aug-04-2009 19:07:
quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
You're about as deep as the ball pit at chuck-e-cheese
Most of them have been removed, due to their unsanitary nature.
/irrelevant Posted by supersaw abuse on Aug-04-2009 19:18:
quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
You're about as deep as the ball pit at chuck-e-cheese
hehe
Posted by supersaw abuse on Aug-04-2009 19:19:
i still think sex in a ball pit would be the greatest thing ever
Posted by david.michael on Aug-04-2009 19:21:
quote:
Originally posted by supersaw abuse
i still think sex in a ball pit would be the greatest thing ever
Pedobear approves.
Posted by supersaw abuse on Aug-04-2009 19:22:
quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
Pedobear approves.
ugh, not like thatPosted by david.michael on Aug-04-2009 19:23:
FREAK!
Posted by Mr.Mystery on Aug-04-2009 21:39:
quote:
Originally posted by supersaw abuse
ugh, not like that
Yeah, I think it might just be the amount of balls surrounding you that does the trick.
Posted by sljiva on Aug-04-2009 23:02:
quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
Is all of Rob Hood's work similar to what you posted, or is that just all that I've heard? I'd be interested in seeing if he had something else to offer.
His style can vary quite a lot, his early stuff was like ultra minimalistic, skeleton techno, later he started to make deeper and funkier techno, although still quite minimalistic. He's interesting, at least for me, because even if his music is completely disposed of any unnecessary elements, you can still hear that specific Detroit warm sound in it, which is not the case with some other names of early minimal techno (Plastikman, Mika Vainio...).
My favourite track from him (this is like the definition of minimal techno, his most memorable track):
Something newer (you'll probably like this more, it sounds deeper, more modern and polished):
Title of this track is And Then We Planned Our Escape, it appears on already legendary Hoodmusic triology:
Posted by nefardec on Aug-04-2009 23:13:
quote:
Originally posted by sljiva
Title of this track is And Then We Planned Our Escape, it appears on already legendary Hoodmusic triology:
ah yes, i have ended a set with this.
rob hood, probably best listened to mixed.
as with anything, you're an idiot if you play only rob hood style minimal techno in a set, its power comes through its dynamic relationship with other tracks.
Posted by Existo22 on Aug-05-2009 09:12:
quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
You're about as deep as the ball pit at chuck-e-cheese
I'd like to see things from your point of view but I can't seem to get my head that far up my ass.
Posted by david.michael on Aug-05-2009 11:40:
I just don't get it, I suppose. The second two were okay but nothing that I would seek out or care to listen to by any means. I think I'd rather cut my ears off than listen to Minus again. I just find it to be absolutely terrible.
quote:
rob hood, probably best listened to mixed.
as with anything, you're an idiot if you play only rob hood style minimal techno in a set, its power comes through its dynamic relationship with other tracks.
Yeah, I hear ya there.
For me, the only time I'd be able to talk myself into using one of these tracks would be strictly as a DJ tool to layer over something else... and a simple one-bar loop would suffice rather than 6 - 8 minutes of that loop. (onoz gtfo laptop djs) Posted by Clovis on Aug-05-2009 19:07:
quote:
Originally posted by Existo22
I'd like to see things from your point of view but I can't seem to get my head that far up my ass.
The irony here is just absolutely astounding.
Posted by bubbleguuum on Aug-05-2009 22:06:
quote:
Originally posted by Guest
Plus I dont get why all of the tracks are so fast. If he slowed down a bit I might be able to feel some semblance of a groove. But you need to get below 130 to do that
There was a time where most techno was at 135-140bpm. Now if you go over 125 it's too fast :/
Posted by Existo22 on Aug-05-2009 22:23:
quote:
Originally posted by bubbleguuum
There was a time where most techno was at 135-140bpm. Now if you go over 125 it's too fast :/
People stop buying these crappy records with an ableton live loop and call it techno. This isn't techno. THIS is techno:
And this is trance:
And this is house:
Learn about the history of the music you are into or you will end up playing absolute SHIT music like clovis.
Posted by idoru on Aug-05-2009 23:45:
quote:
Originally posted by Existo22
Learn about the history of the music you are into or you will end up playing absolute SHIT music like clovis.
Not to speak for him or anything, but having known Clovis for years I can safely say that he is fantastically well-versed in his knowledge of musical history, both in electronic music and beyond. His palette of musical interests is incredibly diverse and he knows what the fuck he is talking about.
Also, what is your obsession here? We get it. You don't like "Minimal" or new "Techno." Good for you, that's great! Honestly, it is. However, there's no need to piss and moan like a five year-old that just dropped his ice cream cone. Go listen to what you want to listen to, go produce what you want to produce, go spin what you want to spin. Nobody is sitting here forcing music down your throat. You are the one who chooses to push play.
Then again, I've said this to you a million times already, so you're just a fucking retard at this point if you haven't listened to me.
Posted by supersaw abuse on Aug-06-2009 00:45:
quote:
Originally posted by idoru
Not to speak for him or anything, but having known Clovis for years I can safely say that he is fantastically well-versed in his knowledge of musical history, both in electronic music and beyond. His palette of musical interests is incredibly diverse and he knows what the fuck he is talking about.
Also, what is your obsession here? We get it. You don't like "Minimal" or new "Techno." Good for you, that's great! Honestly, it is. However, there's no need to piss and moan like a five year-old that just dropped his ice cream cone. Go listen to what you want to listen to, go produce what you want to produce, go spin what you want to spin. Nobody is sitting here forcing music down your throat. You are the one who chooses to push play.
Then again, I've said this to you a million times already, so you're just a fucking retard at this point if you haven't listened to me.
hey idoru i've seen your 'tar around, and i was kind of curious if you're actually affiliated with ghostly or if you're just a fan
Posted by jupiterone on Aug-06-2009 00:46:
quote:
Originally posted by supersaw abuse
hey idoru i've seen your 'tar around, and i was kind of curious if you're actually affiliated with ghostly or if you're just a fan
him and i manage the label
Posted by Clovis on Aug-06-2009 01:02:
quote:
Originally posted by Existo22
People stop buying these crappy records with an ableton live loop and call it techno. This isn't techno. THIS is techno:
And this is trance:
And this is house:
Learn about the history of the music you are into or you will end up playing absolute SHIT music like clovis.
It's great how you don't matter.
Pages (3): «1 [2] 3»