TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Appendix considered more valuable (than) then we thought
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by itsamemario on Aug-26-2009 02:00:

quote:
Originally posted by kadomony
i read the title as "more valuable than thought"


i think that's what he tried to say. "more valuable then thought" makes no fucking sense.


Posted by shaw on Aug-26-2009 03:13:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
i think that's what he tried to say. "more valuable then thought" makes no fucking sense.


quote:
Originally posted by shaw
so what did it decide?


Posted by Energy_3 on Aug-26-2009 03:33:

quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous
so what did it decide?


its interesting how its turned into a god Vs nature debate... lol

its funny how threads derail at some point in time.

I think we should leave christianity out of this as its getting messy

I would love to share my opinion on the nature of the gospel but for the purposes of those here i shall not..! One thing i have found though from being here on holiday is that Americans in general those associated with the church are more fanatical then those back home in Australia, perhaps a more induced state of religious psychosis due to the overwhelming collective nature of the institution found here.

Anyway what about the bloody appendix...? are we that silly to disregard something?

shit LOL i just realized what you were getting at in the title. I mean "WE" thats what happens when you dont pay attention to what your doing!


Posted by shaw on Aug-26-2009 03:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Energy_3
its interesting how its turned into a god Vs nature debate... lol

its funny how threads derail at some point in time.

I think we should leave christianity out of this as its getting messy

I would love to share my opinion on the nature of the gospel but for the purposes of those here i shall not..! One thing i have found though from being here on holiday is that Americans in general those associated with the church are more fanatical then those back home in Australia, perhaps a more induced state of religious psychosis due to the overwhelming collective nature of the institution found here.

Anyway what about the bloody appendix...? are we that silly to disregard something?

shit LOL i just realized what you were getting at in the title. I mean "WE" thats what happens when you dont pay attention to what your doing!


you leave my doing out of this!


Posted by itsamemario on Aug-26-2009 03:55:

Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

You've still got it fucking wrong.

http://grammartips.homestead.com/than.html


Posted by Krypton on Aug-26-2009 04:01:

I got my taken out. One of the most painful experiences of my life.


Posted by Sunsnail on Aug-26-2009 04:03:

quit being stupider at english than norwegian stabass over here


Posted by Energy_3 on Aug-26-2009 04:33:

Re: Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
You've still got it fucking wrong.

http://grammartips.homestead.com/than.html


edit* just for you - forgive my english i was raised in a barn with little or no education.

I wish i was well aquatinted thoroughly with the use of than english but forgive me i'm not - do give me pardon.

i shall remember for next time!


Posted by Energy_3 on Aug-26-2009 04:33:

quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous
you leave my doing out of this!


all good!


Posted by Energy_3 on Aug-26-2009 04:51:


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Aug-26-2009 05:31:

Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

quote:
Originally posted by Energy_3


Its funny the ignorance of humans just because the physiological response isn't obvious imediately or, that they are able to pin point accuratelty through scientific method, they argue that something is useless in the case of the appendix. Cleary it serves a purpose to a greater or lesser extent even if not known by humans. As its exists soley for the purpose of function - which is my argument. But then maybe im wrong, maybe it is nothing.



Right.. but you do realise there are tons of vestigial phenotypes that exist with many animals

for example femurs and pelvic bones in whales.
this also occurs in snakes
goosebumps in humans (we are hairless it serves no purpose).

the appendix was thought to be vestigial because it was infectious and when removed people lived better lives without it. Obviously new evidence comes up all the time when dealing with evolutoin and vestigial accounts. Mose family trees and clades are hypothesized and there is always contraversy in their ranking and relationship. Science is always changeing. Errors and corrections in science isn't a means to say humans are ignorant and the theories are simply vague guesses. Theory's change from time to time. Look at Newtons kinematic equations dealing with velocity and time as costant. Used for hundreds of years now they have been disproven by einstein as time is no longer considered constant, but instead relative. Its the fine print behind evolution the minor details which change frequently as new evidence is brought to the table (cladistics).

Back to the appendix. it didn't "CLEARLY" serve a purpose as explained in the article since the purpose was just recently found out.

Unless you have some hard evidence to bring to the table before you call generations of scientists who study this stuff day in and day out ignorant, i suggest you do some research.


Posted by bigjimslade002 on Aug-26-2009 07:53:

well im screwed then...lost mine a long time ago


Posted by Energy_3 on Aug-26-2009 15:00:

Re: Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
Right.. but you do realise there are tons of vestigial phenotypes that exist with many animals

for example femurs and pelvic bones in whales.
this also occurs in snakes
goosebumps in humans (we are hairless it serves no purpose).

the appendix was thought to be vestigial because it was infectious and when removed people lived better lives without it. Obviously new evidence comes up all the time when dealing with evolutoin and vestigial accounts. Mose family trees and clades are hypothesized and there is always contraversy in their ranking and relationship. Science is always changeing. Errors and corrections in science isn't a means to say humans are ignorant and the theories are simply vague guesses. Theory's change from time to time. Look at Newtons kinematic equations dealing with velocity and time as costant. Used for hundreds of years now they have been disproven by einstein as time is no longer considered constant, but instead relative. Its the fine print behind evolution the minor details which change frequently as new evidence is brought to the table (cladistics).

Back to the appendix. it didn't "CLEARLY" serve a purpose as explained in the article since the purpose was just recently found out.

Unless you have some hard evidence to bring to the table before you call generations of scientists who study this stuff day in and day out ignorant, i suggest you do some research.


When i mean ignorant i mean simply this "the state of being uneducated or uninformed" and i am particularly interested in the latter. And, when i speak of this i speak of it in general terms in so far that we are quick to refute possibilities from time to time when scientific scrutiny fails to provide adequate outcome. Perhaps naive would have been a better word to use. And yes i agree with you as there is always possibility, and of course two sides or more to every argument.

but i also stand by your opinion as i never really precluded to any absolute idea i merely presented a possibility.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Aug-26-2009 16:17:

Re: Re: Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

quote:
Originally posted by Energy_3
When i mean ignorant i mean simply this "the state of being uneducated or uninformed" and i am particularly interested in the latter. And, when i speak of this i speak of it in general terms in so far that we are quick to refute possibilities from time to time when scientific scrutiny fails to provide adequate outcome. Perhaps naive would have been a better word to use. And yes i agree with you as there is always possibility, and of course two sides or more to every argument.

but i also stand by your opinion as i never really precluded to any absolute idea i merely presented a possibility.


Fair enough. My impression was that you were using this case to refute the theory of evolution by saying all vestigial organs serve a purpose.

maybe i jumped the gun a bit


Posted by Energy_3 on Aug-26-2009 16:46:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
Fair enough. My impression was that you were using this case to refute the theory of evolution by saying all vestigial organs serve a purpose.

maybe i jumped the gun a bit


nah no not at all,. i love opinions its the best thing/way to advance in knowledge. I know very little about biology my back ground is psychology though it fascinates me a great deal, all the subjects to life.


Posted by itsamemario on Aug-26-2009 17:24:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

quote:
Originally posted by Energy_3
nah no not at all,. i love opinions its the best thing/way to advance in knowledge. I know very little about biology my back ground is psychology though it fascinates me a great deal, all the subjects to life.


get angry, you untrollable bastard!


Posted by Energy_3 on Aug-26-2009 17:27:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
get angry, you untrollable bastard!


nah we cant we both have pussies as our avatar.... and i wouldnt want to join the already overwhelming group of angry's in here!


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Aug-26-2009 17:43:

quote:
Originally posted by stren
cor version pls


if you've had your appendix taken out you are fucked


Posted by Sunsnail on Aug-26-2009 19:03:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
if you've had your appendix taken out you are fucked


New medications work in sync with the appendix and can cure cancer, AIDS, and swine flu


Posted by Fledz on Sep-01-2009 07:51:

Re: Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

So it's another theory? I think it's an interesting one but they clearly haven't found any solid, earth shattering data yet. Makes sense though that the appendix would at least have some sort of use.

I'm very interested in the part about them possibly using it to actually aid in medicine. Now that would be a great find.

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
Right.. but you do realise there are tons of vestigial phenotypes that exist with many animals

for example goosebumps in humans (we are hairless it serves no purpose).
That's wrong. They do serve the same purpose as before just less efficiently. I don't know about you but I'm not hairless and neither is any other human I've ever met


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Sep-01-2009 10:39:

Re: Re: Re: Appendix considered more valuable then WE thought

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
So it's another theory? I think it's an interesting one but they clearly haven't found any solid, earth shattering data yet. Makes sense though that the appendix would at least have some sort of use.

I'm very interested in the part about them possibly using it to actually aid in medicine. Now that would be a great find.

That's wrong. They do serve the same purpose as before just less efficiently. I don't know about you but I'm not hairless and neither is any other human I've ever met


and would we also use our vestigial tail for balance when runing?

Lets be a bit rational here. The lack of hair on a human body would make for a faulty warning system against predators.


Posted by Fledz on Sep-01-2009 10:52:

Warning system? Huh? Goosebumps are designed for warmth not to warn against predators


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Sep-01-2009 11:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Warning system? Huh? Goosebumps are designed for warmth not to warn against predators


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goose_bumps


Posted by Fledz on Sep-01-2009 11:03:

Ah I see but regardless it's a secondary response, even that wiki article shows it. In humans it's mainly for warmth (or at least it was).


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Sep-01-2009 11:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Ah I see but regardless it's a secondary response, even that wiki article shows it. In humans it's mainly for warmth (or at least it was).


sure.. not very effective unless you're a hairy mofo lol.

for instance it serves no purpose to certain racial groups or peoples which tend to have little to no hair.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.