TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- "Creativity without constraints is irrelevant." Do you really need all you have?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by Zak McKracken on Sep-05-2009 15:09:

beacuse the sound isnt the same we dont have analog distortion!


Posted by Rusty O'Hara on Sep-05-2009 15:15:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
And he uses Cubase VST 5, released back in 2000.


I still miss Cubase 5...


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Sep-05-2009 15:17:

Reminds me of a post from MD:
quote:
Originally posted by stev�sto
i think you and many others around here should stop masturbating to how clean a synth sounds or, wow listen to that subtle supersaw or, ooh that bass is much tighter than your average bass ... and just pay attention to what makes it a song in the first place. too much emphasis on production quality these days and not enough creativity. back in the day all we had was an 808 and 4 track recorders, we had to compensate the lack of production quality with creativity. i think we're getting spoiled, it used to be you could only afford so many vinyls in your crate but you made it work with what you had, but now we have millions of mp3s on our hard drive and scratch our head when it comes to thinking of what to play next. we used to only have so many production tools to work with but we made amazing tracks with what we had, now we're flooded with capabilities and better sound quality but when it comes down to sitting down and making something unique and inspiring we end up making crap like what you posted.

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&postid=9383188


Posted by Floorfiller on Sep-05-2009 15:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Terrence Parker
Check out the producer masterclass with Nathan Fake, this guy is a real inspirarion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aIARLPv3MU


HAHAHA i have that same old Casio Keyboard. Gawd that thing is old


The demo song on it is

Wham - wake me up before you go go


Posted by Rusty O'Hara on Sep-05-2009 15:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
Wham - wake me up before you go go



Awesome


Posted by Terrence Parker on Sep-05-2009 17:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
HAHAHA i have that same old Casio Keyboard. Gawd that thing is old


The demo song on it is

Wham - wake me up before you go go


Time to make a remix.


Posted by Energy_3 on Sep-05-2009 17:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Terrence Parker
Time to make a remix.


and this, i was thinking make a remix of this last night
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgZm8okgH6c


Posted by Terrence Parker on Sep-05-2009 18:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Energy_3
and this, i was thinking make a remix of this last night
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgZm8okgH6c

80s
I would like to see a nice NuDisco/Prog House remix of the BMX Bandits Theme. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp-lG3sn0rY
Hard to get any good samples.


Posted by Energy_3 on Sep-05-2009 18:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Terrence Parker
80s
I would like to see a nice NuDisco/Prog House remix of the BMX Bandits Theme. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp-lG3sn0rY
Hard to get any good samples.


yip, bless the 80's. some of the best tunes come from that period'.


Posted by PutBoy on Sep-05-2009 20:03:

That Burial choon is fucking wicked. :O Love it to death. How he did this in Soundforge, I don't no idea

I have to have that album!


Posted by Fledz on Sep-06-2009 01:27:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Reminds me of a post from MD:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&postid=9383188

I agree with what he's saying but we need to find a middle ground. Let's face it, a lot of music back then was horribly produced but the melodies and ideas were great. These days everything is extremely polished but a lot of it lacks any substance.

The best tracks are the ones that use the new techniques and much better production quality, but still compose a song with love and original ideas.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Sep-06-2009 01:57:

I disagree that old production was "horrible." People say that now because they are used to everything being drenched in effects, twenty tracks of percussion, and compressed to shit, but personally a lot of the time I prefer the simpler, rawer, and yet more spaciously mixed tracks of ten to fifteen years ago.


Posted by Fledz on Sep-06-2009 02:22:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
I disagree that old production was "horrible." People say that now because they are used to everything being drenched in effects, twenty tracks of percussion, and compressed to shit, but personally a lot of the time I prefer the simpler, rawer, and yet more spaciously mixed tracks of ten to fifteen years ago.

I didn't say all of it.

Plus 10 years ago was 1999. Take many tracks from early 90s or even late 90s and a lot of them while compositionally good have the sound quality of a clogged toilet.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Sep-06-2009 02:24:

IMO the percentage of "horrible" production was no higher back then than it is now. The difference is now that people have learned to think of polished hypercompressed turds as "normal" rather than "shit."


Posted by Fledz on Sep-06-2009 02:28:

And that's what I'm getting at, we've gone too far with production values because we're attributing more focus on the engineering rather than the song writing. We need a middle ground.


Posted by Akridrot on Sep-06-2009 03:37:

A musical engineer, haha.


Posted by Energy_3 on Sep-06-2009 08:45:

its like most things, things were built differently in the past, some could even argue better than they are today. but ultimately the difference is still tanjably good.


Posted by Cryogen on Sep-06-2009 10:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
I didn't say all of it.

Plus 10 years ago was 1999. Take many tracks from early 90s or even late 90s and a lot of them while compositionally good have the sound quality of a clogged toilet.


Have you got any examples of late 90s tracks with the sound quality of a clogged toilet ?

I started buying Trance in 99 and from what I remember the sound was better then than it is now.


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.