TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Mnimal and Tech-house
Pages (8): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 »
As much as I hate siding with Beatport, "minimal" has become a de facto genre; like it or not.
Minimal alone is usually associated with Minimal Techno. Then there's Micro House ... etc genre battles...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Gen3r4l1ty As much as I hate siding with Beatport, "minimal" has become a de facto genre; like it or not. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Simon Be-at.tv Beatport would disagree with you there... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Simon Be-at.tv oh and why you're asking a trance forum is beyond me! I'm amazed you haven't been hung drawn and quartered for even mentioning the M word! Almost as bad as saying Deadmau5! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Simon Be-at.tv Minimal (speaking incredibly generally) is usually a bit slower than tech house and has less clearly melodic elements. Tech house is usually closer to house music in terms of speed and bounceyness (getting technical here). However, many producers of house who dip into the minimal artforms may brand it as tech house as many people are scared of the word minimal. Its all fish at the end of day... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Simon Be-at.tv How very snarkey of you... oh and Juno, Trackitdown, DJdownload, Itunes blah blah blah blah Wanna prostrate yourself before the almighty deciders of the genres? On your knees swine! |

| quote: |
| Minimal alone is usually associated with Minimal Techno. |
Well, with Existo gone I guess someone had to take her crown.

| quote: |
| Originally posted by woscar Oh, yeah. Beatport says so, it MUST be the truth!!! This place stopped being a "trance forum" a long time ago. You should have noticed it by now if you weren't so busy spamming your website. Wrong. On all counts. Minimal has nothing to do with speed. And why would anyone be "scared" of it? And 'bounceyness'. Technical? |
We hate bad music and we love good music. That's pretty much it.
And if you paid any attention to that moronic thread, it was pretty much one person hating on something that she obviously has no fucking clue about.
And "sarcastic" is not the same as "ironic".
Cuntbutler.
LOL ****butler... ... nice post.
(not being 'sarcastic' this time as you correctly put me in my box there!)
Sub jonra labels were invented by distributers to make it easier to sell.
As in 'tecno stile jondras'?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by woscar Well, with Existo gone I guess someone had to take her crown. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by woscar We hate bad music and we love good music. That's pretty much it. And if you paid any attention to that moronic thread, it was pretty much one person hating on something that she obviously has no fucking clue about. And "sarcastic" is not the same as "ironic". Cuntbutler. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Simon Be-at.tv Why do you hate siding with Beatport? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by david.michael ...I hardly think that they should be an authority just because they are large and exist. ![]() |
What's the alternative?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Simon Be-at.tv who's Existo then? Just curious but... what comes up as good music in your very official sounding opinion? |
how subtle
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Gen3r4l1ty As much as I hate siding with Beatport, "minimal" has become a de facto genre; like it or not. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by woscar My taste is way too ample. EDM-wise? If you actually care, just check the links on my sig. |
It still doesn't mean it's correct.
All jokes aside...
Listen to some old tracks on Wolf + Lamb that are labeled Minimal. Then go listen to Minus tracks that are labeled Minimal. Not even close.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by woscar It still doesn't mean it's correct. All jokes aside... Listen to some old tracks on Wolf + Lamb that are labeled Minimal. Then go listen to Minus tracks that are labeled Minimal. Not even close. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Simon Be-at.tv Beatport would disagree with you there... . |
I wrote on this forum because this is the most popular EDM forum,hence will get more opinions.
I think they should really break this forum into a few EDM categories i.e. Trance Discussion, House Discussion etc....why not do it? That way l have asked in the appropriate music section
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Simon Be-at.tv Beatport would disagree with you there... oh and why you're asking a trance forum is beyond me! I'm amazed you haven't been hung drawn and quartered for even mentioning the M word! Almost as bad as saying Deadmau5! Minimal (speaking incredibly generally) is usually a bit slower than tech house and has less clearly melodic elements. Tech house is usually closer to house music in terms of speed and bounceyness (getting technical here). However, many producers of house who dip into the minimal artforms may brand it as tech house as many people are scared of the word minimal. Its all fish at the end of day... |
Minimal: Bleep Bloop.
Tech-house: Plink Plonk.
Haha that is brilliant!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nostalgic Minimal: Bleep Bloop. Tech-house: Plink Plonk. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.