TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Poker Thread
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

patrik antonius, the one and only jedi, and my fav pro.

quote:

Originally posted by Rodrico what were you guys playing at the table?

pot limit hold 'em. wasn't anything serious, he's a friend of a friend and happened to be around for one of our monthlies a while ago.

quote:

Originally posted by UWM pot limit hold 'em. wasn't anything serious, he's a friend of a friend and happened to be around for one of our monthlies a while ago.

Ah thats pretty cool, im sure he wasnt being his poker brat self with you guys...must have tons of great stories.

Yeah he was definitely more chill, we were drinking beers and bullshitting. Good stories for sure. I got him on a semi-bad beat once and told him "I can dodge bullets, baby!" That got a good laugh.

haha, good show.

I will tell you that he is only cool at the poker table. I saw him at a club and he looks like a nerd with his leather jacket and sunglasses on. yea, he wore the same crap he wore at the tables.

quote:

Originally posted by Boomer187 I will tell you that he is only cool at the poker table. I saw him at a club and he looks like a nerd with his leather jacket and sunglasses on. yea, he wore the same crap he wore at the tables.

And the supercuts haircut from the 80's. lol.

quote:

Originally posted by Rodrico Im gonna stop you here, and just say, if you think Dwan's call is horrible, then you need to re-evaluate your poker strategy and thought process.

which call are we talking about? postflop? it wasn't a good call. i probably would've made it (depending on the size of the bet in relation to the size of the pot and my own stack, i can't remember what it was exactly) hoping to catch a draw, 2 pair, a set, or to represent an A but after the turn i'm out if i miss- i'm losing money most of the time by playing it like he did. he got lucky and you know it. he has to assume that his opponent holds AK or a big pocket pair, which means he wasn't drawing to anything except his kicker or a set with a 10, and he has to worry about a flush draw and a gutshot draw with KQ/QJ/KJ post flop. and the ace. tell me what made calling a five-outer when the original raiser was obviously representing a big pocket pair or AKs a good call? look at his odds postflop- 16%. awful. what if dude had AA (he played his hand like he could've had that) and caught a set on the flop? i'm drawing dead. furthermore, 2 of my outs (the Jh and 10h) make possible flushes for my opponent- so i'm only feeling REALLY comfortable about 3 of my outs (Js, Jd, 10c). and the jack makes a believable (but unlikely) straight possibility.

or even calling after the re-raise preflop, when again the re-raiser telegraphed "i have a big hand"? it was a loose call that he got lucky with. 9 times out of 10 that hand is gonna fucking fail against KK. if the turn wasn't a J or a 10 he would've had to lay it down or make a play at it; both of which would've concluded with him losing money (since his opponent was most likely going to call any bet, as he demonstrated by making the horrendous call on the river). the only thing i credit him for is inducing the call on the river by overbetting, but the way the hand was played and the amount of money that was already in play, he was going to call anything imo. dwan took advantage of the guy with the big pocket pair because he felt backed into a corner, investing a ton of money (~$100,000 pre-river) on a big pre-flop hand that failed him.

both of those hands i'm shocked he got his opponents to lay it down/call with whatever hands they had. call me a tight player i guess but i would'nt have played those cards that way at all. i would've been more likely to raise after the continuation bet on the flop, playing my position in an effort to get him off of his big pocket pair (hoping that he doesn't hold an A)- sure i wouldn't have made as much money (unless he called, so when the turn hits the same result would've occurred) but i would've possibly stolen the pot from a far superior hand. or again, i would've called hoping for a miracle and then folded after the turn (unless the turn was a scare card for my opponent, or a big drawing card for myself).

i'd love to hear what you would've done though and how/why your logic differs from mine so much- seriously interested, and maybe i'm thinking about it the wrong way.

quote:

Originally posted by Boomer187 remember too that these individual hands being played in-between hundreds of hands. You really build a personality at a table over that many hands and can use it to your advantage. So we will never know the context of these plays, you just had to be there.

+1, i'm speculating on this single hand and this hand alone solely because i wasn't there to participate in the entire game. it's all speculation, again.

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_Blue which call are we talking about? postflop? it wasn't a good call. i probably would've made it (depending on the size of the bet in relation to the size of the pot and my own stack, i can't remember what it was exactly) hoping to catch a draw, 2 pair, a set, or to represent an A but after the turn i'm out if i miss- i'm losing money most of the time by playing it like he did. he got lucky and you know it. he has to assume that his opponent holds AK or a big pocket pair, which means he wasn't drawing to anything except his kicker or a set with a 10, and he has to worry about a flush draw and a gutshot draw with KQ/QJ/KJ post flop. and the ace. tell me what made calling a five-outer when the original raiser was obviously representing a big pocket pair or AKs a good call? look at his odds postflop- 16%. awful. what if dude had AA (he played his hand like he could've had that) and caught a set on the flop? i'm drawing dead. furthermore, 2 of my outs (the Jh and 10h) make possible flushes for my opponent- so i'm only feeling REALLY comfortable about 3 of my outs (Js, Jd, 10c). and the jack makes a believable (but unlikely) straight possibility. or even calling after the re-raise preflop, when again the re-raiser telegraphed "i have a big hand"? it was a loose call that he got lucky with. 9 times out of 10 that hand is gonna fucking fail against KK. if the turn wasn't a J or a 10 he would've had to lay it down or make a play at it; both of which would've concluded with him losing money (since his opponent was most likely going to call any bet, as he demonstrated by making the horrendous call on the river). the only thing i credit him for is inducing the call on the river by overbetting, but the way the hand was played and the amount of money that was already in play, he was going to call anything imo. dwan took advantage of the guy with the big pocket pair because he felt backed into a corner, investing a ton of money (~$100,000 pre-river) on a big pre-flop hand that failed him. both of those hands i'm shocked he got his opponents to lay it down/call with whatever hands they had. call me a tight player i guess but i would'nt have played those cards that way at all. i would've been more likely to raise after the continuation bet on the flop, playing my position in an effort to get him off of his big pocket pair (hoping that he doesn't hold an A)- sure i wouldn't have made as much money (unless he called, so when the turn hits the same result would've occurred) but i would've possibly stolen the pot from a far superior hand. or again, i would've called hoping for a miracle and then folded after the turn (unless the turn was a scare card for my opponent, or a big drawing card for myself). i'd love to hear what you would've done though and how/why your logic differs from mine so much- seriously interested, and maybe i'm thinking about it the wrong way. +1, i'm speculating on this single hand and this hand alone solely because i wasn't there to participate in the entire game. it's all speculation, again.

Again, Dwan already represented a big hand with a re-raise preflop and called another re-raise with position. Dwan's advantage the whole way is position on a person who he has narrowed his range inbetween 1-3 hands preflop, and post flop down to 1-2 by what his opponent does. Now that Meltzer is outta position, and with little clue to Dwan's holding, the fact that Dwan could make a play at the pot, or just win it straight up by outdrawing, he has great incentive to play the pot post flop by just calling. Also, Meltzer is a somewhat tight player and Dwan is hyper aggresive, you dont have that information by just seeing the hand. But by folding here, is a big loss (30k), you will notice that lots of good players like to float the flop to the turn with middle pair, because the hand isnt over and you can re-draw on the turn as well.

You obviously play more on the cards, which is fine, but come time to playing guys who know their stuff, theyre gonna start picking you off. You are the equivilant of Phil Hellmuth at Cash Games, its not bad, but dont expect good players to pay you off unless you get really lucky with set ups.

I would have played the hand exactly as you stated above...before I started winning at live poker. Honestly I doubt I would have done the same thing as I am not that great at poker. After playing a few tourneys and cash games I have found playing by the book (mostly tight) will only get you so far. Usually the new players will use book strategy and lose their ass at the table over time. Mostly to guys that have played for years that caught a straight on a 3 5 off suit.

There are times where you toss the book out. It either lands you big wins or some big losses. If you play your opponent correctly, it usually ends up good most of the time. Poker is not cheap and you have to be willing to lose 10X what you have on the table. When you value your stack too much, you usually never win big, rather lose slowly. So do not be afraid to venture from strategy I think is what I am saying.

I'm on my phone so I can't quote you two, but yeah sure, I agree; we would have to play sometime because I'm by no means a by-the-book player, I'm just saying that as slim of the odds he had of winning, his pot odds and implied odds did not warrant a call post-flop. At best he's getting a little more than 1-to-1 odds on his money, which imo isn't worth the call for a %16 chance of winning at showdown.

Like I said before though, that's not saying I wouldn't have called, the postflop bet was almost too cheap not to call (about a sixth of his stack, if I'm doing the math right?) so I would've called hoping to catch a miracle but expecting to fold. If I totally missed I wouldn't feel comfortable bluffing on the turn the way the hand had played out and I have doubts that dwan would've done so (had he missed).

Now that you mention it, I failed to assess the fact that he raised the original bettor so I understand now why he felt he could play his position and his implied hand strength.. again, though, after the turn he pretty much had a made hand, so the only tough decision making he had to do was what action to perform post-flop. And I'm still gonna contend that after the turn he just got lucky, and his opponent just played badly.

Edit: rod you seem to be focusing on the players habits and dispositions which I can't speculate on because I have no idea how either of them play and have only one hand to judge their behaviors on. All good points though.

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_Blue I'm on my phone so I can't quote you two, but yeah sure, I agree; we would have to play sometime because I'm by no means a by-the-book player, I'm just saying that as slim of the odds he had of winning, his pot odds and implied odds did not warrant a call post-flop. At best he's getting a little more than 1-to-1 odds on his money, which imo isn't worth the call for a %16 chance of winning at showdown. Like I said before though, that's not saying I wouldn't have called, the postflop bet was almost too cheap not to call (about a sixth of his stack, if I'm doing the math right?) so I would've called hoping to catch a miracle but expecting to fold. If I totally missed I wouldn't feel comfortable bluffing on the turn the way the hand had played out and I have doubts that dwan would've done so (had he missed). Now that you mention it, I failed to assess the fact that he raised the original bettor so I understand now why he felt he could play his position and his implied hand strength.. again, though, after the turn he pretty much had a made hand, so the only tough decision making he had to do was what action to perform post-flop. And I'm still gonna contend that after the turn he just got lucky, and his opponent just played badly. Edit: rod you seem to be focusing on the players habits and dispositions which I can't speculate on because I have no idea how either of them play and have only one hand to judge their behaviors on. All good points though.

This calls for a match! I will arraign the table, you two arraign a flight and hotel. We will play til the death...or the loss of $40, whichever is first.

quote:

Originally posted by Boomer187 This calls for a match! I will arraign the table, you two arraign a flight and hotel. We will play til the death...or the loss of $40, whichever is first.

Hey man, i'd love to play with you fellas in a full-seated cash game. I usually play 3-5 no limit, 5-5 plo, or 5-10 omaha hi-lo at the local casino. You still live around vegas right?

This thread makes me want to play poker again... Not enough time these days

i used to play a lot on myspace haha..
but that place is full of donks that its just annoying playing there.

Thread title edited. I miss poker too, haven't played real poker for a year orsmth I think, I'm only playing on FB now, tho I think I've got a game coming up next month

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_Blue Hey man, i'd love to play with you fellas in a full-seated cash game. I usually play 3-5 no limit, 5-5 plo, or 5-10 omaha hi-lo at the local casino. You still live around vegas right?

I live INSIDE of Vegas.

I stick to 1-2 NL becaue of my lack of bank roll. Also you get a lot of tourist to play 1-2 cause its cheap.

look at those sportsman competing ! impressive performance !

that blind guy deserves the most credit!

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_Blue Hey man, i'd love to play with you fellas in a full-seated cash game. I usually play 3-5 no limit, 5-5 plo, or 5-10 omaha hi-lo at the local casino. You still live around vegas right?

I play 2/5 NLHE and 5/5 NLHE at the local casino, and varied games around the underground games of Toronto. We dont have many PLO games running, but a bunch of my buddies love the game so we run a fun 1/2 PLO High. I visit Vegas twice a year so im definately down for some cash games when I get to swing by. My buddies and I are planning a trip soon, for either reading week or after school semester is done to make a week long trip down there (were all sick degenerate poker heads).

quote:

Originally posted by Boomer187 I live INSIDE of Vegas. I stick to 1-2 NL becaue of my lack of bank roll. Also you get a lot of tourist to play 1-2 cause its cheap.

Was talkin to a regular in Vegas, he says the Hard Rock Casino is a gold mine for scooping college kids 1/2 money...all drunk and partying and dont care. I was contemplating going to see the action hehe.

quote:

Originally posted by Rodrico Was talkin to a regular in Vegas, he says the Hard Rock Casino is a gold mine for scooping college kids 1/2 money...all drunk and partying and dont care. I was contemplating going to see the action hehe.

That place is good, so is the Mirage. Excalibur was awesome when they had the electronic dealers. You would get soo many people with large yard Margarettas sitting down. I would have their money within the half hour.

Holiday weekends are the best too.

What's the average/typical buy-in for 1-2NL in your guys' area? The poker room guys here say they will never start a 1-2 no limit because it's "too volatile" of a game. Wtf.

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_Blue What's the average/typical buy-in for 1-2NL in your guys' area? The poker room guys here say they will never start a 1-2 no limit because it's "too volatile" of a game. Wtf.

depending on the house, I have seen $60 (min) - $200 max buy in for 1/2. It is volatile. Late at night when teh drunks come out of the clubs you will usually get 2 or 3 that go in almost every hand and waste through 3 or 4 buy ins. sucks when you lose a big hand to them and they lose it easily to someone else the next hand.

Usually its about what Boomer said, I try not to play 1/2 as much as possible on my free time, but I do run a 1/2 NL game lol so i pretty much play 5 times a week. I usually like to stick to a bit higher limits for myself cause I like the action and more money. Casinos are yummy. I always said that 1/2 players are the hardest to deal with, cause to most people $60 to $100 is just a half days work, and in the end its not gonna hurt, so going all in every other hand just to screw around wont cost you much. But at those higher limits, most people think twice about blowing a buy in of $200 to $500.

quote:

Originally posted by Rodrico Usually its about what Boomer said, I try not to play 1/2 as much as possible on my free time, but I do run a 1/2 NL game lol so i pretty much play 5 times a week. I usually like to stick to a bit higher limits for myself cause I like the action and more money. Casinos are yummy. I always said that 1/2 players are the hardest to deal with, cause to most people $60 to $100 is just a half days work, and in the end its not gonna hurt, so going all in every other hand just to screw around wont cost you much. But at those higher limits, most people think twice about blowing a buy in of $200 to $500.

My friend used to say that til he moved to vegas and played some higher limit games. He saw lots of people where blowing a $2k buy in was nothing. That scared me into developing a strategy that worked at a limit I can take.

But I agree, most anyone can buy into a 1-2 game and blow the buy, more so than higher limits.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.