TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Your kid turns out to be (heavily) retarded..
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »


Posted by MJM74 on Dec-24-2009 21:07:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Yeah some legal shit.

But sorry, to answer your original question...yes I would consider euthanasia. Again, the ethics of the situation depend on the values of people involved, and if laws were in place in society that allowed euthanasia, I would do it.



So what would you do if your child lived a happy childhood normal & then got very sick for some reason & ends up mentally challenged because of whatever caused them to end up that way.. Lets say you child was a teenager.

What would you do then?



Posted by Frenkieee on Dec-24-2009 21:09:

quote:
Originally posted by MJM74
So what would you do if your child lived a happy childhood normal & then got very sick for some reason & ends up mentally challenged because of whatever caused them to end up that way.. Lets say you child was a teenager.

What would you do then?

As much as I applaud the fact that you try to think along with me, she already answered that:
quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
yes I would consider euthanasia


Posted by Silky Johnson on Dec-24-2009 21:27:

It would depend on their level of impairment and how much I would be able to care for them. If they were impaired to the point that their needs couldn't be met by myself alone, I would put them in the care of social services. But if it was so bad that their quality of life was significantly diminished and/or they had little to no autonomy, for sure I would consider euthanasia.


Posted by MJM74 on Dec-24-2009 21:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Frenkieee
As much as I applaud the fact that you try to think along with me, she already answered that:




quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
It would depend on their level of impairment and how much I would be able to care for them. If they were impaired to the point that their needs couldn't be met by myself alone, I would put them in the care of social services. But if it was so bad that their quality of life was significantly diminished and/or they had little to no autonomy, for sure I would consider euthanasia.


I understood she would to this during the early stages of pregnancy. She is staing that she would consider euthanasia to her own flesh & blood & because of an accident that resulted in her poor child ending up mentally challenged she would do this?



Posted by Silky Johnson on Dec-24-2009 21:40:

I just answered your question in the post above yours.


Posted by MJM74 on Dec-24-2009 21:48:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
I just answered your question in the post above yours.


I know you did. I quoted Frenkieee so he could understand what I was reading about what you posted.


So I guess you would kill your own child because they got sick & ended up mentally challanged?
That's sad.
I can understand putting them in the care of social services but to kill your own child?



Posted by Silky Johnson on Dec-24-2009 21:50:

Your values are not my values. I value quality of life and autonomy, and if my child could have neither of those things anymore, hell yes I would, as they say, "put him/her out of his/her misery."


Posted by Frenkieee on Dec-24-2009 21:51:

quote:
Originally posted by MJM74
So I guess you would kill your own child because they got sick & ended up mentally challanged?
That's sad.
I can understand putting them in the care of social services but to kill your own child?

Now you're taking things out of context a bit, because there's quite a difference between mentally challenged and someone who's not capable of anything more than breathing.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Dec-24-2009 21:52:

It's ok, I can guarantee you his beliefs are rooted some kind of Christian or religious, non-rational bullshit.


Posted by Frenkieee on Dec-24-2009 21:54:

Yeah, I guess you'd have to be atheist (or the likes) to consider 'killing' your own blood.

Thank god (ghehe) all that religious crap has gone past me all my life.


Posted by MJM74 on Dec-24-2009 21:57:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Your values are not my values. I value quality of life and autonomy, and if my child could have neither of those things anymore, hell yes I would, as they say, "put him/her out of his/her misery."


but all in all it shows how much you really value quality of life.


quote:
Originally posted by Frenkieee
Now you're taking things out of context a bit, because there's quite a difference between mentally challenged and someone who's not capable of anything more than breathing.


That I can understand. You are right, there is a big defference but even then it sad for someone to even think that way.




Posted by MJM74 on Dec-24-2009 21:59:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
It's ok, I can guarantee you his beliefs are rooted some kind of Christian or religious, non-rational bullshit.


Nope.



Posted by Lira on Dec-24-2009 22:28:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
What ethical issue? The ethics of the issue are dependent upon the values of the people involved. For me, there there wouldn't be any kind of dilemma. And since it is entirely legal to terminate a pregnancy if you know there is a detrimental defect, it supports the decision I would make.

Unlike regular abortion, in which case I'm adamantly against, I really think it's hard to take a firm stance here, because there this question covers way too many possible scenarios.

The main question I'd ask the doctor is whether or not the child would be able to feel, as I value feeling as much as thinking. If the child turns out to be a sentient being left with a poor cognitive system, I wouldn't want to abort it.


Posted by Banora on Dec-24-2009 22:36:

The child-hater in me says 'yes' without any hesitation... but the optimist in me says "What if it turns out to be the next Kim Peek?" I'd probably still kill the brat anyway.

ETA: Unless he was like Timmy... that would be cool.


Posted by EricB. on Dec-24-2009 22:46:

Id put liquid paper in its eyes


Posted by Silky Johnson on Dec-24-2009 23:40:

That's right, MJM. I do not qualify simply being alive as quality of life.



Having just finished a health care ethics course, I'm actually very interested in issues like this...and when I get home would be glad to further engage in this conversation.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Dec-25-2009 00:56:

I would think an atheist would take this issue more severely then someone inclined to some sort of religion or afterlife. This due to the fact that an atheist recognizes that once this life is over.. thats it.. done finito. At least if you put the child out of its misery, from a religious standpoint, there is an afterlife and a positive conclusion.

I would have to think very hard about this. Keep in mind we pay taxes for healthcare and i would honestly rather spend the money towards someone who is physically challenged and cannot help it, then some welfare bum whos gonna waste his money on crack and alcohol.

I am fully for genetic testing and screening children and abortion before a certain period. But euthanasia should be at the discretion of the one to be euthanized. If i became a quadrepeligate i wouldn't want to be euthanized, i know that for sure. Fully incapacitated with only vision? Perhaps yes but i am not sure.

You hear stories about people slowly recovering from things like this and man they are happy to be alive.

There is only one life. Fuck it.. just live it as best you can.


Posted by Lira on Dec-25-2009 04:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
I would think an atheist would take this issue more severely then someone inclined to some sort of religion or afterlife. This due to the fact that an atheist recognizes that once this life is over.. thats it.. done finito. At least if you put the child out of its misery, from a religious standpoint, there is an afterlife and a positive conclusion.

I would have to think very hard about this. Keep in mind we pay taxes for healthcare and i would honestly rather spend the money towards someone who is physically challenged and cannot help it, then some welfare bum whos gonna waste his money on crack and alcohol.

I am fully for genetic testing and screening children and abortion before a certain period. But euthanasia should be at the discretion of the one to be euthanized. If i became a quadrepeligate i wouldn't want to be euthanized, i know that for sure. Fully incapacitated with only vision? Perhaps yes but i am not sure.

You hear stories about people slowly recovering from things like this and man they are happy to be alive.

There is only one life. Fuck it.. just live it as best you can.

Same here. Hey, we found something we agree on


Posted by Omega_Blue on Dec-25-2009 04:55:

i don't know what i'd do, but my one fear is having a dumb kid. followed by having a really ugly kid. lol


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Dec-25-2009 05:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Same here. Hey, we found something we agree on


didnt i already tell you i love big tits?

shame on you.


Posted by Lira on Dec-25-2009 05:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
didnt i already tell you i love big tits?

shame on you.

I don't think so. But, I'm glad to know we've got so much more in common


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Dec-25-2009 06:03:


Posted by Krypton on Dec-25-2009 06:46:

We are the only species which goes against the grain of natural selection by artificially selecting for bad genes.


Posted by LAdazeNYnights on Dec-25-2009 06:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_Blue
i don't know what i'd do, but my one fear is having a dumb kid. followed by having a really ugly kid. lol


right now my one fear is just having a kid.....


Posted by Fledz on Dec-25-2009 07:36:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
I would have the amniotic fluid tested in the early stages of labour and avoid it altogether.

Not exactly the safest procedure around.


Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.