Sampling (From A Legal Stand Point)

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Sampling (From A Legal Stand Point)
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by EddieZilker on Jun-30-2010 02:46:

quote:
Originally posted by music2dance2
?

I believe he is registering his thinking that this discussion could soon become one of the now (sometimes tacitly) prohibited, "taste great/less filling" verbal geysers featuring arguments over factually nebulous personal perspectives and preferences.

Posted by music2dance2 on Jun-30-2010 03:08:

quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
I believe he is registering his thinking that this discussion could soon become one of the now (sometimes tacitly) prohibited, "taste great/less filling" verbal geysers featuring arguments over factually nebulous personal perspectives and preferences.

lol like most then. I guess the OP can gather what he needs from all this anyway.

Posted by Nicolas Oliver on Jun-30-2010 03:27:

Thanks for the clarification Aaron

Posted by Kismet7 on Jun-30-2010 06:20:

ss t

i've heard dozens of tracks that have samples in the past year, and I doubt any of them got clearance, and there has been no legal action against them. For EDM I think the philosophy is that it would cost labels and sample owners too much money and time to make claims on the samples. The only time you might see a claim is if the track makes tons of money. given the lack of action accross the board on the average sample using track, the label or sample owner would really have to have a personal gripe against you to make noise about it in a legal forum.

Posted by Viber on Jun-30-2010 10:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Nick Cenik
Thanks for the clarification Aaron

Pages (2): « 1 [2]