TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- iPhone 5: what new can they add??
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

quote:

Originally posted by Lunar Phase 7 Obviously once projectors becomes really good, then there is scope for those to be integrated, otherwise atm, I cannot see it.

Projectors? I can't think of a single reason anyone would want it in an iphone

quote:

Originally posted by leph555 Projectors? I can't think of a single reason anyone would want it in an iphone

Sharing photos/stupid videos, games, television/movies. How cool would it be to just project that shit on a wall rather than huddle around a 4" screen?

quote:

Originally posted by Gen3r4l1ty Sharing photos/stupid videos, games, television/movies. How cool would it be to just project that shit on a wall rather than huddle around a 4" screen?

Really? I still don't see any usability in that whatsoever. I imagine the quality would be terrible and it would drain battery very quickly. I mean, even if over the years the quality/battery life improves, I still don't see people turning off the lights and finding an empty wall to project their images and videos to. Why not just message or e-mail that person the picture or video?


I still think it's a very tacky idea that Apple would never implement. I can see other companies trying it out though

.

seems straming movies would be made faster. I cant afford one, but I see enough.

quote:

Originally posted by Kinky Kelly seems straming movies would be made faster. I cant afford one, but I see enough.

Maybe you should exchange some of that crack that your father pays you with for one?

Re: Re: iPhone 5: what new can they add??

quote:

Originally posted by Acton Machine guns, that shoot people who don't have iPhones.

Those are already standard issue in the eyeballs of Iphone owners.

Something to chop the fucking fingers of those morons who'll then spend the day swiping the screen with their dicks.

taser imo...that way you can fuck up people that stare at their phones non stop during conversations.

quote:

Originally posted by nekholm This, and they could add a decent camera. 3 Mpix, what the hell? Does the camera on iPhone 4 have a flash by the way?

The more pixels you cram into a sensor the more noise is produced, especially at low light.

Tell me this; have you ever had a real need to take pictures beyond 6mp? By that I mean, being able to take your JPEG and print it at 8x10 size @ close to 300dpi? Whens the last time you printed a 4x6, which is essentially equal to about 3mp?

Why are so many of you guys so hung up on megapixel count when in reality its the very reason for having SHIT photos... like this;



I'll take even a 2 megapixel camera if it means having images like the one produced on the RIGHT of that photo.

fleshlight

3D and mind reading devices.

Girl thought translator

quote:

Originally posted by kamil Why are so many of you guys so hung up on megapixel count

Teh moar megapixelz = better quality, duh!

Ok ok, I meant a better camera, cause the camera on the 3GS is not very good (missing flash etc).

quote:

Tell me this; have you ever had a real need to take pictures beyond 6mp?

Well, no. Haven't taken any good photos. And if you only watch pictures on your computer, even 2mpix (1600x1200) is big enough.

quote:

Originally posted by kamil

is that iphone quality on the right? I've been looking at DSLR cameras lately but I'm worried they will be hard to travel with so I've been considering an iphone instead. that way I can take pictures, avoid being aware my surroundings and make barely audible phone calls with the same device.

They can always add more dickheads willing to take time off whatever these stinky peasants call 'work' and sleep on concrete for 3 days to get one.

quote:

Originally posted by phyrrus is that iphone quality on the right? I've been looking at DSLR cameras lately but I'm worried they will be hard to travel with so I've been considering an iphone instead. that way I can take pictures, avoid being aware my surroundings and make barely audible phone calls with the same device.

No, (or at least probably not) its just a random comparison I found via google.

All phones suck at taking pictures, don't even bother with any of them even the best Nokia if youre going to use it as your primary source for photography.

If you dont want the bulk of a dSLR but want something that takes photos that are acceptable in comparison to dSRL, theres really only one line of cameras that will give you those results;

Canon S series; S90, S95 and S100. The S100 being the best one of course. Take a look at some of these sample photos;

http://www.steves-digicams.com/came...photos-168.html

The real bonus with that camera is that you get some serious manual control out of a point and shoot, as well as 1080p movie recording with optical zoom (most dont have that ability). Theres a sample movie there too, the quality is fucking insane. It's my next point and shoot and will probably last me 5 years minimum (my Canon SD750 is 4 years old and looks only a year old and functions without any problems other than my dislike for the relatively poor image quality).

quote:

Originally posted by kamil No, (or at least probably not) its just a random comparison I found via google. All phones suck at taking pictures, don't even bother with any of them even the best Nokia if youre going to use it as your primary source for photography. If you dont want the bulk of a dSLR but want something that takes photos that are acceptable in comparison to dSRL, theres really only one line of cameras that will give you those results; Canon S series; S90, S95 and S100. The S100 being the best one of course. Take a look at some of these sample photos; http://www.steves-digicams.com/came...photos-168.html The real bonus with that camera is that you get some serious manual control out of a point and shoot, as well as 1080p movie recording with optical zoom (most dont have that ability). Theres a sample movie there too, the quality is fucking insane. It's my next point and shoot and will probably last me 5 years minimum (my Canon SD750 is 4 years old and looks only a year old and functions without any problems other than my dislike for the relatively poor image quality).

Canon S series are pretty good P&S cams, but if I was trying to get something close to a DSLR (without actually buying one, and hefting it around), I'd be going for G1X at the moment.

That said, I haven't used a P&S cam in ages. Spoiled, maybe.

The next phone I own needs to have:

Telepresence display
Telepresence user interface

That'd actually be good enough.

quote:

Originally posted by Sushipunk Canon S series are pretty good P&S cams, but if I was trying to get something close to a DSLR (without actually buying one, and hefting it around), I'd be going for G1X at the moment. That said, I haven't used a P&S cam in ages. Spoiled, maybe.

ever traveled with a DSLR? how much of an ass pain/liability is it? I imagine casual shots like in a restaurant or on the beach would be the most inconvenient and conspicuous thing ever.

quote:

Originally posted by phyrrus ever traveled with a DSLR? how much of an ass pain/liability is it? I imagine casual shots like in a restaurant or on the beach would be the most inconvenient and conspicuous thing ever.

It can definitely be a pain in the ass to travel with, especially since I have a couple of big-ish telephoto lenses for birdwatching, though I tend to not just wander around with them all the time since they really do stand out, lol. General walking around stuff, with just a camera and a normal lens isn't too bad though. They just go in a shoulder camera bag.

That said though, I would likely think twice about it if I was travelling to a country where I might get jumped for my shit.

quote:

Originally posted by phyrrus ever traveled with a DSLR? how much of an ass pain/liability is it? I imagine casual shots like in a restaurant or on the beach would be the most inconvenient and conspicuous thing ever.

You don't need to tell me how much of a pain in the ass it is. A couple years ago I went to Greece for a three week vacation. I had a Canon 50D with all of my lenses in my backpack; 28-70mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, 70-200mm f/4L. I went to Santorini for 3 days to scope the area and take some photographs. I spent 8+ hours every day walking around the area with my gear but the real *bitch* was a Manfrotto Tripod I had.

If you guys think that wasnt bad enough, I also went down to the old port, 580 steps;





Then again another 580 steps BACK UP.

I bet you guys are thinking.. 'youre fucking crazy AND stupid'
If I had a choice, would I do it all over again? Hell yeah, you don't get shots like this with a Point & Shoot;

quote:

Originally posted by kamil you don't get shots like this with a Point & Shoot

Exactly. I <3 my gear, heavy or not.

Nice shots, btw.

quote:

Originally posted by Sushipunk Exactly. I <3 my gear, heavy or not. Nice shots, btw.

Theyre actually panoramas. Each one is at least 10 images stitched together. I could print them at a few metres wide @ 300dpi... I've yet to find a printer that can do it that large for a reasonable price.

Re: Re: iPhone 5: what new can they add??

,

quote:

Originally posted by Acton Machine guns, that shoot people who have iPhones.

Fixed. The darn pretentious "oh look at me and my creative~emo~suave photo(ie. instagram) skills" fools.

Hmmm...
well the owner will be bulleted as well then iSuppose.. Heh.. One less apple tech hippie though amirite ?

Oh and wow , Nokia.. People still buy that ? heh and people say you can't learn anything useful on TA

...

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.