TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- Album - Superstition [Breakbeat] - Now with singles
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mad for Brad no temper here. I just thought perhaps you could of made 3 minutes of something that was more interesting and developed than the 1 hour of boring uninteresting poorly crafted work you made here. It sounds like you've been making music for about 1 month. I just don't get how you can talk rather maturely about music but then make something so poor in craftsmanship. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djsaintdog Seriously Eddie...not tryin' to knock you but, you left an extensive criticism about muy 1 minute plus intro to something I have just started (new to this shit)...New shit I'm just starting to work with...Never in my head did I think I could compete with you after reading your comment....Though you did give me some pointers much appreciated, after listening to just 5 minutes (much too long) of whatever you call this...I find it rather...dumbifying...Maybe you have classified this as breakbeat..but to me this would be something danceable if you have a group of drug addicts passing around whatever you guys do, And listen to this crap just because everybody is High and you are probably supplying whatever such group is in to. They tell you what you want to hear in order to get whatever you are supplying...Now I realize what you meant when you could'nt come up with shit like mine...Why even comment when your shit doesn't even reach my ankles? I know I will get comments from your boys who digest your shit just for great comments from you but, gimme a fuckin' break. Your shit will play in a bar around 6am...when everybody is stoned out of their minds!!!..Sorry but I have to agree with Mad for Brad on this one! Only for this post...Haven't heard any other of your posts but seriously inclining not to, after what I heard on this one...If you have anything close or upto par with my minute and a half...please feel free to PM me so I can take a listen. |
for what it is worth, I was in a bad mood and I tend to become Simon Cowell. I don't feel goos knowing what I said hurt you. I tend to assume everyone wants to be a miserable professional.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mad for Brad for what it is worth, I was in a bad mood and I tend to become Simon Cowell. I don't feel goos knowing what I said hurt you. I tend to assume everyone wants to be a miserable professional. |
Eddie, you never should be sorry for your creation - it is yours and only yours with your view and your way of expressing it - be proud and keep working/learning/improving and good thinks will happen - just believe in yourself.
Cheers form your friend.
I liked the fist 40...but after around that point I just couldn't listen on...It all sounds very similar and I suppose my ADD brain can't handle much more than 30 mins of something that sounds the same. (Or very subtley similar)
For what it is, it's cool!...An hour long track is pretty beastly work! But I think there has to be some sort of progression...logical progression that would make sense to everyone...
Some of the transition work could be looked at as well...
Some of the melodic changes like at 11:00 are hard to listen to and end up pulling me out of the music repeatadly. Might be the strong dissonance or discordant harmonies holding tension for too long...
Or I find the track being nicely set in chordally but there will be some overlying synth causing some disturbance (21:08).
Might try ever-so-slightly seating that synth into the background a bit more on the transitions. (the underlying one at say 22:40 was nice)
Guess I did listen a bit further than I thought...
Synths at 37:00 didn't quite fit for me and noted it as something that pulled me out of the song more than once.
Something like the synth at 49:45 was pleasant. If you could maybe find a better array of "cool" sounds (using it in warm/cold context) to compliment your percs / mellow style, that would benefit future tracks I think.
Paging through, best part in it's entirety was I think from 59:00 onwards. Again, good use of "cool" sounds like the piano and softer synths, rather than the warm ones. Harmonies were nice and calm rather than discordant which caused a bit of passive listening discomfort for me.
So to tl;dr : I think you' benefit most from a more concise progression to a key point or theme, something memorable otherwise it comes acrossed as meandering and without focus. I'd try to make more effective use of the dissonance for tension purposes, and try not to have it going all of the time. Some parts of that track did end up stressing me out a bit...
So there's my dolla fitty worth, good/bad ugly, basically the notes I wrote down while I listened...Hope it's useful mr. Eddie 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by theterran I liked the fist 40...but after around that point I just couldn't listen on...It all sounds very similar and I suppose my ADD brain can't handle much more than 30 mins of something that sounds the same. (Or very subtley similar) For what it is, it's cool!...An hour long track is pretty beastly work! But I think there has to be some sort of progression...logical progression that would make sense to everyone... Some of the transition work could be looked at as well... Some of the melodic changes like at 11:00 are hard to listen to and end up pulling me out of the music repeatadly. Might be the strong dissonance or discordant harmonies holding tension for too long... Or I find the track being nicely set in chordally but there will be some overlying synth causing some disturbance (21:08). Might try ever-so-slightly seating that synth into the background a bit more on the transitions. (the underlying one at say 22:40 was nice) Guess I did listen a bit further than I thought... Synths at 37:00 didn't quite fit for me and noted it as something that pulled me out of the song more than once. Something like the synth at 49:45 was pleasant. If you could maybe find a better array of "cool" sounds (using it in warm/cold context) to compliment your percs / mellow style, that would benefit future tracks I think. Paging through, best part in it's entirety was I think from 59:00 onwards. Again, good use of "cool" sounds like the piano and softer synths, rather than the warm ones. Harmonies were nice and calm rather than discordant which caused a bit of passive listening discomfort for me. So to tl;dr : I think you' benefit most from a more concise progression to a key point or theme, something memorable otherwise it comes acrossed as meandering and without focus. I'd try to make more effective use of the dissonance for tension purposes, and try not to have it going all of the time. Some parts of that track did end up stressing me out a bit... So there's my dolla fitty worth, good/bad ugly, basically the notes I wrote down while I listened...Hope it's useful mr. Eddie |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by TranceLover007 Eddie, you never should be sorry for your creation - it is yours and only yours with your view and your way of expressing it - be proud and keep working/learning/improving and good thinks will happen - just believe in yourself. Cheers form your friend. |
And this is the way it should be - well said Eddie.
Cheers
ok its late, i tried listening to it actively, but i had to stop at 16minutes in, then i skipped around after that im glad i did. up until that point though i liked it, thought it was some of ur best work. maybe ill try again tomorrow. i feel as it should change and evolve more throughout.
I wouldn't really call this breakbeat.. it's actually hard to nail in any one specific genre. Ambient, some breakbeat yes, but I would just really call this experimental chillout, or something of that nature. It's bizarre, and sounds unstructured almost. Fitting for what it is, I suppose. Personally it would drive me absolutely mental if I had to listen to the entire track for whatever reason - for one I'm biased and don't really dig this style of music to begin with, and secondly I didn't find this song even remotely memorable or appealing.
I also don't really understand why it needs to be 65 minutes.. this could have been at a healthy 5-10 minute mark, and sustained much more energy (or lack there of) and/or emotion than forcing the listener to sit through a useless repetition of essentially the same thing over and over again. Rhodes keyboards playing awkward phrases with no real melodic purpose behind a choppy beat for over an hour is useless and does nothing for the song's integrity. After 3 minutes I found myself tuning it out entirely and completely lost where it was going. Considering you seem like a man of brute honesty, I assume you would appreciate this more than anyone. I also find it quite ironic and humourous that you troll and rip on a lot of people's music here in spite of the fact that your own tracks could make a sloth yawn. But like I've said, you can't please everybody.
Happy producing!
super deep stuff, I like the bit that starts around 19 min, really airy
The mix is a problem for me, I think its waay too quiet and some of the sounds(like the kick) conflict with other sounds
other than that really creative stuff man, congrats
| quote: |
| Originally posted by heliontide I also don't really understand why it needs to be 65 minutes. |






| quote: |
| Originally posted by sako487 super deep stuff, I like the bit that starts around 19 min, really airy other than that really creative stuff man, congrats |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sako487 The mix is a problem for me, I think its waay too quiet and some of the sounds(like the kick) conflict with other sounds |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MSZ ok its late, i tried listening to it actively, but i had to stop at 16minutes in, then i skipped around after that im glad i did. up until that point though i liked it, thought it was some of ur best work. maybe ill try again tomorrow. i feel as it should change and evolve more throughout. |
Well ive been stuck at my house, absoloutley bored outa my mind ... I see your link i press play i think, this is sounding really good, but an hour long, i will probably end up turning it off after 5 mins because i'm in one of those "don't know what to do next bored" moods.
But you know what ...
I listened to the whole damn thing, and man, total respect to you, it kept me hooked for the 65 mins it was on ... I couldnt possibly comment on the technical side of things as it was "Very Pleasurable" background music ... But it certainly hit the spot, total respect to you man, for doing this..
At times it reminded me of early Chemical Brothers work, and that is No bad thing!
Thanks for sharing this man, appreciated!
Yes, I understand the whole album bit. Thanks for the epic super zoom on that one to clarify. As I said, some people go too far out of their way to ensure their trolling is paid attention to. (ie. taking the time to take all those zoom shots, uploading them onto photobucket, embedding them into your post, all to make yourself look like a smart ass) I will apologize in advance for angering the troll.
Anyhow, considering your "album" played straight through, and there were no defined breaks in the music to really give the sense of a new song starting, or any dramatic change in song structure or dynamic at all, it was essentially 65 minutes of the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over... you get the picture. But I'm not going to troll about it or get pissy pants and go on a self-righteous power trip over it. Oh, and your vocabulary or use of cute derogatory metaphors doesn't make you any more credible when rebuttling oh so graciously. You more or less make yourself look like a degenerate spending all his free time on forums ripping on people's music with a dictionary, while being thoroughly incapable of producing something of equal merit like you so zealously defend. And hell, if you're going to knock Tiesto for sitting in front of 20,000 people while doing the jesus pose or the crucifix, let me know when you have a sold out air hangar to DJ at and we'll all be sure to go so we can critique how your stage presense is in comparison. Kudos to him for whatever it is he's doing, he's done well for himself and I'm sure people would still go see him regardless of what he does on stage. Ripping on someone's stage presense doesn't do anything for your argument, or change the fact that the only thing I got from listening to your "album" was a beard.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by heliontide Yes, I understand the whole album bit. Thanks for the epic super zoom on that one to clarify. As I said, some people go too far out of their way to ensure their trolling is paid attention to. I will apologize in advance for angering the trolls. Anyhow, considering your "album" played straight through, and there were no defined breaks in the music to really give the sense of a new song starting, or any dramatic change in song structure or dynamic at all, it was essentially 65 minutes of the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over... you get the picture. But I'm not going to troll about it or get pissy pants and go on a self-righteous power trip over it. Oh, and your vocabulary or use of cute derogatory metaphors doesn't make you any more credible when rebuttling oh so graciously. You more or less make yourself look like a dork spending all his free time on forums ripping on people's music with a dictionary, while being thoroughly incapable of producing something of equal merit like you so zealously defend. And hell, if you're going to knock Tiesto for sitting in front of 20,000 people while doing the jesus pose or the crucifix, let me know when you have a sold out air hangar to DJ at and we'll all be sure to go so we can critique how your stage presense is in comparison. Kudos to him for whatever it is he's doing, he's done well for himself and I'm sure people would still go see him regardless of what he does on stage. Ripping on someone's stage presense doesn't do anything for your argument, or changes the fact that the only thing I got from listening to your "album" was a beard. |
You're right mate. This has gone too far.. I digress and apologize. Just didn't really appreciate your initial approach when you commented on my track, it was 99% slander and 1% critique. I mean, if you genuinely don't like something then all the power to ya, but the overall message was a bit over the top I thought. As we're both aspiring producers, your feedback didn't serve as a very nice welcome to this community. I didn't expect everyone to like what I had to offer obviously, but I also didn't expect to be essentially dragged through the dirt upon opening the flood gates. At least give me some warning that your corn flakes were sabotaged this morning before hand, haha.
Sall good.. I guess everyone needs to vent once in a while or what not. No harm done.
Happy producing.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by heliontide You're right mate. This has gone too far.. I digress and apologize. Just didn't really appreciate your initial approach when you commented on my track, it was 99% slander and 1% critique. I mean, if you genuinely don't like something then all the power to ya, but the overall message was a bit over the top I thought. As we're both aspiring producers, your feedback didn't serve as a very nice welcome to this community. I didn't expect everyone to like what I had to offer obviously, but I also didn't expect to be essentially dragged through the dirt upon opening the flood gates. At least give me some warning that your corn flakes were sabotaged this morning before hand, haha. Sall good.. I guess everyone needs to vent once in a while or what not. No harm done. Happy producing. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by heliontide You're right mate. This has gone too far.. I digress and apologize. Just didn't really appreciate your initial approach when you commented on my track, it was 99% slander and 1% critique. I mean, if you genuinely don't like something then all the power to ya, but the overall message was a bit over the top I thought. As we're both aspiring producers, your feedback didn't serve as a very nice welcome to this community. I didn't expect everyone to like what I had to offer obviously, but I also didn't expect to be essentially dragged through the dirt upon opening the flood gates. At least give me some warning that your corn flakes were sabotaged this morning before hand, haha. Sall good.. I guess everyone needs to vent once in a while or what not. No harm done. Happy producing. |
I got eaten alive, chewed up, threw up and then fed to hyenas xD
I've listened 3 times over the past few weeks in between the times I had a soundcard and the times I didn't. I wrote down some thoughts as I journeyed along the hour or so:
Gorgeous mood throughtout the first 10 mins. Serves well as a relaxing experience. I thought the kick was a little jumpy, but I eventually became more tolerant to it as I went along.
When I hit around 12 minutes things became a little drawn-out. Repetitive, but it could well serve as nice background stuff. I found this to be the case up until 20 mins or so when it slowly transistions.
The section arriving around 30 mins was delightful. I especially enjoyed when the vocal and absolutely fantastic build up played together around 33 mins. Definitely one of my favourite parts from the album.
During one of my listens I was playing Fallout 3. From the 40 minute mark it really seemed to suit the enviroment I was travelling through. I definitely enjoyed what I heard.
46 min - the end was the stand out section of this album IMO. The bassline made its way joyfully through the percs and that lovely sine melody, which is certainly worth a particular mention.
All in all, it served as a pleasant and interesting experience. I personally haven't heard much music similar to it, especially in terms of atmospherics. There were some passages that I wouldn't say I didn't enjoy, but did perhaps find a little too long for my tastes. Otherwise, I can honestly tell you that I have no further criticism.
Very well done, chap. It will be getting more listens from me in the future.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Owsey2008 I've listened 3 times over the past few weeks in between the times I had a soundcard and the times I didn't. I wrote down some thoughts as I journeyed along the hour or so: Gorgeous mood throughtout the first 10 mins. Serves well as a relaxing experience. I thought the kick was a little jumpy, but I eventually became more tolerant to it as I went along. When I hit around 12 minutes things became a little drawn-out. Repetitive, but it could well serve as nice background stuff. I found this to be the case up until 20 mins or so when it slowly transistions. The section arriving around 30 mins was delightful. I especially enjoyed when the vocal and absolutely fantastic build up played together around 33 mins. Definitely one of my favourite parts from the album. During one of my listens I was playing Fallout 3. From the 40 minute mark it really seemed to suit the enviroment I was travelling through. I definitely enjoyed what I heard. 46 min - the end was the stand out section of this album IMO. The bassline made its way joyfully through the percs and that lovely sine melody, which is certainly worth a particular mention. All in all, it served as a pleasant and interesting experience. I personally haven't heard much music similar to it, especially in terms of atmospherics. There were some passages that I wouldn't say I didn't enjoy, but did perhaps find a little too long for my tastes. Otherwise, I can honestly tell you that I have no further criticism. Very well done, chap. It will be getting more listens from me in the future. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by EddieZilker a learning experience requiring herculean organizational skills I didn't think myself capable of. |
I was listening to this yesterday, great stuff dude 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.