What would you do... - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- What would you do...
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by Beatflux on Nov-25-2010 01:32:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
In fairness, I prefer to not have any MP3's and if I have to it's 320.

Not being a cock about it but I honesty can hear the difference in most cases (192 vs 320 vs WAV) but then a lot of that is because by the time I burn a track to cd and mix with it, there's a fair bit of degredation going on so I like to start with wavs wherever possible.

Hard drive and server space is so cheap these days, why not?

For a label, it doesn't matter a single bit, it's not like they're not going to sign your track because they prefer 320 over 192.

It's all about that low fi grit. Get with the program, man.

Posted by Zak McKracken on Nov-26-2010 22:08:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
Given that nobody - but nobody - can consistently identify the a 320 kbps track in a 256/320 A/B test, and most people can't even hear the difference at 192 kbps

depends on the stereo-system and experience. i hear difference and it matters to me. but most people play back their music on a boomblaster anyway so the music might as well be mono; save another 50% harddrive right.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]