TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- CA doesn't want any more raves
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

quote:

Originally posted by Moongoose Excellent if it means that raves are like this again. Pick a place, hijack it for the night rave until morning than disappear into the morning sun.

its so hard to get away with this now days. especially where i live anyway.

quote:

Originally posted by shaw get ready for the "pre-recorded music" battle

that was my first thought. just make sure it's pre-recorded. problem solved.

isn't burning man in california? or is that nevada?

Re: CA doesn't want any more raves

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker The bill makes it illegal to hold an event containing more than 3 1/2 hours of pre-recorded music during the course of a night, with fines up to �$10,000 or twice the actual or estimated gross receipts for the event, whichever is greater.�

Better not let your wedding run on too long. Any concert that has music in the bar is fucked too. What about all the pop stars who lip sync? Good thing movies are only two hours these days. Just ruined a lot of kids High school proms. This is going to create a law that we get to pick and choose when to enforce. Anyways, i doubt it will pass.

Hey look everyone, Fiona Ma held a big NYE bash with a DJ playing 6 1/2 hours of prerecorded music!

http://www.actblue.com/page/encore2010?refcode=redirect



Feel free to message this obviously mentally deficient individual on FB, perhaps taking a moment to explain what massive, over-the-top hypocrisy means.

this act won't pass because raves haven't existed since the 90's.

quote:

Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay this act won't pass because raves haven't existed since the 90's.

quote:

Originally posted by WittyHandle but it's all night one offs with music by DJs, so aside from the nostalgia how is it different?

because they are not supposed to be sterile with shiny packaging.

quote:

Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay because they are not supposed to be sterile with shiny packaging.

When was the last time you went to something called a rave? Sure, clubbing is the sterile/shiny packaging deal, but I've been to plenty of parties where it's not quite so squeaky clean. You gotta find some outdoor bag, people freakin out in the fuckin dirt and shit. Of course, most of them are inside, but even so I wouldn't consider some of the places I've gone to to be very shiny.

quote:

Originally posted by chlola SF has more 'death by RAVE' than LA. Besides some of LA's politicions have vested interests in Raving. It's all about the benjamins, Baby!

I just think it's laughable that bankrupt CA can even think they can enforce something like this. There's still an active rave community up in the North Bay/Marin county area where the kids throw outdoor renegades and limited capacity ug's. Even in Modesto and the Sac area, the scenes here have started to blow up, even though most of the music is shit. Maybe the state should worry about earning more capital for their hugely bloated deficits before trying to make more things illegal. You can't fine your way out of this hole. Stupid state legislatures.

quote:

Originally posted by floyd741 When was the last time you went to something called a rave? Sure, clubbing is the sterile/shiny packaging deal, but I've been to plenty of parties where it's not quite so squeaky clean. You gotta find some outdoor bag, people freakin out in the fuckin dirt and shit. Of course, most of them are inside, but even so I wouldn't consider some of the places I've gone to to be very shiny.

biggest WOOOOOSH ever.

LOL, California.

Just stick a live acts on the bill... EDM needs more of these anyway.

quote:

Originally posted by Zharen I'm more surprised that this was sponsored from a politician from SF. They don't get much liberal than that.

Apparently they're becoming so liberal they're folding back onto themselves and coming out conservative. Or maybe they're just aging.

Meanwhile a concert goer committed suicide during the concert on Aug 21st, 2010. California should ban concerts because they promote suicidal tendencies.

But IMO how the hell can this bill be passed. "The bill makes it illegal to hold an event containing more than 3 1/2 hours of pre-recorded music during the course of a night" Please correct me if I'm wrong, but does this mean there will no longer be nightclubs or bars?

Couldn't the raves turn the music off for five minutes every three and a half hours? Then re-start it?

quote:

Originally posted by Jake Benson Apparently they're becoming so liberal they're folding back onto themselves and coming out conservative. Or maybe they're just aging. Meanwhile a concert goer committed suicide during the concert on Aug 21st, 2010. California should ban concerts because they promote suicidal tendencies. But IMO how the hell can this bill be passed. "The bill makes it illegal to hold an event containing more than 3 1/2 hours of pre-recorded music during the course of a night" Please correct me if I'm wrong, but does this mean there will no longer be nightclubs or bars?

Plus, I am completely certain that drunk people sing all the time. If you put just one of them on the bill, you have a live show. Unless the state of California would like to attempt a ruling on what is, and what isn't, a 'live performance'.

quote:

Originally posted by Jake Benson California should ban concerts because they promote suicidal tendencies.

Lol what a joke

quote:

Originally posted by WittyHandle I'd like to see the fatality stats from other music events of similar size and to what cause those deaths are attributed.

And sporting events too. How many people were arrested/injured last year after the laker's won?

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.