TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Which of these logos do you prefer?
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

man, red & black is the colors bro. If you could spruce it up and and just keep the TM I'd be forever in your debt.

quote:

Originally posted by DJChallenged DERP DERP HERP DERP DE DERP DERP HERP

Really? That's what you're going with? You made the logo into a .jpg, in turn turning the background white, degraded the quality so much it's unbearable for me to look at and pasted it into your signature?

Please god at least use this:

http://i.imgur.com/m18he.png

Copy that into the image tags and it will look like this:



And I already deleted the PSD. It was a joke in the first place but since you like it I'm forcing you to keep all the copyright symbols and shit so you realize how obnoxious it is that you insist on having that TM on your name.

quote:

Originally posted by DJRYAN� man, red & black is the colors bro. If you could spruce it up and and just keep the TM I'd be forever in your debt.

Okay, seriously, fix it before I kunt punch you.

Am I missing something with your "new" logo?

quote:

Originally posted by bas Am I missing something with your "new" logo?

Yup, probably that it looks quite different?

took a screen shot so I could get the black one. Thanks. If you have a minute, one like yours would be awesomeness. Little different, red & black color scheme. I'll pay you in inets.

quote:

Originally posted by Seandroid Yup, probably that it looks quite different?

Ah yes, the 2 pixel pink outline around the black swoop. Well done.

Really? wtf, is there something wrong with the link to the "old" one you posted?

quote:

Originally posted by bas Really? wtf, is there something wrong with the link to the "old" one you posted?

No, there's something wrong with your brain. The new one has a metallic finish, a harder stroke with a smaller outer glow, a much sharper design with harder edges, the shapes have been refined........

quote:

Originally posted by Seandroid No, there's something wrong with your brain. The new one has a metallic finish, a harder stroke with a smaller outer glow, a much sharper design with harder edges, the shapes have been refined........

...ok.

quote:

Originally posted by bas ...ok.

Is this what you're seeing? How the fuck can you not tell the difference?

ok the new one is a slightly refined version of the old one. awesome.

quote:

Originally posted by LAdazeNYnights ok the new one is a slightly refined version of the old one. awesome.

Exactly. I didn't say it was otherwise? I asked people which they liked better, the old glowier design or the new sharper design.

quote:

Originally posted by FuzzQi

I love your use of Papyrus. Such an ugly font.

quote:

Originally posted by FuzzQi

Well played.

the new one looks better, but that top-thingie looked better when it had the same width all over, like in the old one.

sharp lines are better.

I think the crescent weakens the whole thing a lot.

Maybe you should try making the arc wider and placing it across the logotype, within each individual letter, so that it's implied rather than presented as an afterthought. This would make the logotype have a unique look which makes it more than just an out of the box tech font.


My general rule of thumb in design is, if you feel that you have to use a swoosh, your logo is probably shit.

http://lekowicz.com/library/logohell/logohell.html

http://www.thestreet.com/story/986150/swoosh-there-it-is-in-fact-swooshlike-logos-are-everywhere.html

Re: Which of these logos do you prefer?

NEW LOOKS COOL

quote:

Originally posted by Seandroid I decided I wanted to refine my logo design a bit, and I needed to make it vector anyway so it was scaleable, so I figured I might as well update it. I think the new one looks sharper. BTW I know they're cheesy but it's intentional cheese because it's �ber recognizable. New Old

quote:

Originally posted by nefardec sharp lines are better. I think the crescent weakens the whole thing a lot. Maybe you should try making the arc wider and placing it across the logotype, within each individual letter, so that it's implied rather than presented as an afterthought. This would make the logotype have a unique look which makes it more than just an out of the box tech font. My general rule of thumb in design is, if you feel that you have to use a swoosh, your logo is probably shit. http://lekowicz.com/library/logohell/logohell.html http://www.thestreet.com/story/9861...everywhere.html

Lmao, it's not really a swoosh. I know how frowned upon they are Look at what it's pointing to. it starts at the A and moves on. It says both "Sean" and "Android."

Think about how the amazon logo has that arrow that goes from A to Z.

quote:

Originally posted by dj_alfi the new one looks better, but that top-thingie looked better when it had the same width all over, like in the old one.

The old one thinned out at the edge too exactly the same way. Look a little closer.

quote:

Originally posted by Seandroid Exactly. I didn't say it was otherwise? I asked people which they liked better, the old glowier design or the new sharper design.

No, you said it was quite a bit different and all but called bas blind for not being able to tell the difference. I couldn't tell much of a difference at first before I looked at it a few times either.

quote:

Originally posted by Seandroid Think about how the amazon logo has that arrow that goes from A to Z.

I know, I caught that. Ripping off logos isn't cool either.

quote:

Originally posted by nefardec I know, I caught that. Ripping off logos isn't cool either.

uh. It's not ripping off the amazon logo, it's a similar idea? First of all. Amazon's logo is an arrow, second of all it's supposed to look like a smile, thirdly my logo is COMPLETELY different, stylistically, visually and conceptually...

That's like saying getting inspiration from another track when your producing is ripping it off even if the result looks completely different. Not to mention my "swoosh" isn't even displaying the same thing, it's just going from the "a" to the rest of the word.

quote:

Originally posted by srussell0018 No, you said it was quite a bit different and all but called bas blind for not being able to tell the difference. I couldn't tell much of a difference at first before I looked at it a few times either.

Well it is pretty different if you look at it in the context I provided. It's supposed to be a new version of the logo and I wanted to know if people liked the glowier design or the metallic, sharper design. It's just like asking someone to listen to two mix downs of the same track, even though it's the same track it can still sound pretty different =]

Maybe it's because I've been graphic designing so long and I've learned to be able see subtle differences in logos, because they really do look very different to me.

Can you see the difference between these?
http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/gmail_adds_a_touch_of_make-up.php

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.