TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Gulf Coast oil spill 2.0
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jackson Source? |
Fun fact, the OP started an identical thread in the Atlanta and Southeastern US forum entitled "How more stupid can you guys be?" 
The fucked up part is how excited he sounds about it.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by VDub This might be it... Sounds about right actually according to this chart... Source... |
there's a whole lot of stupid in this thread.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tubularbills there's a whole lot of stupid in this thread. |
This is the dumbest thread I have ever read IN. MY. ENTIRE. LIFE.
How the hell does an international oil company's oil spill equate to the fault of a typical southern citizen? OMG my brain hurts just thinking about how DUMB the OP is.
The southerners caused this because, they, what? Wanted tourism to go away? To lose a massive amount of jobs? Wanted their economy to plummet? Wanted their waters to be unsafe? And I am sure you are referring to the teachers, firemen, policewomen and doctors who have spent their entire lives working on the oilworks, and thus it MUST be their fault that these things are malfunctioning?? And when there was an oil spill on the west coast, did we blame the every day person there?
I swear to fucking god I need to step away from the computer..........The amount of stupidity on TA lately is making me rage.

| quote: |
| Originally posted by yankeeBaby I swear to fucking god I need to step away from the computer..........The amount of stupidity on TA lately is making me rage. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jackson You're new to the CORe, aren't you? |
<3 <3 <3
The source for oil consumption is funny, because no one wants to be the first loser 
(aka: Who's 2nd?)
# 1 USA: 20,680,000 bbl/day
# 3 China: 7,578,000 bbl/day
# 4 Japan: 5,007,000 bbl/day
# 5 Russia: 2,858,000 bbl/day
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Spam The source for oil consumption is funny, because no one wants to be the first loser ![]() (aka: Who's 2nd?) # 1 USA: 20,680,000 bbl/day # 3 China: 7,578,000 bbl/day # 4 Japan: 5,007,000 bbl/day # 5 Russia: 2,858,000 bbl/day |
Who gives a shit? Double cheeseburgers are only 99 cents.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian point taken, however there's also this BP has operations in over 80 countries, produces around 3.8 million barrels of oil equivalent per day and has 22,400 service stations worldwide. Its largest division is BP America, which is the biggest producer of oil and gas in the United States and is headquartered in Houston, Texas. It was just funny for us to see the US blame it on being "British" when we'd not thought of it that way for so long. Like British Telecom is supposedly a company from here but it might as well be Bangalore Telecom these days. |
| quote: |
| Who gives a shit? Double cheeseburgers are only 99 cents. |
| quote: |
| Update March 20, 2011: A Coast Guard officer with a command center in Morgan City, LA, said today the Coast Guard has confirmed that oil is not coming from the Deepwater Horizon well but that they have found what appear to be smaller oil slicks in the Gulf. Their investigation into reports of large oil slicks is continuing. Additional photos and information from pilots John Wathen and Bonnie Schumaker who flew over the area yesterday are expected to be released today. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by yankeeBaby This is the dumbest thread I have ever read IN. MY. ENTIRE. LIFE. |
So tell me Kev, what would the GOP do? Are they going to hire Ann Coulter and tell us that petroleum flavored seafood is actually good for you? Are we just going to plug this leak and then continue raping the gulf for its oil? You Republicans must realize that oil is not an infinite resource, eventually it's going to run out. And with the current rate of oil consumption increasing exponentially from other countries, it's safe to assume it will run out sooner than later, but not until it becomes so scarce that we will be paying 10 dollars a gallon for it. So what's the right's solution to this? Oh yeah, cut spending on more important social services that are needed by the poor and middle class! That should show those dirty fucking hippies a thing or two.
BTW Louisiana, HOW MUCH IS THE FISH?!?!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offsho...s_in_California
| quote: |
| Despite the long-term bans on new leasing in state (since 1969) and federal waters (since 1984), drilling and production have continued on existing leases, from existing drilling and production platforms. Nine active offshore drilling and production locations remain in state waters: one platform and one artificial island in the Santa Barbara Channel, and four artificial islands and three platforms from the offshore portion of the Wilmington Oil Field in San Pedro Bay/Long Beach Harbor. The first artificial offshore island, for Belmont Offshore Field, was removed in 1999.[23] Twenty-three offshore drilling and production platforms remain in federal waters, producing 24,000,000 barrels (3,800,000 m3) of oil |
Some progress is better than no progress
| quote: |
| California, like other states, owns and controls the mineral resources within 3 nautical miles (6 km) of the coast. Leasing California state seabed is controlled by the California State Lands Commission, which halted further leasing of state offshore tracts after the Santa Barbara oil spill in 1969.[12] In 1994 the California legislature codified the ban on new leases by passing the California Coastal Sanctuary Act, which prohibited new leasing of state offshore tracts. The federal government continued to hold offshore lease sales through 1984. Then the US Congress directed that no federal funds be used to lease additional federal tracts off the coast of California. Congress repeated the moratorium on new leases every year until September 2008, when an appropriations bill passed the House and Senate without the ban; however, no federal lease sales have been proposed for offshore California since the ban was lifted. A lawsuit by the state of California prevented the federal government from allowing development on 36 federal leases issued before the congressional moratorium. The federal government voided 29 of the contested leases by repaying $1.1 million in lease bonuses; the seven additional federal leases have not been resolved, but remain inactive because of the litigation. The Minerals Management Service estimates that the seven undeveloped leases contain 1,000,000,000 barrels (0.16 km3) of recoverable oil and 500,000,000,000 cubic feet (14 km3) of recoverable gas.[13] In 1990, President George H. W. Bush issued an executive moratorium banning new federal leasing through the year 2000 in many offshore areas, including California. In 1998, President Bill Clinton extended the moratorium through 2012. In July 2008, President George W. Bush rescinded the executive order. |
| quote: |
| Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Monday withdrew his support for a plan he championed to allow new offshore oil drilling off Santa Barbara County, citing the disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Schwarzenegger, whose administration as recently as Friday defended the proposed Tranquillon Ridge offshore drilling project, said images of the spill in the gulf changed his mind. "All of you have seen, when you turn on the television, the devastation in the gulf, and I'm sure that they also were assured that it was safe to drill," he said at a news conference Monday. "I see on TV the birds drenched in oil, the fishermen out of work, the massive oil spill and oil slick destroying our precious ecosystem. That will not happen here in California, and this is why I am withdrawing my support for the T-Ridge project." |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zharen So tell me Kev, what would the GOP do? Are they going to hire Ann Coulter and tell us that petroleum flavored seafood is actually good for you? Are we just going to plug this leak and then continue raping the gulf for its oil? You Republicans must realize that oil is not an infinite resource, eventually it's going to run out. And with the current rate of oil consumption increasing exponentially from other countries, it's safe to assume it will run out sooner than later, but not until it becomes so scarce that we will be paying 10 dollars a gallon for it. So what's the right's solution to this? Oh yeah, cut spending on more important social services that are needed by the poor and middle class! That should show those dirty fucking hippies a thing or two. BTW Louisiana, HOW MUCH IS THE FISH?!?! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zharen The offshore rigs you are referring too have been around since the 50' and 60's, at a time where many believed offshore oil drilling was a good thing. I'm sure that once the South reduces the gulf into a cesspool of filthy black mush, CA will close down the rest of these as well. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Sushipunk LOL THOSE STUPID HICK CALIFORNIANS LOL |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by The17sss You're right. We don't spend enough on entitlements- social welfare now makes up "only" 35% of all U.S. wages; all those "poor" people with 40 inch flat screens, cars, and $100 Nike shoes living in government subsidized housing need just a liiiiittle more. Spending $1.6 trillion over budget this year is the path to sustainability. And we'll dump oil and run a $15 trillion economy on magic solar beans and windmills. |

Ugh, every time you post in this thread, you're making yourself look more and more stupid.
Do you honestly not see how massively poor your reasoning is on this?
Why? Because I want to hold the South accountable for polluting the South? LOL okay...
Like I said before, I considered the first leak an accident of massive proportions. But to have a second one not even a year afterward, well there just seems to be some buffoonry at work here.
....
We should respect your opinion.
But our collective opinion of you is that you're severely retarded.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.