TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Sasha is now using Traktor!!!
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
dont you see the ironi in rodri santos post? i doubt he mean that rofl. infact i think he is saying the opposite.
Who cares? I like traktor..
As long as Sasha plays good music..
Everyone's a dj these days.. get over it.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by amdmaxx Who cares? I like traktor.. As long as Sasha plays good music.. |
So who wants to go back 5 or more years and drag out all the posts from people saying how using CDJs isn't real DJing because it's too easy and only DJing with vinyl is real?
but we all know those people were idiots. 
Of course, but it still doesn't stop them.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Fledz So who wants to go back 5 or more years and drag out all the posts from people saying how using CDJs isn't real DJing because it's too easy and only DJing with vinyl is real? |
Here you go lads, 28 years ago.
"For the people that don't know what a turntable is"
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rodri Santos This is ridiculous, using traktor to mix is not real djing, |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by n3lly Here you go lads, 28 years ago. "For the people that don't know what a turntable is" |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Apeattack Dang... thank goodness I am living in 2011. There is no way I would pick up DJing if I had to deal with all that. |
i love mostly how he made the phasor effect.
like Sasha really needs to prove he can DJ on turntables or CDJs. the guy has been DJing since the 90s.
Back in the days of good ol� wholesome vinyl Sasha was one of the most clinical mixers out there.
The whole crux of the issue is this... many people still associate the ability of a DJ to be his skill in matching the tempo of two tunes to one another in order to keep the music flowing. This is still the perception of many bedroom DJs today. The reality is that this was really only ever a factor in the late 80s early 90s when this was truly revered and looked up to. But as things progressed it�s mainly your entry point DJs who took this as an important thing because this was what they were currently learning. Because it is a skill that takes some time to become proficient in and longer to actually genuinely master there is a generation that carries resentment to anything that basically throws the time they took to master this out of the window. I personally felt this for some time but realised I needed to get over this stigma in order to progress.
I needed to accept that it�s my DJ experience that makes me the DJ that I am not the method I use to match beats. There is so much more, i.e. your ability to read the crowd, to program a set, things that can�t be taught to anyone that is in the home environment.
I used to believe that things like Traktor have lowered the standards of DJs but in actual fact it�s fair to say that it has actually raised it. At least now, when you are out in a club you are less likely to hear that train wreck mix alongside piss poor track selection. Granted, it makes talentless people sound a bit better than they really are, but then let�s face it, who was the last awesome DJ to make it big without a good production to their name?
One of the gigs that I play monthly, a mate of mine sets up his laptop and as it�s just us we don�t bother switching to mine, so my whole set up involves taking headphones and a memory stick with me. The dancefloor doesn�t care what we mix on, they just want to hear a well engineered set with good progression and some filthy tracks that make them feel good at the end of the night. It�s a popular night that keeps growing and people are coming for the music.
I actually heard some girls comparing us to one of the other nights there and they said they preferred ours as the overall vibe was better and the flow of the music was really good. The other guys use mainly CDs and vinyl, (now their skills aren�t great but they are good guys so I hold them no grudges), but what was interesting is that they actually mentioned our use of laptop as a plus rather than a negative. Now you and I both know that in reality it is harder to spin with proper Decks than a latop for sure, but the reality is that perceptions are changing and people are making the connection between DJs and laptops as being a natural progression. For the record my friend (Ago) and I have about 50 years of DJing in the club circuit between us so that will make a difference.
Another thing to consider is that some of the greatest DJs of all time didn�t even mix records; they just lived and died by their track selection. Selection is EVERYTHING, beat matching is a technical point.
This doesn�t mean I don�t appreciate DJs who can really rock with vinyl, I genuinely wish this is still where it was at as I really enjoyed this time in the industry, but if you can�t beat them with your game, beat them at their game.
Cheers
Nem
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nemesis44 Back in the days of good ol� wholesome vinyl Sasha was one of the most clinical mixers out there. The whole crux of the issue is this... many people still associate the ability of a DJ to be his skill in matching the tempo of two tunes to one another in order to keep the music flowing. This is still the perception of many bedroom DJs today. The reality is that this was really only ever a factor in the late 80s early 90s when this was truly revered and looked up to. But as things progressed it�s mainly your entry point DJs who took this as an important thing because this was what they were currently learning. Because it is a skill that takes some time to become proficient in and longer to actually genuinely master there is a generation that carries resentment to anything that basically throws the time they took to master this out of the window. I personally felt this for some time but realised I needed to get over this stigma in order to progress. I needed to accept that it�s my DJ experience that makes me the DJ that I am not the method I use to match beats. There is so much more, i.e. your ability to read the crowd, to program a set, things that can�t be taught to anyone that is in the home environment. I used to believe that things like Traktor have lowered the standards of DJs but in actual fact it�s fair to say that it has actually raised it. At least now, when you are out in a club you are less likely to hear that train wreck mix alongside piss poor track selection. Granted, it makes talentless people sound a bit better than they really are, but then let�s face it, who was the last awesome DJ to make it big without a good production to their name? One of the gigs that I play monthly, a mate of mine sets up his laptop and as it�s just us we don�t bother switching to mine, so my whole set up involves taking headphones and a memory stick with me. The dancefloor doesn�t care what we mix on, they just want to hear a well engineered set with good progression and some filthy tracks that make them feel good at the end of the night. It�s a popular night that keeps growing and people are coming for the music. I actually heard some girls comparing us to one of the other nights there and they said they preferred ours as the overall vibe was better and the flow of the music was really good. The other guys use mainly CDs and vinyl, (now their skills aren�t great but they are good guys so I hold them no grudges), but what was interesting is that they actually mentioned our use of laptop as a plus rather than a negative. Now you and I both know that in reality it is harder to spin with proper Decks than a latop for sure, but the reality is that perceptions are changing and people are making the connection between DJs and laptops as being a natural progression. For the record my friend (Ago) and I have about 50 years of DJing in the club circuit between us so that will make a difference. Another thing to consider is that some of the greatest DJs of all time didn�t even mix records; they just lived and died by their track selection. Selection is EVERYTHING, beat matching is a technical point. This doesn�t mean I don�t appreciate DJs who can really rock with vinyl, I genuinely wish this is still where it was at as I really enjoyed this time in the industry, but if you can�t beat them with your game, beat them at their game. Cheers Nem |
After DJ'ing for 6+ years or so I do hold a respect for those that know how to mix on anything. I spent my time learning vinyl even as it was going out of favor, and am a little bit proud to still be able to rock my 1200's.
But after this amount of time you have to come the reality that the real work isn't even when you are spinning live. The real work is spent digging for tunes, developing your style, and learning the tracks you buy inside and out.
Playing out is just the fun part! Anyone can hit the sync button, but it takes years to learn how to put together a proper set.
And I doubt Sasha is even using the sync button. He can beatmatch in seconds, and probably is using the CDJ-2000's to control the software, the X1's for loops and effect and filters. The CDJ-2000's are like the most expensive controllers ever, but I love them!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by A.B As I mentioned previously, people state that using Traktor etc is "the way forward" Where exactly is "forward" in the grand scheme of things exactly? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nemesis44 Back in the days of good ol� wholesome vinyl Sasha was one of the most clinical mixers out there. The whole crux of the issue is this... many people still associate the ability of a DJ to be his skill in matching the tempo of two tunes to one another in order to keep the music flowing. This is still the perception of many bedroom DJs today. The reality is that this was really only ever a factor in the late 80s early 90s when this was truly revered and looked up to. But as things progressed it�s mainly your entry point DJs who took this as an important thing because this was what they were currently learning. Because it is a skill that takes some time to become proficient in and longer to actually genuinely master there is a generation that carries resentment to anything that basically throws the time they took to master this out of the window. I personally felt this for some time but realised I needed to get over this stigma in order to progress. I needed to accept that it�s my DJ experience that makes me the DJ that I am not the method I use to match beats. There is so much more, i.e. your ability to read the crowd, to program a set, things that can�t be taught to anyone that is in the home environment. I used to believe that things like Traktor have lowered the standards of DJs but in actual fact it�s fair to say that it has actually raised it. At least now, when you are out in a club you are less likely to hear that train wreck mix alongside piss poor track selection. Granted, it makes talentless people sound a bit better than they really are, but then let�s face it, who was the last awesome DJ to make it big without a good production to their name? One of the gigs that I play monthly, a mate of mine sets up his laptop and as it�s just us we don�t bother switching to mine, so my whole set up involves taking headphones and a memory stick with me. The dancefloor doesn�t care what we mix on, they just want to hear a well engineered set with good progression and some filthy tracks that make them feel good at the end of the night. It�s a popular night that keeps growing and people are coming for the music. I actually heard some girls comparing us to one of the other nights there and they said they preferred ours as the overall vibe was better and the flow of the music was really good. The other guys use mainly CDs and vinyl, (now their skills aren�t great but they are good guys so I hold them no grudges), but what was interesting is that they actually mentioned our use of laptop as a plus rather than a negative. Now you and I both know that in reality it is harder to spin with proper Decks than a latop for sure, but the reality is that perceptions are changing and people are making the connection between DJs and laptops as being a natural progression. For the record my friend (Ago) and I have about 50 years of DJing in the club circuit between us so that will make a difference. Another thing to consider is that some of the greatest DJs of all time didn�t even mix records; they just lived and died by their track selection. Selection is EVERYTHING, beat matching is a technical point. This doesn�t mean I don�t appreciate DJs who can really rock with vinyl, I genuinely wish this is still where it was at as I really enjoyed this time in the industry, but if you can�t beat them with your game, beat them at their game. Cheers Nem |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by A.B Personally I see this as a superficial perception on the part of the clubber. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Fledz Nem, I may just save this post and quote it on multiple forums every time this discussion comes up |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nemesis44 Back in the days of good ol� wholesome vinyl Sasha was one of the most clinical mixers out there. The whole crux of the issue is this... many people still associate the ability of a DJ to be his skill in matching the tempo of two tunes to one another in order to keep the music flowing. This is still the perception of many bedroom DJs today. The reality is that this was really only ever a factor in the late 80s early 90s when this was truly revered and looked up to. But as things progressed it�s mainly your entry point DJs who took this as an important thing because this was what they were currently learning. Because it is a skill that takes some time to become proficient in and longer to actually genuinely master there is a generation that carries resentment to anything that basically throws the time they took to master this out of the window. I personally felt this for some time but realised I needed to get over this stigma in order to progress. I needed to accept that it�s my DJ experience that makes me the DJ that I am not the method I use to match beats. There is so much more, i.e. your ability to read the crowd, to program a set, things that can�t be taught to anyone that is in the home environment. I used to believe that things like Traktor have lowered the standards of DJs but in actual fact it�s fair to say that it has actually raised it. At least now, when you are out in a club you are less likely to hear that train wreck mix alongside piss poor track selection. Granted, it makes talentless people sound a bit better than they really are, but then let�s face it, who was the last awesome DJ to make it big without a good production to their name? One of the gigs that I play monthly, a mate of mine sets up his laptop and as it�s just us we don�t bother switching to mine, so my whole set up involves taking headphones and a memory stick with me. The dancefloor doesn�t care what we mix on, they just want to hear a well engineered set with good progression and some filthy tracks that make them feel good at the end of the night. It�s a popular night that keeps growing and people are coming for the music. I actually heard some girls comparing us to one of the other nights there and they said they preferred ours as the overall vibe was better and the flow of the music was really good. The other guys use mainly CDs and vinyl, (now their skills aren�t great but they are good guys so I hold them no grudges), but what was interesting is that they actually mentioned our use of laptop as a plus rather than a negative. Now you and I both know that in reality it is harder to spin with proper Decks than a latop for sure, but the reality is that perceptions are changing and people are making the connection between DJs and laptops as being a natural progression. For the record my friend (Ago) and I have about 50 years of DJing in the club circuit between us so that will make a difference. Another thing to consider is that some of the greatest DJs of all time didn�t even mix records; they just lived and died by their track selection. Selection is EVERYTHING, beat matching is a technical point. This doesn�t mean I don�t appreciate DJs who can really rock with vinyl, I genuinely wish this is still where it was at as I really enjoyed this time in the industry, but if you can�t beat them with your game, beat them at their game. Cheers Nem |
The one thing I don't understand about the industry right now is the love of CDJs. They're dumb, and they've always been dumb (obviously they're good gear from a technical standpoint, I simply mean in concept). It should have gone from vinyl straight to mp3s, but instead we have this middle stage with CDJs.
It's funny how I've been told by some DJs I should "learn CDJs, cause midi controllers and laptops are lame". To me it seems ridiculous to buy something to play a dying medium. Vinyl will always be respected and unique, because it actually SOUNDS different, but CDJs play the same digital tracks in a more cumbersome way.
Who knows, maybe it's just because the first time I started DJing was back in the latter vinyl days (02-03), and then I gave it up and have been getting into it again recently with a midi controller + laptop. Burning a bunch of CDs just seems silly.
(I know the new ones have USB inputs, and they'd probably be great to use as controllers, but I don't see why you'd look down on a midi controller, but respect the use of CDJs as mp3 controllers)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Quazar The one thing I don't understand about the industry right now is the love of CDJs. They're dumb, and they've always been dumb (obviously they're good gear from a technical standpoint, I simply mean in concept). It should have gone from vinyl straight to mp3s, but instead we have this middle stage with CDJs. It's funny how I've been told by some DJs I should "learn CDJs, cause midi controllers and laptops are lame". To me it seems ridiculous to buy something to play a dying medium. Vinyl will always be respected and unique, because it actually SOUNDS different, but CDJs play the same digital tracks in a more cumbersome way. Who knows, maybe it's just because the first time I started DJing was back in the latter vinyl days (02-03), and then I gave it up and have been getting into it again recently with a midi controller + laptop. Burning a bunch of CDs just seems silly. (I know the new ones have USB inputs, and they'd probably be great to use as controllers, but I don't see why you'd look down on a midi controller, but respect the use of CDJs as mp3 controllers) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Quazar It's funny how I've been told by some DJs I should "learn CDJs, cause midi controllers and laptops are lame". T |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.