Tech Trance - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Tech Trance
Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Posted by TranceSeeker on Aug-14-2002 10:43:

I think the best example of tech trance is:

Katana - gemini

Posted by j�c� on Jan-16-2003 07:13:

quote:
Originally posted by TranceSeeker
I think the best example of tech trance is:

Katana - gemini

Katana = Tech Trance

Posted by Slapskin on Jan-16-2003 07:18:

everything by thomas penton

Posted by noikeee on Jan-16-2003 13:51:

katana should get recognized as one of the trance biggest names.. I mean they got so many top tracks out.. they're making more for the scene than, let's say, armin (in terms of production only, dj'ing is a completely different story).

i love their new style (dulce vita, alesis) but i think they should make some new tunes in old style (gemini, fancy fair).. those own.

Posted by Ste on Jan-16-2003 14:38:

quote:
Originally posted by TranceSeeker
These are not tech trance tune !!

Marco V. is the tech trance master

exactly!

for tech trance try:

DJ d-light feat climax69 - massanfertigung
igor s - boomerang
marco v - echoes (marco v.ision mix)
ricky le roy - one day (big bass mix)
innergy - welcome asteroid
marcos - time (future mix) (present mix is more trancier and also good)

Posted by mos man on Jan-16-2003 16:20:

Mea Culpa - Don't Say [Divide & Rule Mix]

Boca - Miami [Biscayne Mix]

Frank Brook - Daywalker

i need say no more..

you could also get Marco V Live @ Club Eau (24-11-01) for an incredible set, actually my favourite ever

Posted by Ste on Jan-16-2003 16:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Shudder
who really cares. good music is good music

i really care because i like tech trance way more than prog trance, and if sum1 recommended a tune on got them confused id be annoyed after downloading a tune i wudnt like.

Posted by speedracer_mec on Jan-16-2003 17:26:

amoeba assasin/andy gray

Posted by Ste on Jan-16-2003 17:32:

quote:
Originally posted by speedracer_mec
amoeba assasin/andy gray

see this is when definations get confused

Pages (2): « 1 [2]