TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- those Hoops girls wear around their head....
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »


Posted by Fledz on Jun-16-2011 07:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Happymess
I think it rocks. But then again I don't look at her the way you do.
Furthermore, I'm just imagining it on myself. I think it would look really cool.

Girls look at hairstyles and go "Oh wow, that is awesome!".
Like the fringe (Cleopatra style, not the side swept one).
It doesn't. It's shit and it makes women look less attractive, just like that thing above.


Posted by knowhope on Jun-16-2011 08:30:

If you have no interest on a girl, because she has a hoop on her head, it's your loss.

But if you don't like the reason why she's wearing one, then i guess some people are just angry or comedians.

Either way, a hoop wont stop me from getting some.


Posted by nefardec on Jun-16-2011 14:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Girls look at hairstyles and go "Oh wow, that is awesome!".
Like the fringe (Cleopatra style, not the side swept one).
It doesn't. It's shit and it makes women look less attractive, just like that thing above.


right, because women have to be attractive to men to have a fulfilled existence in 2011.


that said i am really sick of the partial shaved head thing. it was cool when i saw it like once a week. but now it's like every 5 people i see in brooklyn. it's not a question of being attractive, but i generally don't get along with late adopter trend whores


Posted by srussell0018 on Jun-16-2011 14:30:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
right, because women have to be attractive to men to have a fulfilled existence in 2011.


Somewhat true. Maybe not a fulfilled existence personally, but definitely socially.


Posted by nefardec on Jun-16-2011 14:37:

quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
Somewhat true. Maybe not a fulfilled existence personally, but definitely socially.


well i know it's true, but it's rather unfortunate don't you think?

i don't think there is anything wrong with admiring beauty - but the problem is society (male dominated still, mind you) has too narrow views (often unhealthy) about what is beautiful, and also beauty is often seen as a possession or commodity.


Posted by srussell0018 on Jun-16-2011 14:40:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
well i know it's true, but it's rather unfortunate don't you think?

i don't think there is anything wrong with admiring beauty - but the problem is society (male dominated still, mind you) has too narrow views (often unhealthy) about what is beautiful, and also beauty is often seen as a possession or commodity.


Yeah it is unfortunate, but I also don't think the average male's views about what is beautiful is the same as the media, i.e. borderline malnourished-looking skinny girls.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean about beauty being seen as a possession or commodity.


Posted by Marcus Summers on Jun-16-2011 14:58:

Re: those Hoops girls wear around their head....

quote:
Originally posted by Scoops
WTF...been seeing this in the clubs and bars abit too much lately this summer


this has to be the most retarded trend going on rite now....

why girls wear this around their head is beynd me


You are making me fear coming back to NJ this summer, my friend.

Do you go to bar a often?


Posted by Scoops on Jun-16-2011 15:13:

Re: Re: those Hoops girls wear around their head....

quote:
Originally posted by Marcus Summers
You are making me fear coming back to NJ this summer, my friend.

Do you go to bar a often?


fuck no....can't stand Bar A...

the only thing worth seeing at Bar A in Monica behind the bar


Posted by nefardec on Jun-16-2011 15:21:

quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
Yeah it is unfortunate, but I also don't think the average male's views about what is beautiful is the same as the media, i.e. borderline malnourished-looking skinny girls.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean about beauty being seen as a possession or commodity.


well, you can 'buy' beauty (better said, hotness) packaged as breast implants, waxing strips, 'skinny' pepsi cans, etc, etc. in other words, beauty is the product that all of these various things are selling, and people are buying into it more than ever. this is a relatively recent cultural phenomenon that i think really started with advertising in the 1960s.


Posted by srussell0018 on Jun-16-2011 15:30:

That's just how people work though. Actually, that's how all animals work. More attractive things are more desirable. Marketing companies would be fools not to capitalize on that.

Also, I don't think it's anything new. Here's an add from the 1920s


She may not be considered "hot" by today's standards, but I'm sure she was back then.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jun-16-2011 15:36:

Retro is not a recent trend. Fads have always come and gone and cropped up again some time later.


Posted by Fledz on Jun-16-2011 15:36:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
right, because women have to be attractive to men to have a fulfilled existence in 2011.

At a barebones biological level (assuming they are straight and looking)? Of course they do. Works in reverse too.
How are you supposed to compete with others and attract a mate if your attractiveness is diminished?

You can preach about self empowerment, confidence, self-belief and so on all you want, but more often than not an initial attraction is based on looks.

How is this any different to a woman telling me I look better clean shaven than with a beard? It isn't. It's exactly the same.
If all of a sudden there was a sudden craze for all men to grow a Hitler moustache because they all thought it made them look better, but in fact made them less attractive to women, would you then comment that men shouldn't care because they don't need to be attractive to women to have a fulfilled existence in 2011? I see a lot of double standards here.

Point is - I don't like "Cleopatra" fringes, most men that I've spoken to don't, we generally agree that it makes women less attractive, women seem to think differently, so it's only right for us to point it out in an effort for women to be hotter. I see nothing wrong with that.


Posted by nefardec on Jun-16-2011 15:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
At a barebones biological level (assuming they are straight and looking)? Of course they do. Works in reverse too.
How are you supposed to compete with others and attract a mate if your attractiveness is diminished?


you missed the entire point of my post.

obviously attractiveness is key in this way.


but beauty is more standardized around the world than ever, and the standard is often unrealistic and unhealthy.

quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
That's just how people work though. Actually, that's how all animals work. More attractive things are more desirable. Marketing companies would be fools not to capitalize on that.


fyi i'm a designer and i've worked in advertising, and my dad was an ad-man. i'm no stranger to this conversation

what's the use in talking about what should be important for companies? obviously $$ is the only thing that will ever be important for businesses. rather, I'm more interested in talking about what our collective cultural (and more importantly, individual) dreams could be. i think there is an ethical question here that just doesnt matter anymore.


Posted by Fledz on Jun-16-2011 15:43:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
you missed the entire point of my post.

obviously attractiveness is key in this way.


but beauty is more standardized around the world than ever, and the standard is often unrealistic and unhealthy.

Man, that conversation could go in any number of directions if we want to be that general.

We're obviously talking about different points, but it's 2am and you're drawing me away from my horribly boring and analytical 50 page marketing research report, due tomorrow. Bastard


Posted by EarnYourKeep on Jun-16-2011 15:57:

i think those hoops or bands are damn sexy...

presenting Ashley B via Salt Lake City - ski superpipe womens jr


Posted by srussell0018 on Jun-16-2011 16:01:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
rather, I'm more interested in talking about what our collective cultural (and more importantly, individual) dreams could be. i think there is an ethical question here that just doesnt matter anymore.


I understand that, I just don't think it's as big of an issue as you describe. If you're supposing that all men hold the same standard of beauty as fashion magazines, you're incorrect. If all men only wanted perfect 10s, and they never settled for anything less than supermodels, there would be a world full of single men. Sure, they might think that's desirable, but it's not as if it is the only thing they'll accept.

Tons of guys prefer attractive girls with personalities other than attractive girls with no humor/intellect/etc. Many different men also have many different types. Some guys like "thick" girls, some guys like thin girls, some guys like blondes, brunettes, red heads, etc. I don't think there's this universal standard of attractiveness that you're assuming. There may definitely be one in magazines and commercials, and the women in those commercials may very well be seen as unbelievably attractive and desirable to most men, but that doesn't mean that they're the "standard" for beauty.

I think you're painting men with a more superficial brush than is accurate.

Also, there's nothing ethically wrong with wanting an attractive mate. That's just human nature.


Posted by VDub on Jun-16-2011 16:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Zharen
Just another recycled fad cuz no one can come up with anything new. Retro is the new black.


Agreed...

From fashion to music to movies...

Remakes of everything...

We're doomed...


Posted by Happymess on Jun-16-2011 16:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Girls look at hairstyles and go "Oh wow, that is awesome!".
Like the fringe (Cleopatra style, not the side swept one).
It doesn't. It's shit and it makes women look less attractive, just like that thing above.

Did you mean to quote me?

If you think I'd sport that hairstyle in an effort to attract the opposite sex, you are sorely mistaken. I'd only ever do something with my hair If *I* deem it attractive and suitable.
I've had the same hairstyle for a decade. I'm not very adventurous with it. But if I see something cool I may try it for the day.

Beauty is relative.


Posted by Fledz on Jun-16-2011 16:14:

I quoted you because the conversation lead from your post as well as others. It wasn't directed at you individually though, no.


Posted by srussell0018 on Jun-16-2011 16:15:

It's funny when very attractive people say that beauty is "relative." It's quite easy to not care about how the opposite sex perceives your level of attractiveness when you already know that almost all of them find you attractive.


Posted by Fledz on Jun-16-2011 16:16:

quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
I understand that, I just don't think it's as big of an issue as you describe. If you're supposing that all men hold the same standard of beauty as fashion magazines, you're incorrect. If all men only wanted perfect 10s, and they never settled for anything less than supermodels, there would be a world full of single men. Sure, they might think that's desirable, but it's not as if it is the only thing they'll accept.

Tons of guys prefer attractive girls with personalities other than attractive girls with no humor/intellect/etc. Many different men also have many different types. Some guys like "thick" girls, some guys like thin girls, some guys like blondes, brunettes, red heads, etc. I don't think there's this universal standard of attractiveness that you're assuming. There may definitely be one in magazines and commercials, and the women in those commercials may very well be seen as unbelievably attractive and desirable to most men, but that doesn't mean that they're the "standard" for beauty.

I think you're painting men with a more superficial brush than is accurate.

Also, there's nothing ethically wrong with wanting an attractive mate. That's just human nature.

I would hazard to say that a lot of the airbrushed and stick figure "beauties" in magazines are driven more by what women perceive to be perfection, rather than men. A point so conveniently always skipped over.


Posted by srussell0018 on Jun-16-2011 16:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
I would hazard to say that a lot of the airbrushed and stick figure "beauties" in magazines are driven more by what women perceive to be perfection, rather than men. A point so conveniently always skipped over.


That's true. Or what women perceive to be what men perceive to be attractive, etc. It's very very rare that I find a runway model to be especially attractive. I think that look is gross.


Posted by Happymess on Jun-16-2011 16:34:

quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
It's funny when very attractive people say that beauty is "relative." It's quite easy to not care about how the opposite sex perceives your level of attractiveness when you already know that almost all of them find you attractive.

Well that's very kind of you but I don't consider myself "very attractive". I just don't care, I don't follow trends, much less take into account what other people think of a certain look/hairstyle, which is very convenient cause I get to do whhat I want.


Posted by srussell0018 on Jun-16-2011 16:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Happymess
Well that's very kind of you but I don't consider myself "very attractive". I just don't care, I don't follow trends, much less take into account what other people think of a certain look/hairstyle, which is very convenient cause I get to do whhat I want.


Who said I was talking about you?









Call me


Posted by Happymess on Jun-16-2011 16:39:

quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
Who said I was talking about you?









Call me

Because I was the one who said "Beauty is relative".







I'm never gonna call you.


Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.