TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Cool outboard FX
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by tehlord on Mar-15-2013 10:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
A what ?

I'm sorry if i upset you. I just wish you would be smarter with your buys.


How on earth can you hurt my feelings? This is the internet. The only way you could hurt my feelings is by telling me you were dying or something because you know I have a soft spot for you.

As for my purchases, you seem to forget that I was buying, using and gigging with hardware when you were still playing with lego (you know, the first time round). I still have hardware now, combined with an extremely extensive software setup. I'm more than aware of the pro's and con's of each, and actually want to own more hardware. I like it and I enjoy it. Your borderline vulcan need to be logical and practical has no relevance on my decisions. And as a side note, I have enough money in the bank to buy pretty much whatever I want this side of a full size SSL or Neve desk, but I obviously don't need that. I actually enjoy the process as much as the result.

Oh and Dave, nice


Posted by Richard Butler on Mar-15-2013 11:19:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool outboard FX

quote:
Originally posted by cryophonik


A live engineer friend of mine had a Yamaha multi-FX unit back in the day that he swore by (and got incredible live FX with), and I think it may have been the same one that Richard recommended.


The one I had was slightly older model than the one in my link, but I cou;dn't find an image / model details anywhere, but I suspect the one linked to would be similar.

On things like vocals that unit I had was just unbeatable - this was some time back when I had lots of hardware and made totally different musak.

I broke it in the end.
The way it thickens things is like no other FX I've ever used.

It was a lot easier to use than the late 90's Roland / Boss multi fx units.


Posted by cryophonik on Mar-16-2013 04:52:

quote:
Originally posted by tehlord
Oh and Dave, nice




Now I'm in the market for a 1/2-rack compressor to mate with my SSL. Or, I might sell the Drawmer and get a small-ish (e.g., 6U) lunchbox and fill it with some 500-series toys, but that's a slippery slope, for sure.


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 08:03:

Not my pic, but my X-panda is on it's way to join my x-desk
Also chasing a Lexicon MX400XL to patch on send 1&2


Posted by Juan Paulino on Mar-16-2013 08:08:

Hey Raph, are you going to upgrade your D/A to the benchmark Dac 2


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 08:18:

No, AD <> DA is SSL alphalink madiAX


Posted by Juan Paulino on Mar-16-2013 08:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
No, AD <> DA is SSL alphalink madiAX


Oh cool.


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 08:57:

quote:
Originally posted by Juan Paulino
Oh cool.


SSL all the way baby if you click on my website and then on the picture, you get my current gearlist


Posted by Juan Paulino on Mar-16-2013 08:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
SSL all the way baby if you click on my website and then on the picture, you get my current gearlist


How does it sound?


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 09:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Juan Paulino
How does it sound?
really neutral, with nice saturation when clipping the ADC's had a long DAC journey, from dedicated stereo, benchmark, TCElectronic etc.
But the Alphalink sounds most neutral and open IMHO, the benchmark had a little hifi dip around 200hz, the TC was bright, but not open, for me this is exactly right.


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 09:07:

The other slutty thing i bought is an Innerclock SyncGen II Pro, to tame my TT-303, Tempest and all other units that can sync to midi clock
Just learned my Cirklon comes in may and that's it then
DAW less mixing via Cirklon and Genome and all the synths onboard goodies
Mixed on SSL with Lexicon on the send/returns
No AD<>DA conversion during mixdown, analogue all the way. (It's an irrational fetish. I know, but to my ears, it just sounds better)


Posted by Juan Paulino on Mar-16-2013 09:22:

Damn


Posted by tehlord on Mar-16-2013 12:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
Not my pic, but my X-panda is on it's way to join my x-desk
Also chasing a Lexicon MX400XL to patch on send 1&2




Did you not thing of grabbing a bigger desk with onboard EQ etc? I'd find that quite limiting.

I liked the idea of a GSR24 with motorised faders via firewire and the valve channel but it's just too much money to justify.

I'll end up with either a ZEDR16 or Mackie 1640i. They'll obviously not sound quite as nice as an SSL, but I think the extra features make up for that. For me anyway.


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 12:43:

I probably will keep on using cubase for EQ and FX
I'm trying to get full analogue but multichannel eq's are expensive

So first step will be:
Source > Alphalink > desk for mixdown

Stage 2
Source > desk direct outs > Alphalink > desk alt ins for mixdown

The 2nd setup allows me to mix either DAWless or via daw back into mixer
Dawless is the ultimate goal, but i would need at least 6 stereopairs of EQ to setup on inserts. Maybe some dbx shit, dunno yet


Posted by cryophonik on Mar-16-2013 16:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
Not my pic, but my X-panda is on it's way to join my x-desk
Also chasing a Lexicon MX400XL to patch on send 1&2



Oh, you dirty little slut!


Posted by tehlord on Mar-16-2013 16:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
I probably will keep on using cubase for EQ and FX
I'm trying to get full analogue but multichannel eq's are expensive

So first step will be:
Source > Alphalink > desk for mixdown

Stage 2
Source > desk direct outs > Alphalink > desk alt ins for mixdown

The 2nd setup allows me to mix either DAWless or via daw back into mixer
Dawless is the ultimate goal, but i would need at least 6 stereopairs of EQ to setup on inserts. Maybe some dbx shit, dunno yet


Yeah but I reckon it'd be cheaper to buy a decent analogue desk with EQ per channel already on it than multiple outboard.

Just check this out, reading the specs.


Then tell me you don't want it

http://www.allen-heath.com/uk/produ...ProductId=GSR24


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 17:23:

Remember I had the ORAM Trident? Sounded very different from the SSL, A&H is Mackie + intergrated controller territory. I.e. No balanced inserts for starters
The superanaloque path of the SSL is unrivaled same as their Maxtrix and bigger units
That's 20k�+ if you want that equiped as rich as the A&H but SSL quality


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 17:33:

Since I don't have matrix or x-rack money, i'll settle with esquisite gain staging and summing, using the Daw as backend for automation and EQ / FX

I've also looked at 4x GoldenAge EQ73 (NEVE CLONE)
http://www.recording-microphones.co.uk/GA%20EQ73.shtml
but i'll think for now settle with analogue front end, digital backend and all sequencing done via Genome and Cirklon, both clocked via the Innerclock SyncGen II Pro


Posted by tehlord on Mar-16-2013 18:46:

You know Golden Age do a decent Neve style pre-amp and also a compressor now as well?

I bet you could get a really nice used SSL or Neve desk for about �20k you know.......


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 19:54:

yeah, but then the maintenance, I like virgin gear and either hug it, or flog it.


Posted by tehlord on Mar-16-2013 20:43:

I think you just like the chase


Posted by Raphie on Mar-16-2013 21:53:

No, there is definately a strategy behind it


Posted by tehlord on Mar-16-2013 22:09:

Me too. My strategy is want more stuff, buy more stuff.

I think it's working too.


Posted by DJ RANN on Mar-16-2013 22:48:

One thing I don't get about your setup Raphie, is why you're trying to use analogue desks especially when automation is thrown in to the mix.

You'd be better off going digital control surfaces like Euphonix MC range and then patching to/from (say via MADI) to pristine converters and outboard. At the moment you're doing at least two full passes of Digital to analogue conversion, so any perceived benefit is going to be negated.


Posted by jayxthekoolest on Mar-16-2013 22:58:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
One thing I don't get about your setup Raphie, is why you're trying to use analogue desks especially when automation is thrown in to the mix.

You'd be better off going digital control surfaces like Euphonix MC range and then patching to/from (say via MADI) to pristine converters and outboard. At the moment you're doing at least two full passes of Digital to analogue conversion, so any perceived benefit is going to be negated.


I think he's using it to give the individual elements color/analog warmth and to route them to effects? I don't think he's doing any automation. I could be wrong though.


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.