TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- A cd Release prerecording*updated*
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by DjJade on Oct-09-2002 05:48:

damn what kind of server are you on dude? im getting a 1.1mb/s transfer rate wow...nice mixing, i like the fading that you do with the tracks... veru subtle at times.... like the music too, i have alot of those songs


Posted by alphazipbo on Nov-01-2002 08:01:

Mixing - 8 I'm just not a fan of over loaded bass hits
energy - 4 I felt that you need some extra umph in your mix it felt like it needed to be sped up a bit.
track selection 9 - very good tracklisting
overall 7 - I felt that the energy lacked and the sigum track just felt weird at that spot

Good job =)


Posted by _Nut_ on Nov-03-2002 00:20:

quote:
Originally posted by migitymike
when i say release..maybe press 200..try to sell some to make back the money that im loosing by printing them..but its already figured a loss



I pray that you have recieved the correct reprint rights and go the ok from every single label to release and sell this CD on your own. A friend/DJ of mine thought he would do that, released a CD here and was making a good amount of money until Kontor found out about it.

Get this after court this is where he stands.

Fine: $200,000.00 (copyright infringement)
Jail: 2-10 years (Parole hearings start Feb 03)

Yes the bastard is awaiting a parol hearing in a few months.....

Your mixing is mint. Just be careful if you are tryin to make money off of this. tiesto couldnt use all of the tracks for ISOS 3 because the labels said no....


Posted by Dj Flesch on Nov-03-2002 02:21:

Here are my thoughts on how you can make this mix better (this is the mix that you have posted as new):

First, cut some of the dead space in the begining of the mix.

Transition 1: The volume was slightly higher on track 2. The tracks were beat and phrase matched and in the same key. Overall, very nice transition.

Track 2: Very well executed wah, flange and panning effects--if that was you and not in the original track

Transition 2: Track 2 almost ends completely before you start making your transition! I think that you kill a bit of energy by making the transition on the very edges of the tracks and not a bit further in. The beat and phrase matching was excellent, again, and the tracks are in the same key. Overall, good technical ability, but too drawn out for me.

Track 3: A nice track, but it has too many no bassline, slow periods, followed by pretty decent energy periods. The dichotomy is a little weird for me. Nice wah effect again.

Transition 3: The volume of the bass on track 4 is a bit much and overpowers the transition. You may want to lower the volume on the bass eq a little bit until after the transition is over. Again, the tracks are beat and phrase matched and in the same key.

Track 4: I also know this track as Apollo 440 - Charle's Angels. Though the version that I'm familiar with has a few lyrics in it.

Transition 4: Beat matching was oh so slightly off during the latter part of the transition, but the tracks were phrase matched and in the same key. Good eq effect right after the transition.

Track 5: Beatmatching was a little off, which you fixed by killing the bass on the outgoing track. Nice wah effect right after the transition.

Transition 5: Beatmatching was slightly off and the bassline kicks in pretty hard compared to the volume of the outgoing track. Since I've mixed this track (second sun) many-a-times, I can tell due to the siren sound. It is very important to listen to the highs when mixing this track because the bass drops off during the key transition time. The tracks were phrase matched and in the same key, though.

Track 6: The quickness of your flanging effects adds to the energy, and I really like how you increase the intensity of the effect! Do you have a Pioneer DJM-600? *grin* I also noticed an increase in BPM since the begining of your set.

Transition 6: The volumes were slightly noticable, but only very slightly. This transition was very good. Beat and phrase matched, in the same key etc. The "dead space" was very minimal.

Track 7: I actually had one of my tracks mislabeled as dreamland, and you helped me correct it (the right one was NU-NRG - Universe).

Transition 7: The volume of track 7 is a bit loud compared to the rest of the tracks. The beat matching could be slightly better--I've heard you do better, though it was good overall. Phrase matched and in the same key etc.

Track 8: Your wah effect was well timed, but out of place, IMO. I think that wahs go best right before a big break, and you just kind of threw it in the middle of a long stretch.

Transition 8: Beatmatching was slightly off, though it was mostly corrected--probably because the transition was short. The tracks were phrase matched and in the same key. This was a good transition as far as timing. The transition wasn't drawn out overly long like most of your others.

Track 9: This is a decent track. There are a couple of long low energy periods, which may not be good for a live set, but is fine for a cd set.

Transition 9: Excellent transition. Beat and phrase matched, in the same key. This transition was a pro transition. The tracks switched without loosing energy and without a noticable volume change. This is by far your best transition! Well done! You moved the volume bars fast on this one didn't you?

Track 10: Nothing to really say about this track. Fits well into your set.

Transition 10: The volume increase was very noticable on your incoming track. This was a nice long transition though kudos for having it so well beat matched! Phrase matched and in the same key as always. One thing that was very good about this transition was that even when the bass beat stopped for a beat or two during the cue track, you had already eliminated the bass beat from the last track so that you didn't get a weak bass beat for one or two beats. Hmm, okay I was fooled because I've been drinking All of that first part was part of track 10. I didn't delete it because it offers a valuble piece of advice. I noticed a slight decrease of volume on your incoming track though. Overall, a great transition, much like your last one. Short, sweet and to the point!

Track 11: I think that ending with track 10 is nonsense. Track 11 adds a lot to your set! It brings up the energy of your set quite a bit during the begining of the track and then lets you down very smoothly the way only great ending tracks can do!


Overall, it was a very nice set. Not noticable technical flaws (by an untrained ear anyway and the tracks were all good. My general comments steer toward making your transitions a bit tighter--like your last two transitions. Those were increadible (very much like an Armin Van Buren set I just heard. You picked good begining and ending tracks and did very well in between.

On another note, I spent about an hour and a half analizing your mix. I would very much appreciate if you would do the same with your own mix and learn from my comments!


Posted by JohnSmith on Nov-03-2002 21:14:

wow.. now that's a critique.


Posted by 531.am on Dec-17-2002 01:32:

god damn


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.