TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Do you know what bugs me?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]


Posted by DaveSZ on Mar-24-2003 04:32:

quote:
Originally posted by melech_mike
Are you kidding me???

CBC is so utterly bias against Israel.
I don�t understand how an "intellectual" person such as yourself cant even point this out!


I suppose if one of your passions is zionism, then you might take that kind of paranoid point of view...

Most people can tell the diff between fighting terror, and practicing it yourself...


Posted by melech_mike on Mar-24-2003 04:39:

quote:
Originally posted by DaveSaenz
I suppose if one of your passions is zionism, then you might take that kind of paranoid point of view...

Most people can tell the diff between fighting terror, and practicing it yourself...


What?
Just because i'm a Zionist, doesn't fog up my knowledge of what bias means!

I can spot bias, whether it's in favour of Israel or the Arabs.

the part about terrorism... i dont think i'm fully comprehending what you are trying to say. whats it have to do with the discussion at hand?


Posted by LiquidX on Mar-24-2003 04:41:

What bugs me is how Military errors have killed more of their own then what enemies have killed..


Posted by quddha on Mar-24-2003 05:39:

quote:
Originally posted by melech_mike
This is why the US government allowed over 600 journalists from all parts of the world to join the coalition forces driving into Iraq.

They didn't want the world having that kind of food, for thought!


However, journalists aren't allowed into iraq anymore except for the "embedded" journalists following the armies, and these journalists had to sign to some sort of censorship agreement.


Posted by melech_mike on Mar-24-2003 05:43:

quote:
Originally posted by quddha
However, journalists aren't allowed into iraq anymore except for the "embedded" journalists following the armies, and these journalists had to sign to some sort of censorship agreement.


Yes of course, but in regards to the US planting WMD, no journalist would keep that information censored!!!

Any journalist would pounce at the chance to bust the US for doing such a thing. It would be the scandal of the century!


Posted by robstar on Mar-24-2003 12:43:

quote:
Originally posted by LiquidX
What bugs me is how Military errors have killed more of their own then what enemies have killed..


I see your point but as funny as it might sound, it's better then them beeing killed by enemyfire.
As I said, it's sounds funny but I think u know what I mean.
Its indeed sad but these things happen and there's not much we can do about it. :/


Posted by robstar on Mar-24-2003 12:47:

quote:
Originally posted by melech_mike
Yes of course, but in regards to the US planting WMD, no journalist would keep that information censored!!!

Any journalist would pounce at the chance to bust the US for doing such a thing. It would be the scandal of the century!


Agree!
And I don't really belive that the Us would plant WMDs, don't think they need too as I'm convinced that there are some sort of WMDs in Iraq.
I'm sure that Saddam hasn't flushed down the "leftovers" into the toilet so to speak.


Posted by JudgeJulez on Mar-24-2003 16:24:

quote:
Originally posted by melech_mike
Substantiation of this find would demolish the arguments of the anti-war front led by France, Russia and Germany.

Watch how this plays out!


I don't think the discovery of ONE factory would "demolish" the arguments of the anti-war front. But like you said, who knows how this will all play out. Assuming this is indeed a big find, and more were to be discovered, I still don't think it does and will justify a mass unilateral invasion involving some 250k troops that blatantly disregards the UN and world public opinion and causes mass destruction of property and life. Pre-emptive attacks leading to war are just not justifiable.


Posted by mr. poopyhead on Mar-24-2003 18:07:

i doubt the UN inspectors who scoured the country for MONTHS could possibly miss a "huge" chemical weapons plant... if they missed a small stockpile of weapons, that's believeable... but to say they missed an entire factory??? doubt it..

either way, the american's will definitely plant evidence in iraq.... i'm not saying iraq is completely clean, but their stores will be greatly exaggerated by planted evidence.... there's no way bush is going on tv one day and saying, "whoops, i guess there were no weapons of mass destruction after all... my apoliogies to saddam and the rest of the world for all th trouble i've caused...." not bloody likely...


Posted by occrider on Mar-25-2003 01:38:

quote:
Originally posted by JudgeJulez
I don't think the discovery of ONE factory would "demolish" the arguments of the anti-war front. But like you said, who knows how this will all play out. Assuming this is indeed a big find, and more were to be discovered, I still don't think it does and will justify a mass unilateral invasion involving some 250k troops that blatantly disregards the UN and world public opinion and causes mass destruction of property and life. Pre-emptive attacks leading to war are just not justifiable.


But it does sort of implicate the UN as an ineffective institution.


Posted by JudgeJulez on Mar-25-2003 01:53:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
But it does sort of implicate the UN as an ineffective institution.


blah


Posted by victor on Mar-25-2003 03:53:

quote:
Originally posted by melech_mike
Yes of course, but in regards to the US planting WMD, no journalist would keep that information censored!!!

Any journalist would pounce at the chance to bust the US for doing such a thing. It would be the scandal of the century!


provided he was allowed to witness it in the first place... lol

this is a very lame argument... i know... i stand corrected anyways... i just popped the original question out just for kicks...


Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.