TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Polls - Everything Else...
-- Pro War or Anti War???
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Anti-War, but im not gonna bother trying to change anyones opinions.
Years of pro-american propaganda in the media, school etc .cannot be overcome by a 2 paragraph rant from me.
Anyone who is willing to open their mind and find out the truth would have done so by now.
What i will say is that people who say that it is wrong for me to make anti-war statements just becuase they know someone in the army are being silly.
I don't support the killing of innocent Iraqi civilians but Saddam needs to be removed in order to free the Iraqi people
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Incantation_UK I don't support the killing of innocent Iraqi civilians but Saddam needs to be removed in order to free the Iraqi people |
yeah im not for it but im not against it!!! they both are murderers bush and sadaam that is!!! lets kill em both :P 
Very Pro.
why can't we all just get along. hopefully they take care of business this time not like last time they where in Iraq.
late
dreamer
ANti-war
Anti-war....totally agsint the loss of innocent life. 
But I support our troops 100%
Pro War
Anti
I am an American living in Canada and with most all of the races of people I have met in Canada I seem to notice a common thing, they all don't even realize that freedom comes with a price.
Alot of people bash the U.S. because they know they kick ass.
Pro the War: Freedom, Democracy and civilized way of living
Against the War: support chemical warefare, genocide, support and praise the most saddistic, appaling and evil soul to date.
Come on people;
" Santa Clause ain't coming to town next year, who do you want climing down your chiminy, me or saddam???
Who pays the cost for our "way of life"?
anti-war! 
i dont understand the assumption that war and removal of saddam hussein is going to guarantee peace and stability in Iraq - its alot easier said than done for fucks sake!!
im divided on the issue - in some ways you might consider this the right war for the wrong reasons (if there is such a thing as a "right war"). But on the other hand DECLARING war is a huge act to undertake and to do something like that on a hunch... well...
There is no doubt that Saddam is a burdon to his people, but its not valid to declare war just on the basis of removing his oppressive regime - what about zimbabwe and mugabe, what about the chinese occupation of tibet??
who knows what the long term destabilising effects of this are gonna be - i sure dont and the US govt sure doesnt. All things weighed up i dont support the war
| quote: |
| Originally posted by melech_mike An i dont like the way France Germany and Russia are taking the situation to purely satisfy their individual interests!! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DaveSaenz U need a "neutral" option |
But Saddam Hussein MUST go, and if it takes war for that to happen then so be it. So actually that makes me kinda pro-war....oh dear, I'm confused.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MaRt I don't like arguments. Therefore I consider myself neutral But Saddam Hussein MUST go, and if it takes war for that to happen then so be it. So actually that makes me kinda pro-war....oh dear, I'm confused. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PaRaNoIk0 anti, but not on an extreme position. the situation would have to be stopped at a point, but I don't like the way USA are taking the situation to satisfy their interests. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Maaz You can't be neutral if you think that a war is needed if it overthrows the Iraqi government. Neutral would be someone who doesn't care at all (i.e. no opinions about Saddam, Bush or the war itself). |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DaveSaenz France and Russia had financial interests tied into Saddam's regime, so they were looking out for their own interests as well. |
come on usa, gun down some more families!
you should have put a don't care choice. not that i don't care, but i think war is not the answer to the problem at hand. unfortunately i think bush has poorly defined the problem.
Srry i gotta say im pro-war this time.
still debating
| quote: |
| Originally posted by butterfly you should have put a don't care choice. not that i don't care, but i think war is not the answer to the problem at hand. |
I'm all for pacifism... though i guess it won't count for much against those who would start a war. Though personally i think supporting the killing of anyone is wrong... perhaps maybe in self defense. But that would mean that starting a war is wrong cos that's aggression but passive defense is ok. I don't think the end justifies the means - killing to stop killing just doesn't make sense. Hmm, maybe i'm just another confused soul but i'm definitely anti-war.
Also another point - to sit on the fence is just to go with the status quo ie leave it up to others to make the decision for u. But then u've got to take the responsibility for that inaction too :-)
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.