TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Keyed tunes for Harmonic mixers
Pages (41): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »


Posted by BshidoHEAT on Sep-17-2005 04:14:

Thanks that makes sense


Posted by spdandpwr on Sep-17-2005 20:54:

Harmonic Mixing

A song will be harmonically compatible if it is in:
the same key (tonic)
a relative major/minor key
a subdominant key (perfect 4th)
a dominant key (perfect 5th)
For example, a song in Cm is compatible other songs in Cm, its relative major D#/Eb, its subdominant Fm and its dominant Gm. Subdominant and dominant keys are easy to find because they are the 4th and 5th scale notes from the tonic note. Relative majors are 3 half-steps above the tonic note of the minor key (in this case, C to D#/Eb). Conversely, relative minors are 3 half-steps below the major's tonic note.

A system of key codes was developed by Camelot Sound which makes this easier to remember. It assigns a code to each major and minor key based on the circle of fifths. From the chart below, you will see Cm is 5A. When working with key codes, compatible keys will always be +/- 1 number, or with the same number and a different letter. For example, 5A is compatible with 4A/6A and 5B, which corresponds to Fm/Gm and D#/Eb.





When matching songs harmonically, you must be aware that changing the speed of a song also changes its key, unless a key or pitch lock feature is used. To be exact, a 5.94631% shift in speed will shift the key by a half-step. So if you're mixing a song in Cm at +6%, it's going to be in C#m/Ebm. Similarly, a change in RPM on your turntable from 33 to 45 will shift the key up 5 half-steps, from Cm to Fm.


Taken from mixshare.com on september 17th


Posted by rafale on Sep-19-2005 19:17:

dat pretty much sums up the very foundations of this thread.

for the sake of people with deteriorating eyesight, i think that every once in a while a summary has to be made of the 40+ pages of this thread. sometimes i'm trying to look for something i know i've seen somewhere but i just can't remember what page it is on.

btw, is harmonics.defined.org still operational? i tried submitting stuff 2 weeks back but i got a 404.


cheerS..


Posted by Abhay on Oct-09-2005 12:28:

Heh,


i didn't even know about this concept....

I just go by the "feel" of the track, and then if i want to change the "feel" of the set, i start to put in tracks that drift away from that particular "feeling", and keep going like this from track-to-track, until i hit the "feeling" that i want, and keep playing tracks that give that "feeling" until i want to change....

For me, there was 4 types of feelings from tracks: Deep, Bright, Emotional, Upbeat... A track would be a combination of 2 of these. But not conflicting (eg. not deep and bright). so: Deep/upbeat, Bright/emotional, bright/upbeat, Deep/emotional


ppl have always said that my track selection is awesome, but now I think it was all a total fluke.

wow.. i have no musical ability, so i'll have a lot to learn about this topic.


Posted by Nemesis44 on Oct-09-2005 14:15:

Don't sweat it too much though, it isn't as difficult as it may sound to start with.
You may well find that once you start doing this you may well have been doing naturally before... on the other hand, once you look back at your old sets you may want to puke he he.

It will make your transitions a lot easier too.

Cheers
Nem


Posted by Krowster on Oct-09-2005 16:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Nemesis44
Don't sweat it too much though, it isn't as difficult as it may sound to start with.
You may well find that once you start doing this you may well have been doing naturally before... on the other hand, once you look back at your old sets you may want to puke he he.

It will make your transitions a lot easier too.

Cheers
Nem


Take Nem's word for it He knows EXACTLY what he's saying.

Cheers Nem


Posted by F�anor on Oct-20-2005 22:15:

I wish someone could make a single post and edit it, or at least, give link to a external db on the first page since there's no way everyones going to read the whole thread.

What about a Wikikey? (wiki dedicated to harmonic mixing)


Posted by spdandpwr on Oct-21-2005 01:05:

mixshare.com


Posted by F�anor on Oct-21-2005 06:46:

Yeah, but we don't know their program's acuracy.


Posted by Nemesis44 on Oct-22-2005 10:46:

As always though, human ear is better. Just learn a few chords on a key board. You don't even have to have a keyboard. Most sound cards have a function where you can find keys and press them on you computer keyboard. Just find the basic key that the song goes in. With trance that's usually enough as most of it's in minor keys.

You can usually tell what sounds right. The key is the one note that works with every part of the song.

Cheers
Nem


Posted by F�anor on Oct-22-2005 15:30:

I know. The point is that for a same track, someone else did it and we shouldn't have to do it again.

anyway...


Posted by dj jasonF on Oct-23-2005 20:04:

you can post samples in the mixshare forums and qualia will key them for you. and the program is preety acurate. key them with the prog and if you then work it with your ears. if you re still not sure... post a sample in mixshare.


Posted by F�anor on Oct-23-2005 22:27:

I guess you are right. I don't like the idea that a program can actually do that accurately. But well, I sure have to take some time getting my ears experienced!

Thanks!


Posted by dj jasonF on Oct-23-2005 23:28:

quote:
Originally posted by F�anor
But well, I sure have to take some time getting my ears experienced!

Thanks!


ive been telling this to my self since forever... still i cant key a song with a gun in my face.


Posted by davemolina on Oct-26-2005 16:16:

I know what you mean...

I can find the key, but determining major and minor is a bit tough. I'm using the mixshare program to point me in the right direction and just play with the piano till it sounds right.

I still get somewhat sour mixes every now and again, so I definitely need to improve.


Posted by dj jasonF on Oct-27-2005 08:26:

yea. i key stuff and then send samples to a friend to verify. but i only find 30% and its usualy the first one i try to key thats right.. weird.


Posted by skoom on Oct-30-2005 05:50:

iv read this whole thread and it is so imformative and helpfull
after just reading the thread you can tell what sets the top world dj's apart from the locals you see and think 'they can mix just as good' .. theres alot more to it and this thread covers so much


Posted by mikefasssy on Nov-05-2005 22:56:

what someone should do is email the people at disogs and see about adding this as an optional feature to releases.

i tihnk that would be easier than creating an entirely different database.


Posted by skoom on Nov-06-2005 16:56:

i have a theory.. sort of.. its pretty much just making whats known a little simpler for me..
the following is going by the musical scale of + and - semi-tones? (not sure)

with camelot system +1 gives positive energy and -1 give negative energy
on the musical scale, this is +7 semi-tones and +5 semi-toned
i think they selected this because minor and major chrods all use the 7th note from the tonic note.

according to nem a jump of +3 semi tones works well (because the 3rd note from tonic is part of a minor chord)
aswell +4 semitone jump also works because it is part of a major chord

so according to this +3, +4, +7 all have positive energy.
+5 has negative energy.

also going up one semitone creates positive enegry but must be done quickly because it may clash, also taking one semitone away decreases energy.
+1 = positive energy
-1 = negative energy
if you work with the C note, -1 is B, this is the same as +11
if you go from C to B in the same octave its +11. im going to work with +11 rather then -1 as negative energy

so far:
positive energy = +3, +4, +7, +1
negative energy - +5 +11

going back to how camelot works, +7 = positive +5 = negative..
this can be switched around if you think about it and work sort of like a clock,
-5 is the same as +7
+5 is the same as -7

we know that +7 adds energy, also +3 and +4 do too
+3 is the same as -9
+4 is the same as -8

+9 is the same as -3
+8 is the same as -4

if you work it out like how camelot does, this means with +3 and +4 adding energy, +9 and +8 (same as -3 and -4) would take away energy.

so we have:
positive: +3 +4 +7 +1
negative: +9 +8 +5 +11
this leaves +2, +6, +10
im assuming if you jump 2 semitones it also adds energy
so: +2 is jumping up two semitones, +10 is jumping down two semitones

positive: +3 +4 +7 +1 +2
negative: +9 +8 +5 +11 +10

now we are left with +6. we also have +12 if you want but that keeps the energy the same as its the same key.
so +6 is left all alone? im not sure what to work out of this, maybe it also keeps the energy the same but someone can work that out

now we have which keys mix well and which done (in general)

REMEMBER: iv been working in the musical scale (cromatic scale? im not sure what its called)

this is alot more confusing then the camelot system but it seems to work out in my head and im going to go by it..

im assuming i ordered the last part acording to the jump in energy?
+3 being relativly small and +2 being large
this would make the same for negative, +9 being small leap negative and +10 being large. (im not sure if that is correct someone help me out here)

ok.. well thats just my theory.. im not sure if it works well as im just picking up on harmonic mixing and dont yet know how to key tunes, aswell i cant really pick up a lift in energy too well, i can just tell what sounds good when mixing.


Posted by skoom on Nov-06-2005 17:18:

going by the above post i made im going to try set out rather then jump in energy, the sound of it, and how good it sounds..

positive: +3 +4 +7 +1 +2
negative: +9 +8 +5 +11 +10

+3 is the note used in minor
+9 is associated with +3 so lets keep them the same

+4 is the note used in major
+8 is associated with +4 so lets also keep these two the same

im assuming the +3, +9 would sound the best in minor chords
+4, +8 sounding best in major chords
(i mean, when mixing two tracks out of minor/major keys)

so +7 sounds the best because its used in both major and minor

+1 would sound bad if mixed (keep +11 with +1)
+2 would sound also bad, worse then +1 i assume (keep +10 with +2)

so, in order of best sounding (maybe?)
MINOR
positive: +7 +3 +4 +1 +2
negative: +5 +9 +8 +11 +10
MAJOR
positive: +7 +4 +3 +1 +2
negative: +5 +8 +9 +11 +10

since most tracks are in minor lets just use the minor one:
positive: +7 +3 +4 +1 +2
negative: +5 +9 +8 +11 +10

now the order with largest jump:
positive: +3 +4 +7 +1 +2
negative: +9 +8 +5 +11 +10

so, +7 would sound the best and do a average jump
+3 would do a small jump and sound quite good
+4 would do a bigger jump sound a little worse
+1 would do a large jump, sound quite bad (unless done right, switching fast)
+2 would do the biggest jump, but sound the worst
+12 sounds the best, keeps the same energy
+6 = duno yet.

for some reason i think im a little bit off? but im just putting ideas out someone correct me, thanx


Posted by skoom on Nov-06-2005 17:44:

ok, third post hehe
after working all that out, the energy jumps and best sounding mixes are basically the same for major and minor.. so working out the major and minor of tracks gives you the ability to work out if +3 or +4 sounds better? it also lets you mix to the relative minor/major.. so.. there isnt much use of major and minor is there? the camelot system adds +7 for minor AND major, they are the same except shifted over a little bit.. so for the best sounding mix, minor or major, you +7.. i spose since there are some majors out there working out the major helps if you dont like mixing a major to +7 minor? do they still sound the relativly good?
maybe thats why that big dj didnt write major/minor on his cd's (posted earlier in the tread).. because the jump in energy are pretty much the same and so is the quality of the mix..
so, does working out major and minor really matter? i mean it does if you want the best sounding mixes but they dont really sound that bad mixing from a major to +7 minor? im not sure as i said im still new but if the above theory works out then minor/major doesnt really matter as much in my head i dont think?

[EDIT]:
just want to add some more..
i think the jump in energy is more important to how the mix sounds (to the people you are playing to)..
how good the mix sounds only really effects DJ's and people that know how it sounds..
i read before people on xtc always want to have more energy given to them, so you would ALWAYS move up in energy..
would u move down in energy if you wanted to play a track that moves down? or would you take that track and put it back, and select another one that moves up in energy?
i think its subconsious (spelling) and even if your not on any drugs a lift in energy is good, weather it sounds bad or not
so you can have the best sounding mix, but sometimes go down in energy
or you could have a good sounding mix and go higher and higher..
or pick different tracks or select well and you get both, the best sounding set that always goes higher
i think this is what sets big dj's apart from the bedroom dj's that can mix well.. it can sound good, but if you go down in energy subconsiously people wont like it.. even if they do comment on how well you mixed.
anyway thats my 2c haha
also, all the above info is coming from someone who cant key tunes yet but has read this whole post and become very interested.. i used my common sence on most of it.. and boredom haha

anyway, im REALLY looking forward to what people have to say about what i think, as im not sure if im making any sence or being totaly wacko haha, but i think i make some sence..


Posted by Nemesis44 on Nov-06-2005 18:26:

quote:
according to nem a jump of +3 semi tones works well (because the 3rd note from tonic is part of a minor chord)


Actually the way I normally do it is -3 (e.g. 6a (gm) to 3a (a#m)) and +4 (The harmonic to the root).
This does vary at different parts in the chromatic scale though depending on octave and types of sound in a track so there is a certain amount of feeling the music involved.

As you correctly stated a jump of one on the chromatic scale or +7 in Camelots system would indeed produce a jump in energy but as you also correctly mentioned it would not be advisable to mix any musical elements of these tracks together as it would basiclally sound horrible. If you mix this in reverse you will get a drop in energy (Something I have heard a lot of hard house DJs do for some reason).

I find that moving up one or down on the Camelot scale can also produce a lift depending on octave.
Camelot's system basically works in the same way as playing a power chord on guitar. 9a to 10a contains the same root notes as an E5 chord. If you progress up in Camelot numbers you are effectively going from e.g. the root note (1st finger) of the chord to the higher note (2nd finger depending on your playing style) and visa versa if you are going down the scale.

I think you may have over analsised this some what though as it's quite simple in practice especially if you sort your records by key.

I mix the following ways...

-3
+4
+1
-1
+7

If you are playing a 12a and want to jump just pull out a 7a. That is a +7 (same as -5, but stopping thinking in that way because you will make it harder than it needs to be). If you are playing a 10a then jump +7 to 5a. Never go -7 as it will always drop in energy and feel.

Nearly all my tracks go in minor scales so I don't bother with Major stuff.

Some people get anal about what scale a track is in too but they you will just blow your mind and really limit your selection. Also if you are mixing at a point where that matters you are mixing parts with a lot of music in them and the chances of that sounding good are pretty slim.

Once you have your records keyed you will find that harmonic mixing is actually quite simple.
You will find that other things work sometimes too but stick with the above for now and build on that.

I hope I have helped a little.

Send me a PM if you still have more questions.

Cheers
Nem


Posted by skoom on Nov-06-2005 18:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Nemesis44
Actually the way I normally do it is -3 (e.g. 6a (gm) to 3a (a#m)) and +4 (The harmonic to the root).


-3 on the camelot scale is + 3 semitones in the chromatic scale..
6a (Gm) to 3a (A#m) is +3 semi tones

also, +4 on camelot scale is +4 semi tones on the chromatic scale

so the +3 and +4 i was talking about work out (i think?)

edit: just to make clear,

quote:
Originally posted by Nemesis44

I mix the following ways...

-3
+4
+1
-1
+7


thats going by camelot yeah?
so, if it was chromatic scale:
+3
+4
+7
+5
+1


Posted by Pinokio on Nov-13-2005 18:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Nemesis44
I mix the following ways...
-3
+4
+1
-1
+7


Is that in order of Jump in energy or the ones that sounds better.



quote:
Originally posted by Nemesis44
Some people get anal about what scale a track is in too but they you will just blow your mind and really limit your selection. Also if you are mixing at a point where that matters you are mixing parts with a lot of music in them and the chances of that sounding good are pretty slim.


This Got me confused
Let's Say I have a tune. and the Key is "E", now I don't know if it's sharp, minor , flat or major.

If I go to camelot Sound and let's say I want to mix a good sounding +3 tunes

I will see

12B (E Major) +3 = 3B (D-Flat Major)
5B (E-Flat Major) +3 = 8B (C-Major)
2A (E-Flat Minor) +3 = 5A (C-Minor)
9A (E minor) +3 = 12A (D-Flat Minor)


I noticed there are 2 Main Keys here (D) & (C).

No Let's Assume that the real Key of the tune is (E-Minor), All the results posted above will have a good sound?

I have four options here but If I choose 5A (C-Minor), that would actually be a +8, and I Haven't heard that +8 is a good sounding mix.

Can I mix from E-Minor into D-Flat Major, or into C-Major, or Viceversa from Major to minor? is this good or bad osunding, increasding or decreasing energy?


Thank You


Posted by Pinokio on Nov-13-2005 18:45:

ohh Another Question,
I know that the tunes change their key with the pitch change at about 3% I think, I'm not sure.

Let's assume I have a track at 135 BPM (A-Flat Minor)1A, and at 139 BPM it reaches +3%, that would make the tune be (E-Flat Minor) 2A?,

and at 131 BPM it reaches -3%, That would make the tune be (D-Flat Minor) 12A?


Also is the pitch % always the same or it chnages, let's say for example in some tunes when you add 3 BPM it will change pitch 3%, and in other tunes when you add 8 BPM it will change 3% pitch.

What's the Percent of the Pitch reffering to?

Also I noticed every change in pitch will modify the key of the track so IF I have a tune (A-Flat Minor) 1A at 2.50 %, it would be better to assume that tune is mor enear to be a 2A rather than a 1A?


Thanks Again.


Pages (41): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.