TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- CD-DJ's Look This Way!!!
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Oh wow. What can I say. Those are more beautiful than Jose Amnesia - The Eternal. Wow. I hope I'll own a pair of those on display inside a glass case in my room in a couple years (in increments of five years).

quote:

Originally posted by pfunk Keep it Vinyl

keep it cdj's, keep it vinyl. its the same thing, just chose wutever u like, simple!!.

p.s. dont tell others wat to do.

should i forget about the denon s3000's now? i think i should, those techics are just AMAZING..........

fuck the cddj i want the mixer

quote:

Originally posted by Nell its almost guaranteed theyll be out in 2004.

Can you be a little more specific on that please? cuz i was gonna get the denons but when i saw these i changed my mind...... but if im gonna have to wait a year for these ill just go back to the denons....

whoever said cds cant have as good sound quality as vinyl is worng. yes the typical shop bought cd is not recoreded particularly high, but they can exceed vinyl by far, ask any audio enthusiast or technician.

anyway, i bet you a million quid you cant tell the difference if i blindfolded you and played hte same track on the same system from a regular cd (on the lower standard frequencies) and a vinyl. the only way you could tell the difference is from all the hissing crap and skipping of the vinyl (which aint sommat to be proud of)

quote:

Originally posted by A_M_8 Can you be a little more specific on that please? cuz i was gonna get the denons but when i saw these i changed my mind...... but if im gonna have to wait a year for these ill just go back to the denons....

well hopefulyl we will know tommorow when its unveiled!

Any recent news after the 7th, Nell?

quote:

Originally posted by erdega I am still waiting for the dvd player, cds are simply not good enough as far as the sound performance but this is a good start.

i wanna mix tracks in 7.1 surround sound

WOW, i haven't seen anything as beautiful as these babies in a long time...

quote:

Originally posted by whitesmoke i wanna mix tracks in 7.1 surround sound

YES!

quote:

Originally posted by A_M_8 Any recent news after the 7th, Nell?

i dont know mate, all the reviews and stuff is in japanese (sp?) so im waiting for a translation!

hopefully thre will be a release date in there somewhere! ive got to get these!

i went to the dj shop yesterday afternoon and i asked them about the technics release date. they said about a month or 2.

Will be interesting to see if the Technics mixer can match it with A&H, CD player looks nice but until you actually use it how can any sort of judgement be made?

WTF!!

When I first just threw my eyes on the picture in the middle I thought it was a regular 1210, but slightly photoshoped..! this is awesome!!

quote:

Originally posted by Nell why? if you had 2 of these, and record your cds to the same frequency as vinyl (48,000), what advantage does vinyl have? answer: none! cd has too many to mention.

I think its time for a lesson in how digital media is composed. Firstly, cd's are digital media(duh), they take an analog waveform and sample it as to get as close to the true analog wave as possible. This is called sampling. the number of times you sample a given point of the waveform is called sampling rate. The information derived from that sample is then represented as 16 bits of digital information. In order to sample a given frequency accurately, you must sample it at least double the frequency of the highest note you want to hear. In our case human hearing can discern(supposedly) up to 22Khz or 22,000 cycles per second. So in effect a cd must double that frequency with a small amount of headroom 22Khz * 2= 44Khz + 4Khz(for better accuracy). No matter how many times you sample the waveform it is still represented by 16 bits of information. Newer technologies are looking at 22 or 24 bits, hence more information and a higher resolution.

Analog waveforms are continuous, digital waveforms are dis-continous so you must sample the waveform to get as much information as possible so then it can be reassembled with a digital audio converter(in every cd player and home computer)and played out of an analog device(speakers). So basically the comparison you are making is apples and oranges. Since cd's sample information you will always lose some information (just like in lossy compression). The question is can you hear the difference.




Mizzzunoooooo

quote:

Originally posted by mizzuno In order to sample a given frequency accurately, you must sample it at least double the frequency of the highest note you want to hear. In our case human hearing can discern(supposedly) up to 22Khz or 22,000 cycles per second. So in effect a cd must double that frequency with a small amount of headroom 22Khz * 2= 44Khz + 4Khz(for better accuracy).

Otherwise known as Nyquists theory of sampling!

quote:

Originally posted by erdega I am still waiting for the dvd player, cds are simply not good enough as far as the sound performance but this is a good start.

those are some what out, its called dvd audio

I recently read that CD audio publishers want to change over to either dvd-audio or SACD (Super Audio CD) formats b/c of the quantity and extreme quality of the sound from these media.

technics, pioneer, and denon will have to release new versions or new CDJ decks altogether to make up for these added formats.

I tend to believe in vinyl b/c it's a steady way for DJs to encourage a single medium standard... being vinyl. There's too many technological advancements that are not audible to the avergae home listenner, and all that extra quality is muffled or distorted away when played in clubs, so what the hell is the point??

also.. who would buy a 5.1 dvd-audio system for their living room to hear "mc-mario's hits 2005" in 5.1 sound at 128 bit and 500000000KHZ???? Hell if it were for Veracocha's Carte Blanche 2004, then I'd buy anything!!!

why can't you just use both?

both have hteir advantages and disadvantages.

get both and you can take advantage of all the advantages.

quote:

Originally posted by Acid Circus Will be interesting to see if the Technics mixer can match it with A&H, CD player looks nice but until you actually use it how can any sort of judgement be made?

technics, direct drive platter nuff said

quote:

Originally posted by montie why can't you just use both? both have hteir advantages and disadvantages. get both and you can take advantage of all the advantages.

i woudl do, but imo, these factors make a difference:

vinyl is larger and heavier (cds are small)
vinyl wears, cds dont (if you take care of them)
vinyl is more expensive..

i.e. to buy mike shiver - feelings from hooj.com you need to spend £8 to get both vinyls, where as you can spend £3.50 for the cdr, get an extra mix, and have the other cd advantages mentioned above.

thats the reason i do it. personalyl preference, i dont see any advantages of vinyl in the modern day as a format.

imo opinion the use of vinyl is in a lot of the cases sentimental. I treasure my vinyls and look after them and love collecting them. CD's to me are mass produced pieces of crap that I use for coasters.

quote:

Originally posted by Acid Circus Otherwise known as Nyquists theory of sampling!

cheers! I knew it had a name

Mizz1

Those are tight

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.