TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Is Trance Dead?
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »


Posted by Floorfiller on Sep-17-2003 01:21:

trance is DEAD!!!...you can stop reading these forums now...


Posted by mndeg on Sep-17-2003 02:35:

quote:
Originally posted by NYCTrancefan
Ah, the old question about trance, could have swore I heard this queston 10, 5, 2 years ago you get the point, people will keep asking and I will keep on partying. Partying till eternity that is. So that answers that question. There is a lot of cheese out there but true TAs know the good stuff from the bad stuff for the most part. Peace, Trance and Happiness.

are you black


Posted by mndeg on Sep-17-2003 02:36:

btw pvd looks like he could be in that movie with those living robots with the i see dead people kid


Posted by sandstorm03 on Sep-17-2003 03:04:


Posted by Floorfiller on Sep-17-2003 03:06:

quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
are you black



Posted by Rakoon on Sep-17-2003 03:13:

Yup for me its dying. I prefer house/breaks and hip hop now, but there still are a few (just a few) good trance tracks every now and then.


Posted by Allyn on Sep-17-2003 03:20:

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03




That was a wee bit disturbing.

btw, trance isn't dead, as said by many before me


Posted by DJDigDug on Sep-17-2003 05:53:

no


Posted by Buddhistics on Sep-17-2003 08:50:

Thumbs up

quote:
Originally posted by Shad0wmaster
trance is very much alive...maybe it's the intelligence of some of tranceaddict's members that's dead...



.....well said


Posted by Redd on Sep-17-2003 10:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Sinistar

but ill ask you assholes one thing: if it was so painfully ignorant a question, why not just let it drop from the board hmmm? why be a cocksucker? maybe you could explain why you just HAVE to run your mouths?



The bitterness.. Not that I participated in the flaming, but I think I can answer your question; If being a "cocksucker" prevents newbies etc. to constantly repeat questions instead of doing some thinking and research on their own, I think I like "cocksuckers". Your question could have been answered just by reading posts in this forum and checking out a couple of trance-sites. Instead you ask a question that has been asked and answered one million times before (overstatement to make a point). This is why people react and "HAVE to run their mouths".

Anyway, newbies are ment to be flamed. If you don't do your homework and try to use your brain, you should just get used to it


Posted by GT40 on Sep-17-2003 10:51:

I doubt any genre of music will die a scene just re invents itself.


Posted by slyfox 1 on Sep-17-2003 16:02:

TRANCE IS DEAD.


Posted by Rostros on Sep-17-2003 18:25:

quote:
Originally posted by slyfox 1
TRANCE IS DEAD.



lmao , stfu you salad dodger !


Posted by NYCTrancefan on Sep-17-2003 19:57:

quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
are you black


funny that you should ask that question, born and raised so looks that way to moi. Yes I am and the reason that you ask is. Are you white.


Posted by pyro264jb on Sep-17-2003 20:46:

quote:
Originally posted by slyfox 1
TRANCE IS DEAD.


Michelle we all know that your an in the closet OO fan


Posted by NuDarkBeat on Sep-18-2003 00:48:

Anyone who posts on this site and asks if trance is dead is an idiot...HELLO THE WHOLE ENTIRE FUCKING SITE IS DEVOTED TO TRANCE.
Do you see websites with forums devoted to swing music. I think not.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Sep-18-2003 19:47:

In the underground trance scene it is still alive and kicking but looking at the charts its getting worse, and especially albums. This year there was no proper Euphoria, and a lot of major albums slipped a lot. There's been this annoying tendancy to look back at classic trance rather than focusing on the new stuff.

1999 and 2000 were great years, full of experimentation and chart success. 2001 dimmed slightly, but the music was more modern. If you look at 2002 all the big hits were remakes. The charts always reward originality in trance, so when Scooter's hardcore/trance crossover burst onto the scene, the charts lapped it up even if we hated it.

Anyway trance has been fairly major since 1996, so its seven years old now. If you look at rave and hardcore's domination in the early 90s it only lasted six years so we're living on borrowed time really. Soon a new style of dance will emerge and be the rage for a while.


Posted by Joca on Sep-18-2003 19:53:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
If you look at 2002 all the big hits were remakes.



Can you list off some of these hits?


Posted by SebG on Sep-18-2003 21:28:

You should be shot.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Sep-18-2003 21:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Carona
Can you list off some of these hits?


Well there was Mauro Picotto with Pulsar 2002, Agnelli and Nelson with Everyday 2002, Traveller and In-Motion, the massive remix of Energy 52 by Marco V, then all the Ministry of Sound backed garbage like Flip and Fill which were all covers of early 90s happy hardcore tracks... A lot of others I can't quite bring to mind but I'd hear them, think finally an original release then find it was a re-release a month later.


Posted by RTP on Sep-18-2003 21:54:

quote:
Originally posted by dj-sean
Yes it's true, trance is dead.

True words.

But ... just to admit: REAL trance had died already years ago...


Posted by hooknife on Sep-19-2003 15:02:

quote:
Originally posted by RTP
True words.

But ... just to admit: REAL trance had died already years ago...


The word "trance" is so broad it just seems too hard to say it's dead. This subject sucks!


Posted by Swamper on Sep-19-2003 15:34:

The problem is when producers/DJs that have been around a long time hog the spotlight and get attention for lack-lustre productions just because of their past accomplishments...

We all know there are plenty of young talented producers/DJs out there that aren't getting the recognition they deserve just because many of the the old schoolers are hesistant to give them a chance.

Also - every generation is becoming more computer-literate than the one before it - lots of ppl are experimenting with making music just because they have the tools available to them at home. Just take a look in the Amateur section on this site and you'll see that.

Point being that once Trance reaches saturation in its current strong markets then it has to already be on a path of expansion elsewhere to keep things evolving. The internet and MP3 have done both of those for electronica - remove the latter and your exposure is limited to clubs/raves & albums, remove the former and you have no economically viable avenue to spread the sound globally to new regions - resulting in less demand to fly over DJs to spin and less familiarity with names that would result in album/vinyl sales.

I wrote about this stuff over a year ago.


Posted by mizzuno on Sep-19-2003 15:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Swamper


I wrote about this stuff over a year ago.


you truly are a seer


MIzzuno


Posted by mizzuno on Sep-19-2003 15:40:

this thread is so classic,i remember threads very similar to this in 2001 when progressive came around....i wish there was some originality here. Fact of the matter is trance is not dead there are many young artists up and coming, to be honest this is classic alarmist BS. Go look through the other dumb trance is dead threads from back in the day....2002 came along and poof trance is the shit again. You guys really need to open your horizons past 2 weeks...


MizzzUNO


Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.